Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-03 Thread Skunk
regalma1;184943 Wrote: Why not make a connection to your receiver from your USB port. You can either buy an external DAC or you could get a USB to SPDIF convertor (coax or Toslink, either is dirt cheap compared to a good DAC). It can't be that simple. Don't you have to install special

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread spooley
Thanks for the info. I am going to go for the SB3. -- spooley spooley's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10468 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33197

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread regalma1
You wrote that you had an RCA connection between your computer and your receiver. I am assuming that this is an analog connection, not SPDIF. Most computer sound cards are pretty poor quality. Why not make a connection to your receiver from your USB port. You can either buy an external DAC or you

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread P Floding
regalma1;184943 Wrote: You wrote that you had an RCA connection between your computer and your receiver. I am assuming that this is an analog connection, not SPDIF. Most computer sound cards are pretty poor quality. Why not make a connection to your receiver from your USB port. You can

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread Phil Leigh
P Floding;185015 Wrote: I haven't heard many say that TOSLINK is horrible. It is however, very, very irritating that a supposedly digital interconnection method gives results that vary depending on cabling, etc, etc. And since this is the audiophile section, after all, I'd question the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread P Floding
Phil Leigh;185023 Wrote: I'm afraid that the fact you find SB not robust is entirely down to you tinkering with your computer. Speaking personally I find that USB DAC's suck from a sound quality perspective... that may be down to the implementations rather than anything inherent in the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread Phil Leigh
P Floding;185025 Wrote: Huh? I find the SB roboust. When did I say anything else? And when did I ever mention tinkering with my computer? I barely touch it.. I wasn't replying to YOU PF! I was replying to regalma! -- Phil Leigh

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread jeffmeh
I believe Phil Leigh meant to quote regelma 1 -- jeffmeh jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33197

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread Phil Leigh
P Floding;185033 Wrote: Oh.. You quoted me.. Sorry - my mistake - apologies! -- Phil Leigh Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread P Floding
Phil Leigh;185029 Wrote: I wasn't replying to YOU PF! I was replying to regalma! Oh.. You quoted me.. -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) P Floding's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread jeffmeh
regalma1;184943 Wrote: You wrote that you had an RCA connection between your computer and your receiver. I am assuming that this is an analog connection, not SPDIF. Most computer sound cards are pretty poor quality. Why not make a connection to your receiver from your USB port. You can

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread Phil Leigh
jeffmeh;185037 Wrote: I recognize the inherent issues with Toslink, but I agree that these certainly can be worked through and that it is not horrible. However, the comparison between Toslink and wireless networking is inappropriate. The former has stringent synchronization requirements

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread P Floding
Phil Leigh;185041 Wrote: Yes that is totally corrrect. Toslink vs. TCP/IP = apples vs. elephants. Personally I have NO issues with Toslink. It works fine. I know we can't wind back the clock but I'm sure this prejudice must date back to a time when digital was poorly understood. These days

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread regalma1
If routine ugrades to Slimserver or Mozilla is tinkering, then I am guilty of tinkering. Otherwise I am not a tinkerer. I don't particularly enjoy working with computers. Too many rounds with Windows 95, 98 and ME, not to mention SCSI have pretty much purged me of any joy I ever got from them. I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-02 Thread P Floding
regalma1;185054 Wrote: If routine ugrades to Slimserver or Mozilla is tinkering, then I am guilty of tinkering. Otherwise I am not a tinkerer. I don't particularly enjoy working with computers. Too many rounds with Windows 95, 98 and ME, not to mention SCSI have pretty much purged me of any

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread ceejay
Best way to answer the speed of access problem is to try it out - download slimserver and softsqueeze. Point slimserver at your existing mp3 collection and you will be able to see exactly how it works with a library of that size. Personally I found that 512MB on Windows wasn't quite enough - not

