On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17:33PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
Why would we need that? Keep it simple. People can setup their own repos
if they want, just as I did [1].
2. User provided binaries (if case anyone wants to volunteer) (this should
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17:33PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
Why would we need that? Keep it simple. People can setup their own repos
if they want, just as I
Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 20:03:14, Gaetan Bisson a écrit :
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
[community] a few packages I have been maintaining on the AUR so far,
but
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
[community] a few packages I have been maintaining on the AUR so far,
but which are just a bit
pyopencl
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31416
Cheers,
Stéphane
problem with packages which use opencl(at least with nvidia) is that
it requires the cuda toolkit, a binary package that I'm not sure about
the redistribution rights(should read the license)
and then look how to
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 12:59:48, Ionuț Bîru a écrit :
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
[community] a few packages
On 17 November 2010 13:15, Imanol Celaya ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org wrote:
pyopencl
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31416
Cheers,
Stéphane
problem with packages which use opencl(at least with nvidia) is that
it requires the cuda toolkit, a binary package that I'm not sure
On 17/11/10 21:59, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
[community] a few packages I have been maintaining on the
2010/11/17 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
On 17 November 2010 13:15, Imanol Celaya ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org
wrote:
pyopencl
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31416
Cheers,
Stéphane
problem with packages which use opencl(at least with nvidia) is that
it requires
On 17 November 2010 13:29, Imanol Celaya ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org wrote:
2010/11/17 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
On 17 November 2010 13:15, Imanol Celaya ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org
wrote:
pyopencl
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31416
Cheers,
Stéphane
On 11/17/2010 02:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 17/11/10 21:59, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
[community] a
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
schrieb Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com:
I think it's kind of hard for me to see why I should maintain a
package that's already been discarded by its developer. In my opinion
such packages should be moved to [unsupported] where the one more two
people who
Am Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:30:02 +1300
schrieb Jonathan Conder jonno.conder+a...@gmail.com:
I think it would be nice if people who click the Notify button get
emailed when the package is updated, and not just when someone
comments. Some maintainers don't say anything when they update.
You don't
After the mass cleanup of [extra] ubuntulooks is now in AUR twice.
ubuntulooks (moved from [extra])
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43548
gtk-engine-ubuntulooks
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11324
The latter has some patches. I don't know what they are doing. But I'd
suggest
On 17/11/10 22:35, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/17/2010 02:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 17/11/10 21:59, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 07:18:43, Lukáš Jirkovský a écrit :
On 17 November 2010 13:15, Imanol Celaya ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org
wrote:
pyopencl
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31416
Cheers,
Stéphane
problem with packages which use opencl(at least with nvidia)
On 17/11/10 22:45, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
schrieb Kaiting Chenkaitocr...@gmail.com:
I think it's kind of hard for me to see why I should maintain a
package that's already been discarded by its developer. In my opinion
such packages should be moved to
and then look how to handle the opencl dependiencies as both amd and
nvidia provide icd and in theory both can cohexist(so maybe a
provides=('opencl') ?)
so, yes, opencl maybe better to wait
Imanol
This is a part of the reason why I said I will wait before uploading. See
FS#20558
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
After the mass cleanup of [extra] ubuntulooks is now in AUR twice.
ubuntulooks (moved from [extra])
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43548
gtk-engine-ubuntulooks
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11324
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 13:59:25 Heiko Baums wrote:
After the mass cleanup of [extra] ubuntulooks is now in AUR twice.
ubuntulooks (moved from [extra])
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43548
gtk-engine-ubuntulooks
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11324
The latter
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 11:17 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17:33PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
Why would we need that? Keep it
2010/11/17 Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com:
How can we make the AUR even better? I'll start:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
+1 but I think distributed is not necessary at all, but keeping the
revisions of a PKGBUILD or the rest of the files will be nice.
2. User provided
2010/11/17 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
On 17/11/10 22:45, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:40 -0500
schrieb Kaiting Chenkaitocr...@gmail.com:
I think it's kind of hard for me to see why I should maintain a
package that's already been discarded by its developer. In my
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 15:51:22 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
Why not move them to a graveyard repo, that would be called
[unmaintained]. It would contain binary packages that belonged
formerly to [community] but are explicitly not maintained anymore.
