ncluded in
Debian's kernel as well. Both don't have aufs2-utils at the moment, but
I will upload them during the next week.
Regards,
Julian
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http
as master normally indicates the
current state of development).
Furthermore, it would have been better to have a location which supports
the git protocol, because cloning over http is really slow.
And I don't understand why you have all these 'test' commits. They are
just useles
2009/2/3 :
>
> Julian and Tommy,
>
> Julian Andres Klode:
>> That's what I would like to have, too. Just do it like udev, use 001 for th=
>> e first version, 002 for
>> the next, etc. Or simply use 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, etc. These are all good version=
>> nu
good version
numbers (the 2nd type is
actually better because you can have a version 1.0 later [which in the first
case won't work because
eg. 002 > 1.0]).
We just want a normal tarball, with the code. We want to build it externally.
That's
everything.
--
Julian Andres Klode - F
releases, or
adapt a completely new release scheme, including releases with
source trees.
Also see http://wiki.debian.org/SoftwarePackaging for some more
information on software packaging.
Thank you very much for aufs.
--
Julian Andres Klode - Free Software Developer
Debian Developer -
lease (on every Monday) is against vanilla kernel
> only. Additionally source files only, no packages.
> But I can guess Julian Andres Klode, a member of this ML who is
> maintaining debian and ubuntu modules will reply to you. :-)
>
>
> Junjiro R. Okajima
>
> ---
Am Mittwoch, den 13.08.2008, 23:16 +0900 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > But I don't know why these warning were produced.
> > Does it mean u64 in s390 is not 'long long unsigned int' or defined
> > somewhere else?
> > warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int'
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 16:29 +0200 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
> Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
> > Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 12:06 +0900 schrieb
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > Julian Andres Klode:
> > > &g
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 12:22 +0900 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > Please take a look at the attached emails.
>
> Thanks for forwarding.
> If I try cross-compiling for s390 on my ia32 debian system, where can I
> get the compiler?
Maybe http://w
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
> Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 12:06 +0900 schrieb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Julian Andres Klode:
> > > The patches fix some small issues.
> >
> > 08_bashisms.dpatch:
> > Will you explain wh
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 12:06 +0900 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Julian Andres Klode:
> > The patches fix some small issues.
>
> 08_bashisms.dpatch:
> Will you explain why 'test' is removed?
The first change from test BLAH to [ BLAH ] was more or less a mistake.
Th
The patches fix some small issues.
08_bashisms.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript
09_fixmanpage.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-
7;, but argument 7 has
> type 'ino_t'
> /build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.26/debian/build/build_s390_none_s390x_aufs/export.c:
> In function 'decode_by_dir_ino':
> /build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.26/debian/build/build_s390_none_s390x_aufs/export.c:2
ortfs_encode_fh
>
>
Please provide the following information:
- The kernel configuration /boot/config-$(uname -r)
- The output of "modinfo aufs"
- The output of "modprobe -l"
Thank you!
> Many thanks for your help
>
>
> Regards
> Martin
>
&g
>
>>
>> Junjiro Okajima
>>
> Hi,
>
> i am using the version which is actually in Debian testing.
> The version is: 20080609
Could you please retry with the version from Debian unstable
(0+20080719-1 = aufs 20080714)? [this version is planned to ship with Lenny]
Regard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
>>> Does it really damage the performance to _enable_ the option if=20
>>> udba=3Dnone or udba=3Dreval is the mount option?
>> I don't know. If it doesn't, it will be enabled in Ubuntu 8.10, and in
>> De
Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 17:03 +0200 schrieb "Jørgen P. Tjernø":
> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 16:30 +0200 schrieb "Jørgen P. Tjernø":
> >> How is a user supposed to figure out that this is the issue
> >>
Intrepid and run m-a
a-i aufs (you may also need to install module-assistant). But you also
have to remove the prebuilt module in /lib/modules/$(uname
-r)/ubuntu/fs/aufs/aufs.ko.
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Debian Maintainer | Developer | U
is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
Maybe aufs should switch to a service not sponsored by Microsoft?
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
n-ubuntu/
[1]
http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/ubuntu-aufs-with-casper-1118-ndisgtk-081-ndisgtk-in-main/
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Debian Maintainer | Developer | Ubuntu Member
try Debian: http://www.debian.org/ | my site:
Josh Boyer wrote :
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:59:07 +0200
> Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, den 23.04.2008, 13:34 -0500 schrieb Chris Engel:
> > > I can compile aufs from the latest CVS release but when I go to insmod
> > > I
exported so
> can't be called by a module.
The problem is the solution: Export it and recompile the kernel. A patch
can be found in patch/
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Debian Maintainer | Developer | Ubuntu Member
try Debian: h
ation and version of aufs,
> ie. building the package.
