drmatt wrote:
> Isn't room correction a glorified tone control anyway, albeit one where
> the controls are handed off to a microphone instead? For most people,
> buying a bigger amp is a glorified tone control, as it usually provides
> a bigger bass..
Not really there is usually a well designed
Bigger as in more powerful, I meant. Which usually means better power
supply overhead, which usually means bigger dynamics and slightly better
bass impact.
Usually. There are exceptions to every postulated rule.
drmatt's
drmatt wrote:
> Isn't room correction a glorified tone control anyway, albeit one where
> the controls are handed off to a microphone instead? For most people,
> buying a bigger amp is a glorified tone control, as it usually provides
> a bigger bass..
Wrong, given that we are talking about good,
Julf wrote:
> Indeed. My question was somewhat rhetorical.
Isn't room correction a glorified tone control anyway, albeit one where
the controls are handed off to a microphone instead? For most people,
buying a bigger amp is a glorified tone control, as it usually provides
a bigger bass..
---
You can go two ways here . With "home remaster" .
Just please yourself :)
Or another kind of accuracy what was the original intent ? Know vinyl
limitations they mastered around ? Some producer preasure to make it
loud etc ? But that reuires some insigth and extra information about the
recording
drmatt wrote:
> Imho it's not.
Indeed. My question was somewhat rhetorical.
> At least it's done fully digitally so is theoretically not degradatious
> (a new word, made by me. Like it?) compared to traditional analogue tone
> controls.
I guess "not degradatious" is the same as "transparent",
liffy99 wrote:
> Is it posible to rip DVD Audio discs ?
> What is the file format (when I explore a disk I caanot identify which
> are audio tracks - it may be the ones showing with a file type of AOB).
>
> If I can, will I be able to straem them via a Squeezebox that supports
> 24/96 data rates
