=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 11 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 11 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:24:37AM +0100, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 26/11/2013 16:00, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2,
kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time.
docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:56:44AM +0100, Ike Devolder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:24:37AM +0100, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 26/11/2013 16:00, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2,
kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a
Hi,
I started moving lxc-docker to [community], before seeing this thread.
It's currently *not* pushed as an official package, but a
work-in-progress PKGBUILD in svn.
Removing it from SVN, while waiting for the naming issue to be decided.
The moment the docker name is free, I'm ready to push
Hi again,
Sébastien Luttringer has got it covered, I will not push anything
except in cooperation with him.
- Alexander / xyproto
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:20:43AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 27 November 2013 04:43, Lieven Moors lievenmo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think technically, ntk-git should provide
ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release
of ntk.
You can depend on ntk-git, but a better
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:28:17PM -0200, Gabriel B. Casella wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Lieven Moors lievenmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package
(non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of
ntk. The package ntk is not yet
On 28 November 2013 02:27, Lieven Moors lievenmo...@gmail.com wrote:
With devel functionality, do you mean header files? Wouldn't they
be needed to build non-daw-git anyway?
I meant experimental functionality (i.e. development branch).
The problem is that ntk-git has been in a state of
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:41:42AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 28 November 2013 02:27, Lieven Moors lievenmo...@gmail.com wrote:
With devel functionality, do you mean header files? Wouldn't they
be needed to build non-daw-git anyway?
I meant experimental functionality (i.e.
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of fusion-icon-fixed. It needs to be removed because
it's a duplicate of fusion-icon.
Thank you.
--
Pantelis Panayiotou
Operations Manager, Miliaris Limited
Louki Akrita Evanthous 2, Office 102, 1101 Nicosia
Email: i...@miliaris.eu | Web: www.miliaris.eu | Tel:
spark-git currently conflicts with the spark im client.
Short of renaming the other one spark-im, I've submitted a proposal
for sparklines-git instead. I also renamed the binary itself
sparklines so not to create a conflict with the spark im client (whose
binary is also called spark).
11 matches
Mail list logo
