Tomas,
Sorry to repeate myself --
i) aufs has nice README files, just try to believe them
ii) I've been asking the same question in this mailing list so
google may help you. Actually Okajima-san redirected me
to the README file and my problem was immediately solved.
BTW, GNU make has dry-r
Tomas M:
> Thank you very much for your interest. Actually I spent a lot of time
> restoring the deleted header files so I won't test that again, I am
> sorry :) I decided to go with the default 'make headers_install'
> command and then I copy the aufs_type.h header to appropriate
> location. This
>> I thought that this installs the header files in /usr/include and
>> nothing more. But I was wrong. It seems it has bad side effects. For
>> me, it removes essential files from the destination directory, like
>> /usr/include/stdio.h and others...
>
> I cannot reproduce such problem.
> Will you s
Tomas M:
> Actually I used the first method (aufs in kernel, not a module). But I
> believe that I will need aufs_type.h in my /usr/include/linux in order
> to compile aufs-utils, regardless of which method I choose, so I need
> make headers_install with INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr in both cases. Am I
>
Hello everyone, beware, I found a problem with the approach I was trying to do.
In general I thought that in order to get the aufs_type.h installed in
my system, I could simply do
make headers_install with INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr
I thought that this installs the header files in /usr/include and
not
