On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:40 AM, jwbirdsong
wrote:
> Along these same lines we should delete pigdin-light-msngroup (1)
Removed, thanks.
On 31.08.2011 03:11, Loui Chang wrote:
> It was a pleasure to work with you folks. See you around!
>
Thanks for your work and good luck.
--
Florian Pritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
As discussed in a previous forgotten thread [1]
consider to remove, again
firefox-extension-firebug-stable [2], replaced by a simpler
firefox-firebug [3], updated to work with latest ff 6.0.1
Votes could be merged.
The main reason is a better naming consistency, since
firefox-extension-firebug-s
Am 31.08.2011 19:49, schrieb speps:
Hi, some stuff to delete here
[ 1] fftw-thread> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
[ 2] csound5> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7600
[ 3] csound5-cecilia> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44816
[ 4] csound5-cvs> https://aur
Am 31.08.2011 17:25, schrieb Cédric Girard:
cinelerra-transitions [1] is orphaned. Its original maintainer was the
upstream owner. The source and website is dead.
As it claims to be "Transitions for cinelerra mostly from akirad and
OpenShot", I've uploaded a PKGBUILD cinelerra-swtc [2] containin
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:04:38 +0200
Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 31.08.2011 19:49, schrieb speps:
> > Hi, some stuff to delete here
> >
> > [ 1] fftw-thread> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
> > [ 2] csound5> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7600
> > [ 3] csound5-cecilia>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Stefan Husmann
wrote:
> removed [1]
Thanks.
--
Cédric Girard
*Dead repo due to dead project. I can't find any mirrors:*
qutim-protocol-icq-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33004).
ICQ support is now built into qutim anyway (http://qutim.org/)
omvviewer-artwork-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24456). It
is now built into omvviewer
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-08-06 12:14:14 +0200:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:29:13 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > > Agreed. I'm still against completely disabling HTTP. We will use HTTPs
> > > for all links by d
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-08-06 12:14:14 +0200:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > > On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:29:13 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > > > Agreed. I'm still a
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-08-06 12:14:14 +0200:
> > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > > > On Sat,
On 01/09/11 11:51, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-08-06 12:14:14 +0200:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> [...]
> > > I sadly followed this discussion only remotely when it was ongoing, so I
On 01/09/11 12:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
[...]
I sadly followed this discussion only r
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 13:01:50 +0200:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200:
> > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > [...]
>
On 01/09/11 11:51, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-08-06 12:14:14 +0200:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200,
On 01.09.2011 11:02, speps wrote:
> As discussed in a previous forgotten thread [1]
>
> consider to remove, again
>
> firefox-extension-firebug-stable [2], replaced by a simpler
> firefox-firebug [3], updated to work with latest ff 6.0.1
> Votes could be merged.
done
> firefox-extension-firebug
Am 01.09.2011 13:01, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:
archlinux.org -> http -> no login anyway
bbs.archlinux.org -> https-> separate login page
wiki.archlinux.org -> https-> separate login page
bugs.archlinux.org -> https-> login on main page
aur.archlinux
On 01.09.2011 12:07, gadget3000 wrote:
> *Dead repo due to dead project. I can't find any mirrors:*
> qutim-protocol-icq-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33004).
> ICQ support is now built into qutim anyway (http://qutim.org/)
removed
> omvviewer-artwork-git (https://aur.archlinux.o
Sergej,
We spent a week rebuilding packages to get tcp_wrappers out of [core]
and out of the repos. Now I see that you've moved it back into
[community]. What the hell? Were you going to start recompiling packages
against tcp_wrappers and adding it back as a dep? Not acceptable. We all
made this d
Dave,
we should not recompile anything. But it is usefull package with 24
votes which has many dependencies in AUR. It is just a way to make
things easier for guys who want to use tcp_wrappers.
I assume all developers build packages in chroots and it should not
break anything even if some develo
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> we should not recompile anything. But it is usefull package with 24
> votes which has many dependencies in AUR. It is just a way to make
> things easier for guys who want to use tcp_wrappers.