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread cliveb
ceejay;184505 Wrote: Personally I found that 512MB on Windows wasn't quite enough - not that Slimserver used all of that, but when there were other things going on then my total memory usage often got up to 700MB or more. Memory is cheap so I upgraded to 1GB. Just to give an alternate

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread adamslim
I reckon that amp will probably convert A to D and process/upsample, so you may not get any improvement moving from an SB3 to a Transporter. Where you will get an improvement is moving from MP3 to FLAC, and making sure you connect digitally. I'd buy an SB3 if you don't have one already, spend

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread slimkid
adamslim;184546 Wrote: I'd buy an SB3 if you don't have one already, spend some money on your computer making sure you can rip quickly (or pay to have it done) and buy some more CDs :) Adam I'd tend to agree with this idea very much. Transporter is very high level source, and it would be

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread jdbaker
That is a fine receiver, I had the Integra 8.2 in my main system before upgrading to Parasound Halo. I still have the Integra in another system but have not tried it with the SB. It does have a pure audio mode and also has up-sampling DACs. Get a SB3, hook it up both digital and analog,feed it

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread spooley
Quote , if your receiver doesn't have analog pass through, then feature where the bigest improvement in transporter is, its DAC, will be useless to you Are you saying that the reciever might take an analog signal from the Transporter, then convert it to digital and then convert it back to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread P Floding
spooley;184760 Wrote: Quote , if your receiver doesn't have analog pass through, then feature where the bigest improvement in transporter is, its DAC, will be useless to you Are you saying that the reciever might take an analog signal from the Transporter, then convert it to digital and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread empty99
spooley;184493 Wrote: I am not satisfied with the sound quality so I am considering two options: i) Escient Fireball with 2 Sony 400 CD/DVD changers ii) Transporter (I will rerip my cd's in a lossless format) What would you recommend for best quality sound and best interface (I like

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread slimkid
spooley;184760 Wrote: Quote , if your receiver doesn't have analog pass through, then feature where the bigest improvement in transporter is, its DAC, will be useless to you Are you saying that the reciever might take an analog signal from the Transporter, then convert it to digital and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread jdbaker
Quote from Integra web site For analog sources, the direct/pure audio mode can bypass all digital processing for super-high sound quality. I believe your receiver has this mode so you can bypass the internal dacs. As I stated previously I have the Integra 8.2 and it is a great piece if equipment

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread Phil Leigh
empty99;184768 Wrote: The real beauty of PC music server is its shuffle and playlist abilities, you cannot duplicate that with any disc changers, too clunky and slow to work, or if working, will greatly shorten its life due to mechanical complexity. The SB3 sound quality (either digital or

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread P Floding
jdbaker;184786 Wrote: Quote from Integra web site For analog sources, the direct/pure audio mode can bypass all digital processing for super-high sound quality. I believe your receiver has this mode so you can bypass the internal dacs. As I stated previously I have the Integra 8.2 and it is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread spooley
P Floding - I just read that section of the manual as well. Its not really very clear. So I called Integra's support line and the tech I spoke said that if there is an analog feed, there would be no processing and the signal would go out directly as analog, but to be honest I didn't get a warm

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread P Floding
spooley;184807 Wrote: P Floding - I just read that section of the manual as well. Its not really very clear. So I called Integra's support line and the tech I spoke said that if there is an analog feed, there would be no processing and the signal would go out directly as analog, but to be

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-03-01 Thread jdbaker
spooley - You have not said if you have a SB or not, if you do, hook it up to that bad boy and feed it some lossless files. My experience with the DTR 8.2 was it sounded terrific, especially with music, my move to Parasound was really about movies. I think if you feed it some quality files either

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please recommend best quality solution

2007-02-28 Thread spooley
I currently have my entire 550 cd collection ripped in MP3 format (various bit rates) and have an rca connection to my Integra DTR 5.5 receiver. I use WMP 11 as my jukebox. I am not satisfied with the sound quality so I am considering two options: i) Escient Fireball with 2 Sony 400 CD/DVD