Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread Videodrome
I've had good results with DH Labs' 75 ohm cable (called D-75). You can order it many place pre-terminated, or in bulk from Parts Connexion and DIY. Be sure to order the corresponding 75 ohm connectors. It's a great cable for a great price and it's easy to terminate:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread adamslim
My general policy on cables is to come up with a really good reason why well terminated decent cables won't do the job. When I can't, I buy http://www.bluejeanscable.com/store/digital-audio/index.htm They are cheap and work. Spending loads and trying to listen for the difference will only make

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread 325xi
mvalera;223740 Wrote: Maybe I'm asking a dumb question... but how can you pick up radio frequeny - electromagnetic interference on an optical cable using light to transmit the data? I don't know - perhaps you just can't. :) But the original Q was about coax SPDIF, not Toslink. -- 325xi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread 325xi
Pat Farrell;223749 Wrote: ... But if the DAC is properly isolating the Digital from the Analog side, you should have a problem. The 172Kb/s on off stream doesn't modulate into anything audible by humans. Hmm... We're talking digital signal, right? Can EMI/RF smear the edges and thus

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread 325xi
adamslim;223890 Wrote: My general policy on cables is to come up with a really good reason why well terminated decent cables won't do the job. That's discussed to death in lamp cord threads - not all cables are manufactured to specification, and not all wire manufacturers offer consistent

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread Pat Farrell
325xi wrote: Pat Farrell;223749 Wrote: ... But if the DAC is properly isolating the Digital from the Analog side, you should have a problem. The 172Kb/s on off stream doesn't modulate into anything audible by humans. Hmm... We're talking digital signal, right? Can EMI/RF smear the edges

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread 325xi
Pat Farrell;223925 Wrote: If jitter is a problem with your target DAC. Pat Farrell;223925 Wrote: Because things like Benchmarks and Larvys are not going to notice, but they cost a grand. First, with Lavry people reported here that sound varies with different sources. We all also know

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread ErikM
True 75 ohm cable, with very high quality Mil Spec wire, sounds great. Why not try it and some others cables?? Best way to know what sounds the best is to listen. Although I realize that isn't always the prefered method around here. http://www.fatwyre.com 325xi;223726 Wrote: Why to pay $150?

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread 325xi
With all my due respect, this is a marketing BS. When I asked why I asked for technical reasons. As for listening to digital cables, it's like letting a blind man into a maze, and trying to make rational decisions based on his movements. -- 325xi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread adamslim
325xi;223922 Wrote: That's discussed to death in lamp cord threads - not all cables are manufactured to specification, and not all wire manufacturers offer consistent quality from batch to batch. I didn't suggest lamp cord - the Blue Jeans cables are good quality wire, the correct

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-30 Thread 325xi
adamslim;223992 Wrote: I didn't suggest lamp cord My apologies if I was unclear - I by no means called Blue Jeans a lamp cord. I'm not sure they are perfect for analog conections (it's just I'm not convinced that cable geometry doesn't matter at all, and what they offer is very straight

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread zanash
pfarrel is right an rca plug cannot be 75ohm its a design thing ...I don't know if the canare is close or notbut as said its to do with the diameter and size of the central conductor ..I can't see who they have managed it I've put up a simple diy recipe that will outperform all but the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread Deaf Cat
I've only tried, the three chord's, a Cardas and a VDH andoh can't remember the others, still I settled with the Chord digi Signature love it :D VDH did nothing for my kit or ears, Cardas was wonderfully warm, detailed and relaxing, Chord Sig bit more of a wake up call :) Try your favorite

