drmatt wrote:
> Believe me, I've been an escalation point for an outsourced technical
> organisation...
Ouch! You have my sympathies. And point taken...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid
Julf wrote:
> I think it is a great idea, but I doubt it will help. The reason some of
> us old farts have been exposed to that same "innocent ignorance" for a
> very long time. If you try the soft approach for 10 years, and see it
> doesn't work, you realize that you will never change the mind
drmatt wrote:
> Make it part of the FAQ. A sticky thread at the top of the forum.
> Whatever.
I think it is a great idea, but I doubt it will help. The reason some of
us old farts have been exposed to that same "innocent ignorance" for a
very long time. If you try the soft approach for 10
I don't see any of that, I see ignorance (in the innocent, non
derogatory sense), followed by snidey in jokes and comments implying the
OP is thick, which causes automatic defensive mode, which causes the
perception that people don't want to listenand escalation to flame war.
If the first
drmatt wrote:
> So there you go, misunderstandings everywhere... ;)
>
> Calm down and educate instead of berating.
I really shouldn't come down here.
I always get wound up by at least one thread featuring either Arrogant
Stupidity or Stupid Arrogancy - one of the two.
End.
*Vortexbox LMS
So there you go, misunderstandings everywhere... ;)
Calm down and educate instead of berating.
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread:
drmatt wrote:
> The point that was missed here was simple: *why* were we talking about
> how an SBT performs with LMS stopped while it drains its buffer. That is
> nothing to do with ignorance, wilful or otherwise, that is
> straightforward misreading.
I didn't misread it.
You (collectively)
Julf wrote:
> What deeper meaning is there in misinformation based on ignorance?
The point that was missed here was simple: *why* were we talking about
how an SBT performs with LMS stopped while it drains its buffer. That is
nothing to do with ignorance, wilful or otherwise, that is
If you have above cable or similar you need to read this.
http://www.klinktbeter.be/index.php/specials/highend-switch
SB Touch to Yamaha A-S501, Boston Acoustics A26.
SB 3 to Audio Pro T3.
SB BOOM
SB Radio
ReadyNAS 202
iPeng
http://www.analogueseduction.net/ethernet-and-streaming-cables/aqvox-high-end-ethernet-10m-network-cable-cat-7.html
21645
+---+
|Filename: AQETHERNET.jpg |
|Download:
drmatt wrote:
> misunderstanding the deeper meaning that is not fully communicated on
> the page.
What deeper meaning is there in misinformation based on ignorance?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will
Mnyb wrote:
> Note that I sugested "pull the plug and listen to the player buffer" as
> a way to actually understand how little the server does vs SQ . Not as
> a serius sugestion .
I knew that, because I wasn't angry when I read your post.
But angry people don't read what was written, or at
drmatt wrote:
> So in other words you are venting your spleen. Good for you. Welcome to
> the playground.
:)
+1
Note that I sugested "pull the plug and listen to the player buffer" as
a way to actually understand how little the server does vs SQ . Not as
a serius sugestion .
( hint it sounds
My question is aimed at those down here in the cellar that have the
ability to interpret 1s and 0s differently to everyone else because they
can apparently hear what can't possibly be there better than the rest of
us.
I will accept that my DAC and everything after that in the chain can
influence
d6jg wrote:
> You are taking my question literally - and I thank you for the answer -
> but the question is not intended literally.
OK, you got me!
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
Apesbrain wrote:
> Not sure if I'm addressing your question but I've noticed when I
> attenuate the space between tracks on a digitized LP it sounds too
> "black". I usually just do a brief fade in the half-second before the
> next track.
You are taking my question literally - and I thank you
Not sure if I'm addressing your question but I've noticed when I
attenuate the space between tracks on a digitized LP it sounds too
"black". I usually just do a brief fade in the half-second before the
next track.
PS My mild form of tinnitus definitely sounds better in digital - at
least it does to my slightly tarnished yellow ochre ears!
*Vortexbox LMS 7.9 music on QNAP TS419p via NFS* iThingys/iPeng/Tablets
*Living Room* - SB3 -> Onkyo TS606 - > Celestion Ditton F20s - Zone 2 ->
Sony TA FE 320 ->
If I digitised - note that is a UK digitisation not the sort practiced
in the USA or other places where they only think they can speak or write
English - a vinyl record to FLAC do you think that if left unprocessed
by fancy dancy software would a period of silence "recorded" in this way
sound
19 matches
Mail list logo
