Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

2015-07-14 Thread David Phillips
I should add that I am not yet advocating such a solution. As others have said, the spam problem is not large enough to warrant it.

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

2015-07-14 Thread David Phillips
I agree with gt. Not meaning to bike shed further, but if we had a 'not constructive' or 'destructive' flag, and have the comment appear grayed out and flagged for moderation after n flags, this would be a more sane implementation of 'voting' on comments.

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

2015-07-14 Thread gt
On 14 July 2015 18:54:11 GMT+05:30, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: >Em 14-07-2015 07:01, Prakhar Singh escreveu: >> You can also limit the number messages a person can post. And +1 for >> moderation. Apart from spam, people start discussions, chats, etc in >> comments. There is no way to stop that. A

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Unsure whether to adopt, wait for maintainer to re-upload, and/or merge packages

2015-07-14 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 14-07-2015 12:26, ShadowKyogre escreveu: I was planning to wait until August to make a decision, but, like the title says, I'm not sure whether I should just submit updated packages on the AUR4 that point to the same sources as magicseteditor-mtg, wait for elegua to re-upload the packages fo

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Unsure whether to adopt, wait for maintainer to re-upload, and/or merge packages

2015-07-14 Thread Javier Domingo Cansino
AFAIK time was given to allocate the packages to authors. I think it's OK to proceed. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 17:26 ShadowKyogre wrote: > These were the original uploaded PKGBUILDs, still referencing to a stale > source: > 1. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg/ > 2. https://aur4

[aur-general] [AUR4] Unsure whether to adopt, wait for maintainer to re-upload, and/or merge packages

2015-07-14 Thread ShadowKyogre
These were the original uploaded PKGBUILDs, still referencing to a stale source: 1. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg/ 2. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg-phyrexian/ These were the uploads with the new content re-hosting, but the maintainer hasn't contacted me back

Re: [aur-general] forgot the username for my AUR account

2015-07-14 Thread Dennis Værum
On 2015-07-14 15:39, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 at 15:32:46, Dennis Værum wrote: the account is registered under this mail and I can get a link to reset the accounts password, but I still need the username. Can someone send the username to this mail? If you use the password rese

Re: [aur-general] forgot the username for my AUR account

2015-07-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 at 15:32:46, Dennis Værum wrote: > the account is registered under this mail and I can get a link to reset > the accounts password, but I still need the username. Can someone send > the username to this mail? If you use the password reset form from the aur4 subdomain [1], you

[aur-general] forgot the username for my AUR account

2015-07-14 Thread Dennis Værum
the account is registered under this mail and I can get a link to reset the accounts password, but I still need the username. Can someone send the username to this mail?

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

2015-07-14 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 14-07-2015 07:01, Prakhar Singh escreveu: You can also limit the number messages a person can post. And +1 for moderation. Apart from spam, people start discussions, chats, etc in comments. There is no way to stop that. And +1 for layered filters. For example, if two people tag each other repe

Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR

2015-07-14 Thread Prakhar Singh
You can also limit the number messages a person can post. And +1 for moderation. Apart from spam, people start discussions, chats, etc in comments. There is no way to stop that. And +1 for layered filters. For example, if two people tag each other repeatedly you can flag it as a chat, and so on. R

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-07-14 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days