The version uploaded to backports.org is very old (20070806), but
should work.
I will update the snapshot in backports.org to 20080401, and update the release
in Debian unstable soon to 20080415 or next monday to 20080421.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your contributions.
>
> Julian Andres Klode:
>> I just tried to replace the do_splice_* functions with other already expo=
>> rted functions,
>> because the do_* won't be added to the Debian kernel.
>
if (unlikely(!(out->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)))
+ err = -EBADF;
+ else
+ err = out->f_op->splice_write(pipe, out, ppos, len, flags);
lockdep_on();
if (err >= 0)
au_update_fuse_h_inode(out->f_vfsmnt, out->f_dentry);
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
>> I attached two small patches from the Debian package, fixing bashisms in =
>> auplink
>> and some things related to security-inode-permission.
>
> Thanx.
> The former will be included in next Monday relea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
>>>> Find() # dir [ find_args ]
>>>> {
>>>> - local dir=3D3D"$1"
>>>>shift
>>>> - find "$dir" -xdev -noleaf $@
>>>> + find "$1" -xdev -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode:
>> I attached two small patches from the Debian package, fixing bashisms in =
>> auplink
>> and some things related to security-inode-permission.
> :::
>> diff -urNad aufs-0+20080317~/util/auplink aufs-0+20080
ank (FreeNode, OFTC)
languages: German | English
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 05_no_bashisms.dpatch by Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
##
## DP: Fix bashisms in auplink (Closes: #471288)
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad aufs-0+20080317~/util/auplink aufs-0+20080317/uti
[please write to the ML]
Robby Workman wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> Robby Workman wrote:
>>> Hi! I'm one of the maintainers of SlackBuilds.org, an unofficial
>>> project providing build scripts for applications/libraries/et al
>>> that aren&#x
ons.
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/aufs/
The snapshot you referred to is:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/aufs/aufs_0+20080129.orig.tar.gz
>
> -RW
>
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Ubuntu Member | Debian
against the skeleton of headers/Kconfigs/etc. So it is
> quite annoying to need the full sources - especially as kernel updates
> are rather frequent in Arch.
See the attached patch.
>
> Regards,
> mt
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
.
Read more at
http://juliank.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/improved-aufs-support-in-ubuntu/
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Ubuntu Member | Debian Packager | Developer
try Ubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.com/ | my site: http://jak-linux.org
Michael Haas wrote:
> [re-sending from correct email address]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>>> Julian Andres Klode:
>>>> compiling aufs with the patch for ubuntu worked for kernel 2.6.22-14.46, =
>>>> but does not work for Ubuntu's
>>>&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Julian Andres Klode:
>>> compiling aufs with the patch for ubuntu worked for kernel 2.6.22-14.46, =
>>> but does not work for Ubuntu's
>>> 2.6.24-1.2. I attached the build log.
>> Thank you for your reports.
>> I will
Hi,
compiling aufs with the patch for ubuntu worked for kernel 2.6.22-14.46, but
does not work for Ubuntu's
2.6.24-1.2. I attached the build log.
Regards,
Julian Andres Klode
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Ubuntu Member | D
This is known. The Ubuntu kernel uses AppArmor patches.
Please see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aufs/+bug/140735
Maybe sfjro could add a patch for Ubuntu's kernel to patch.
Regards,
Julian Andres Klode, Debian aufs Maintainer.
Original Patch for Ubuntu's Kernel (au
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> 3 things to reduce the diff of my debian package:
>
> 1. Why not simply apply vserver.patch? The patch only
>takes action if vserver is activated and else does
>nothing. I do this in the Debian package for some
>time now and ther
-file/f9acc63cae13/config/config-2.6.23-grml
"Patch": See attachment (aufs-grml.patch)
Could you take a look at it? Has this already been fixed?
Some other suggestions:
1. Move patches for the kernel into a subdirectory (like patches/)
Julian Andres Klode
+diff -urNad --ex
ded an NMU that changes the name of the field to
aufs_si_flags. Patch attached."
-- dann frazier
Regards,
Julian Andres Klode
--- fs/aufs/module.c 2007-09-24 11:08:02.0 -0600
+++ fs/aufs/module.c 2007-09-27 13:24:49.0 -0600
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int __init
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> Package: aufs
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> your package fails to build on ia64, see
>> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-modules-extra-2.6;ver=2.6.22-2;arch=ia64;stamp=119083848
pstream's ML, so this problem can be fixed in the next
upstream release.
--
Julian Andres Klode
IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode, GimpNet)
Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049)
Debian Wiki:http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode
42 matches
Mail list logo
