edwardthern wrote:
> Yes I know what the topic is about. But I am asking YOU why did you
> purchase gear that uses a transfer method that you don't believe in?
>
I see no evidence that Mnyb has said that he owns gear that uses a
transfer method that he doesn't believe in.
As I understnd his o
arnyk wrote:
> I see no evidence that Mnyb has said that he owns gear that uses a
> transfer method that he doesn't believe in.
>
> As I understnd his older posts, the Meridian gear he owns was made and
> sold long before MQA was put on the market - years if not decades.
>
>
>
>
> Totally a
pablolie wrote:
> All totally correct. We should all be aware there are far more critical
> applications out there, and bit loss would be unacceptable (which is why
> one also has correction and error detection codes thrown in). The stuff
> works, period. And there's absolutely no way the same id
philippe_44 wrote:
> As a (very) occasional reader (and even less commenter) of such threads,
> I'm afraid that it's hopeless to try to give the correct explanation.
> Most people do not understand the fundamental difference between
> analogue and digital. As said in another thread, you can chose
And even the analog part is relitively deterministic and one dimensional
compared to the mechanical converters in the audio system ?
Microphones and speakers and acoustics .( or pickups and turntables if
one wants another mechanical thing in the audio chain ).
With really skilled engineering you