I'm sure that whoever wants to use tcp_wrappers,
Hi,
Please remove grub-legacy-gfx
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50986 . I initially uploaded
it as a replacament for grub-gfx
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2416 but now its just a
duplicate of grub-gfx. TIA.
Regards.
Keshav
On 1 September 2011 17:22, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> Hi,
> Please remove grub-legacy-gfx
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50986 . I initially uploaded
> it as a replacament for grub-gfx
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2416 but now its just a
> duplicate of grub-gfx. TIA.
>
>
Excerpts from Thomas Bächler's message of 2011-09-01 14:16:20 +0200:
> Am 01.09.2011 13:01, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:
> archlinux.org -> http -> no login anyway
> bbs.archlinux.org -> https-> separate login page
> wiki.archlinux.org -> https-> separate login page
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of
> trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and custom rules for every page)
> for what could be achieved by simply defaulting to https?
>
The rules are included with
Excerpts from Cédric Girard's message of 2011-09-01 18:05:36 +0200:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Philipp Überbacher
> wrote:
>
> > Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of
> > trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and custom rules for every page)
> > for what
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:05:01PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> we should not recompile anything. But it is usefull package with 24
> votes which has many dependencies in AUR. It is just a way to make
> things easier for guys who want to use tcp_wrappers.
>
> I assume all developer
On 09/01/2011 07:52 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:05:01PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Dave,
we should not recompile anything. But it is usefull package with 24
votes which has many dependencies in AUR. It is just a way to make
things easier for guys who want to use tcp
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200
Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of
> trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and custom rules for every page)
> for what could be achieved by simply defaulting to https?
I don't really understand
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> I don't really understand why it's so important to break existing links by
> forcing everyone onto the https page.
>
And what in rewriting http://aur.archlinux.org/foo into
https://aur.archlinux.org/foo is breaking links ?
>
> What happ
Excerpts from Gordon JC Pearce's message of 2011-09-01 20:15:28 +0200:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200
> Philipp Überbacher wrote:
>
> > Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of
> > trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and custom rules for every page)
> > fo
*Dead repo due to dead project. I can't find any mirrors:*
evil-poison-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27852)
qutim-protocol-mrim-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33005).
Unsure if mrim is built into qutim now or not.
axkb-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=
On 1 September 2011 17:05, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> Dave,
>
> we should not recompile anything. But it is usefull package with 24
> votes which has many dependencies in AUR. It is just a way to make
> things easier for guys who want to use tcp_wrappers.
>
> I assume all developers build packages in
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:27 PM, gadget3000 wrote:
> *Dead repo due to dead project. I can't find any mirrors:*
> evil-poison-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27852)
>
removed
> qutim-protocol-mrim-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33005).
>
didn't remove because I d
On 02.09.2011 00:48, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
And tomorrow we'll get some Feature Request with the title "Build X
with tcp_wrappers support" - Just add it to depends array.
Sure.
I moved it to community with 24 votes.
Return it back with resetting vote counter to zero.
Now it has 55 votes.
Flas
2011/9/1 Philipp Überbacher :
> Excerpts from Gordon JC Pearce's message of 2011-09-01 20:15:28 +0200:
>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200
>> Philipp Überbacher wrote:
>>
>> > Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of
>> > trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and
Am Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:57:51 -0300
schrieb rafael ff1 :
> I normally look for AUR packages in my google search engine, in case
> I'm not already in AUR interface. Since https is the default login,
> google search find the http interface.
> That's not much bad, but if I want to login after that, I c
On 09/01/11 18:57, rafael ff1 wrote:
I normally look for AUR packages in my google search engine, in case
I'm not already in AUR interface. Since https is the default login,
google search find the http interface.
Can we convince Google-search to link to the HTTPS version, I wonder?
-Isaac
39 matches
Mail list logo