Re: [aur-general] please add -depth 1 to makepkg git clone

2013-04-04 Thread SpinFlo
if add --depth 1, please set to option enable or disable it 2013/4/5 Tai-Lin Chu : > you mean pkgver()? > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Daniel Micay wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote: >>> 1. save bandwidth >>> 2. less wait >>> >>> why not add --depth 1 :) >> >> If

Re: [aur-general] please add -depth 1 to makepkg git clone

2013-04-04 Thread Tai-Lin Chu
you mean pkgver()? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Daniel Micay wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote: >> 1. save bandwidth >> 2. less wait >> >> why not add --depth 1 :) > > If you're using a git package, I assume you're updating it at some > frequency and you only have a

Re: [aur-general] please add -depth 1 to makepkg git clone

2013-04-04 Thread Daniel Micay
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Tai-Lin Chu wrote: > 1. save bandwidth > 2. less wait > > why not add --depth 1 :) If you're using a git package, I assume you're updating it at some frequency and you only have a full clone on the first build.

Re: [aur-general] please add -depth 1 to makepkg git clone

2013-04-04 Thread Doug Newgard
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 23:12:29 -0700 > From: tailin...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: [aur-general] please add -depth 1 to makepkg git clone > > 1. save bandwidth > 2. less wait > > why not add --depth 1 :) Please don't, it will scre

[aur-general] please add -depth 1 to makepkg git clone

2013-04-04 Thread Tai-Lin Chu
1. save bandwidth 2. less wait why not add --depth 1 :)

[aur-general] Merge Request: deluge-stable -> deluge-stable-git

2013-04-04 Thread William Giokas
TUs, deluge-stable[0] should be renamed to deluge-stable-git[1]. I have uplodaed the latter, and would just like the comments and votes transferred. [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deluge-stable/ [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deluge-stable-git/ Thank you, -- William Giokas |

Re: [aur-general] ttf-google-webfonts{,-distilled,-git,-hg} mess

2013-04-04 Thread Limao Luo
On 04/04/2013 05:15 AM, Alucryd wrote: On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 08:42 +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: AFAIK PKGBUILDs can still implement their own VCS downloads in build(), so, why not have it only pull the relevant paths? A quick google gave me [1], you get the idea... cheers! mar77i [1] http://sta

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-04-04 Thread 小龙 陈
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:27:12 -0400 > From: li...@eyanulis.net > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request > > On 4/4/2013 16:09, 小龙 陈 wrote: > > > >> From: aluc...@gmail.com > >> T

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-04-04 Thread Eric Yanulis
On 4/4/2013 16:09, 小龙 陈 wrote: > >> From: aluc...@gmail.com >> To: aur-general@archlinux.org >> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:52:15 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request >> >> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:42 +0200, Gavin Costello wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-04-04 Thread 小龙 陈
> From: aluc...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:52:15 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request > > On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:42 +0200, Gavin Costello wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please remove the package cisco-vpnclie

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-04-04 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:42 +0200, Gavin Costello wrote: > Hi, > > Please remove the package cisco-vpnclient, as this product has reached > end-of-life: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5743/ps5699/ps2308/end_of_life_c51-680819.html > > Also, openconnect in extra provides th

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: keepass2

2013-04-04 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 18:39 -0400, Jason St. John wrote: > The package keepass2 appears to be a duplicate of keepass. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/keepass2/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/keepass/ > > Jason Merged, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] deletion request for smarbs packages

2013-04-04 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:46 +0200, Lucky wrote: > Hello, > > please remove these packages because no upstream updates for years and > nobody uses this packages. > > ruby-smarbs > ruby-smarbs-git

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request

2013-04-04 Thread Alucryd
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:33 -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > I've renamed package "opensmtpd-portable" to "opensmtpd-snapshot". > The rename is due to upstream having made a stable release (and this > package will track the snapshots as it always has). > Could someone please merge the former in

[aur-general] Merge Request

2013-04-04 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
I've renamed package "opensmtpd-portable" to "opensmtpd-snapshot". The rename is due to upstream having made a stable release (and this package will track the snapshots as it always has). Could someone please merge the former into the latter? Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpdOeEh4ByLT.pgp D

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 04.04.2013 16:06, schrieb Alucryd: > > On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 09:52 -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote: >> >>> Gary van der Merwe wrote: >>> >>> On Thu 04 Apr 2013 15:41:27 SAST, Alucryd wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:26 +0200, Gary