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread 325xi
Some time ago I decided I won't pay premium price for cables anymore - unless I know it is technically justified, which didn't happen to me yet - so Au is out. Too bad I didn't try it before. :) Now, what about RF/EMI and shielding? All BS, or there's something in that? -- 325xi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread opaqueice
jhm731;223532 Wrote: Take a look at Audience's Conductor cables: http://www.audience-av.com/cables/c_description.php Thanks for the link. There's some entertaining reading there, particularly this: http://www.audience-av.com/powerchord/ To the OP, I would recommend bluejeans cables.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread eiret
Just for the couriosity. http://www.venhaus1.com/diycatfivecables.html -- eiret eiret's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11521 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread ErikM
Stereovox XV2, a true giant killer. http://www.signals-superfi.com/stereovox/index.html http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0706/stereovox_xv2.htm -- ErikM ErikM's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread 325xi
ErikM;223725 Wrote: Stereovox XV2, a true giant killer. http://www.signals-superfi.com/stereovox/index.html http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0706/stereovox_xv2.htm Why to pay $150? I don't mind if it makes sense, so... anything special about this cable? -- 325xi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread mvalera
Maybe I'm asking a dumb question... but how can you pick up radio frequeny - electromagnetic interference on an optical cable using light to transmit the data? -- mvalera Michael Valera Online Communities Manager Logitech Streaming Media Systems slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread mvalera
Oops sorry! You're referring to the coax version. I always forget that spdif is either optical or coax. :p Mike -- mvalera Michael Valera Online Communities Manager Logitech Streaming Media Systems slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-29 Thread Pat Farrell
mvalera wrote: mvalera wrote: Maybe I'm asking a dumb question... but how can you pick up radio frequency - electromagnetic interference on an optical cable using light to transmit the data? Oops sorry! You're referring to the coax version. I always forget that spdif is either optical or

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread 325xi
I'll need SPDIF cable soon, and I'm curious which one to pick. Although they are fairly simple devices with well defined specifications, I see two potential pitfalls in them. First, if the manufacturer targets mass market, to keep costs low he may allow way too high deviation from

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread Pat Farrell
325xi wrote: I'll need SPDIF cable soon, and I'm curious which one to pick. (Sony/Philips Digital InterFace) A serial interface for transferring digital audio from CD and DVD players to amplifiers and TVs. S/PDIF is typically used to transmit PCM and Dolby Digital 5.1, but is not tied to any

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread 325xi
Pat Farrell;223475 Wrote: 325xi wrote: I'll need SPDIF cable soon, and I'm curious which one to pick. (Sony/Philips Digital InterFace) A serial interface for transferring digital audio from CD and DVD players to amplifiers and TVs. S/PDIF is typically used to transmit PCM and Dolby

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread Pat Farrell
325xi wrote: I'm really wondering if you have read the rest of my post - or just the first line?.. Wondering? i doubt it. Yes, but with your attitude, I can stop, maybe even fire up the kill file. Spend what you want, its a low end consumer interface. Buy two different ones, spend $5 each

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread 325xi
Right, and ALL cables with labeled SPDIF are exactly 75 Ohm and ALL of them manufactured up to highest standards. Sure. You're good at killing threads. If you believe that all cables are the same indeed - why bother to answer? -- 325xi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread SuperQ
325xi;223467 Wrote: Second, RF/EMI shielding can vary between the brands, and there were some experiments where SPDIF cable picked lots of noise which caused DAC to get crazy, and some DIY shielding resolved it. So this is potential issue to look for. What do you guys think - how to know

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread Pat Farrell
325xi wrote: Right, and ALL cables with labeled SPDIF are exactly 75 Ohm and ALL of them manufactured up to highest standards. Sure. No cable with RCAs is close to 75 ohm. Can't be done. If you care about the impedance, you have to use BNC. I am not claiming that all cables are identical. Not

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread mftech
Pat Farrell;223490 Wrote: 325xi wrote: Right, and ALL cables with labeled SPDIF are exactly 75 Ohm and ALL of them manufactured up to highest standards. Sure. No cable with RCAs is close to 75 ohm. Can't be done. If you care about the impedance, you have to use BNC. [/url] Hi Pat,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread Pat Farrell
mftech wrote: Hi Pat, I'm not sure about your affirmation about connector impedance but Canare manufacture an excellent RCA connector for video and digital audio purpose. Yes, Canare makes good stuff. As does another professional vendor: Mogami http://www.mogamicable.com/ This RCA connector

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread mftech
I mean adequate for video and digital application, I used both the RCA Canara and the Belden 1694A in a profession setup to interface a DVD Spdif Output to a 32 X 32 AES Routing switcher. I totally agree with you Pat, RCA connector are not the best for inter connecting video and audio

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread jhm731
Take a look at Audience's Conductor cables: http://www.audience-av.com/cables/c_description.php 325xi;223467 Wrote: I'll need SPDIF cable soon, and I'm curious which one to pick. Although they are fairly simple devices with well defined specifications, I see two potential pitfalls in

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beating a dead horse: choosing SPDIF cables

2007-08-28 Thread Pat Farrell
mftech wrote: I mean adequate for video and digital application, Oh no, not adequate, this the audiophile forum, it has to be extra special. Of course, S/PDIF is for signaling two channel audio, which needs to move a bit more than 172 Kbytes/second, and video signals for plain old TV need