That would allow people who use them to
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Alessio Sergi ase...@archlinux.us wrote:
Hi TUs,
please remove plasma-ihatethecashew-plasmoid [1]. It's replaced by
ihatethecashew-plasmoid [2] now.
Deleted, thanks.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:01:48 -0200
Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org wrote:
2010/11/17 Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com:
How can we make the AUR even better? I'll start:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
+1 but I think distributed is not necessary at all, but keeping the
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:03:14 +0100
Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain
in [community] a few packages I have been maintaining on the AUR
You are Devs (kinda), I assume from that, that you are a trustworthy
person as the people we all trust(devs) trust you.
I see no problem with you maintaining a few packages in [community] as
long as you - like this - say what you want to move in or out to/of the
repository and wait at least
Thanks for thinking about AUR, tough I don't like most of your
proposals. ;-)
That's fine. That's why I asked. I like most of my proposals but I've been
around long enough to realize that what I like and what other people like
are usually different.
I really would like to see some sort of
2010/11/17 Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com:
You are Devs (kinda), I assume from that, that you are a trustworthy
person as the people we all trust(devs) trust you.
I see no problem with you maintaining a few packages in [community] as
long as you - like this - say what you want to move in
2010/11/18 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
2010/11/17 Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com:
You are Devs (kinda), I assume from that, that you are a trustworthy
person as the people we all trust(devs) trust you.
I see no problem with you maintaining a few packages in [community] as
long
+1
This is no different from a new TU. There's no need for an audit or
even for them to ask us when they deem something suitable for
[community] (it should be in accordance to the TU Packaging
Guidelines; 10 votes || 1% usage anyway).
I'm confused as to the difference between a Trusted
On 11/17/10 14:32, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Thanks for thinking about AUR, tough I don't like most of your
proposals. ;-)
That's fine. That's why I asked. I like most of my proposals but I've been
around long enough to realize that what I like and what other people like
are usually different.
I
If there's anything I can do to help implement this, I can spend some time
on it. (I have a few AUR packages,
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=idupreeSeB=m , and have used ABS,
but otherwise am not too familiar with how Arch's infrastructure is set up
currently.)
I'm going to toy
On 18 November 2010 04:14, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
This is no different from a new TU. There's no need for an audit or
even for them to ask us when they deem something suitable for
[community] (it should be in accordance to the TU Packaging
Guidelines; 10 votes || 1%
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
How can we make the AUR even better? I'll start:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
I like this idea. At least the ability to track changes in PKGBUILDs
would be fun. Similar to a wiki's revision history.
Though a distributed VCS and not a centralized VCS is not really that
necessary I use git mainly because it is fast, not because it is
distributed. So I don't see why a distributed VCS would be any worse
than a centralized one. The AUR is never going to be merging from
another repo
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
... I don't
believe a centralized VCS is capable of this.
Just so you know, a centralized VCS like svn or cvs can do the same
thing. Just to reiterate, my personal preference is still git. I think
it will be best
On Wed 17 Nov 2010 22:22 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 17/11/10 21:59, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
Just so you know, a centralized VCS like svn or cvs can do the same thing.
How does one commit to a local repository using SVN?
Sure I suppose if the LDAP spontaneously configures itself and
populates itself with data that is just great. I was talking about
configuring LDAP, deploying LDAP,
On Tue 16 Nov 2010 23:17 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
How can we make the AUR even better? I'll start:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
2. User provided binaries (if case anyone wants to volunteer) (this should
probably be carefully controlled)
3. Time-adjusted 'relevance'
How does one commit to a local repository using SVN?
I meant that you can do a 'svn update' or 'cvs update' to merge
changes from the server into your working dir.
--
-Justin
I meant that you can do a 'svn update' or 'cvs update' to merge changes
from the server into your working dir.
But you cannot commit to your local repository. Nor can you branch, tag,
etc. Basically you can't do anything useful with a traditional VCS in a
decentralized structure like the AUR.
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:53 -0500, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 11/17/10 14:32, Kaiting Chen wrote:
I really would like to see some sort of integrated VCS system though. It's
easy to tell what a new release in the official repositories contains by
using the SVN interface. No such thing exists
On 18 November 2010 09:48, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
I'd almost say I'd like to see something like a Launchpad or Sourceforge
for the AUR, with everything you need available via a more-or-less
homogenous interface. But all features should be accessible via the
command line as the
45 matches
Mail list logo