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 04.04.2013 16:06, schrieb Alucryd: On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 09:52 -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote: Gary van der Merwe wrote: On Thu 04 Apr 2013 15:41:27 SAST, Alucryd wrote: On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:26 +0200, Gary van der Merwe wrote: Hi all. I'm the one wrote the Bazaar makepkg support, so an

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Alucryd
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 09:52 -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote: > Gary van der Merwe wrote: > > >On Thu 04 Apr 2013 15:41:27 SAST, Alucryd wrote: > >> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:26 +0200, Gary van der Merwe wrote: > >>> Hi all. > >>> > >>> I'm the one wrote the Bazaar makepkg support, so any bugs are my >

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Daniel Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Gary van der Merwe wrote: >On Thu 04 Apr 2013 15:41:27 SAST, Alucryd wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:26 +0200, Gary van der Merwe wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I'm the one wrote the Bazaar makepkg support, so any bugs are my >fault. >>> >>> >>> On

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Gary van der Merwe
On Thu 04 Apr 2013 15:41:27 SAST, Alucryd wrote: On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:26 +0200, Gary van der Merwe wrote: Hi all. I'm the one wrote the Bazaar makepkg support, so any bugs are my fault. On 04/04/2013 10:24, Stefan Husmann wrote: ==> Retrieving sources... -> Branching http://bzr.savan

[aur-general] deletion request for smarbs packages

2013-04-04 Thread Lucky
Hello, please remove these packages because no upstream updates for years and nobody uses this packages. ruby-smarbs ruby-smarbs-git smarbs-svn

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Alucryd
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:26 +0200, Gary van der Merwe wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm the one wrote the Bazaar makepkg support, so any bugs are my fault. > > > On 04/04/2013 10:24, Stefan Husmann wrote: > > ==> Retrieving sources... > >-> Branching http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/xwidget > > ..

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Gary van der Merwe
Hi all. I'm the one wrote the Bazaar makepkg support, so any bugs are my fault. On 04/04/2013 10:24, Stefan Husmann wrote: ==> Retrieving sources... -> Branching http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/xwidget ... bzr: ERROR: No such file: u'/home/haawda/paketierung/maintained_by_me/emacs-xwidg

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Alucryd
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 13:10 +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Husmann > wrote: > [...] > > > > this gives : > > [haawda@frege 4.1]$ LANG=C makepkg > > ==> Making package: emacs-xwidget-bzr 101273-1 (Thu Apr 4 > > 10:19:00 CEST 2013) > > ==> Checking runtime depe

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Martti Kühne
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: [...] > > this gives : > [haawda@frege 4.1]$ LANG=C makepkg > ==> Making package: emacs-xwidget-bzr 101273-1 (Thu Apr 4 > 10:19:00 CEST 2013) > ==> Checking runtime dependencies... > ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... > ==> Retrieving sou

Re: [aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > I have problems to find a good solution for a bazaar based PKGBUILD to do > an autobump of pkgver. > > I use this PKGBUILD > # Maintainer: Stefan Husmann > # based on a PKGBUILD of Mathias Nedrebø nedrebo.org> > > pkgname=emacs-

Re: [aur-general] ttf-google-webfonts{,-distilled,-git,-hg} mess

2013-04-04 Thread Alessio Sergi
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Jason St. John wrote: > I am the current maintainer of the AUR package > ttf-google-webfonts-hg[4], and I'm bothered by the mess of various > packages there are for Google's Web Fonts project. It's not at all > KISS in its current state. > > There are currently fo

[aur-general] pacman 4.1 (makepkg 4.1) bazaar pkgver autobump problem

2013-04-04 Thread Stefan Husmann
Hello, I have problems to find a good solution for a bazaar based PKGBUILD to do an autobump of pkgver. I use this PKGBUILD # Maintainer: Stefan Husmann # based on a PKGBUILD of Mathias Nedrebø nedrebo.org> pkgname=emacs-xwidget-bzr pkgver=101273 pkgrel=1 arch=('i686' 'x86_64') pkgdesc="Emac

Re: [aur-general] ttf-google-webfonts{,-distilled,-git,-hg} mess

2013-04-04 Thread Alucryd
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 08:42 +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: > AFAIK PKGBUILDs can still implement their own VCS downloads in > build(), so, why not have it only pull the relevant paths? > A quick google gave me [1], you get the idea... > > cheers! > mar77i > > [1] > http://stackoverflow.com/questions

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-04-04 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days