On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Levente Polyak
wrote:
> If you are logged in to the AUR, use the right upper corner "Package
> Actions" on the package's AUR page to request a proper action (f.e. delete).
There is no *delete* action. I only see:
* View PKGBUILD / View
Hi,
I found out why the AUR bazel package didn't work for me: the problem was
that ~/.bazelrc needs to point to %workspace%:/opt/bazel/base_workspace/
(as explained in the comments here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bazel/). So now everything works and the
PKGBUILD is cleaner :).
One more
Am 11.11.2015 um 15:44 schrieb Rodolphe Breard:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm not a packaging expert, however I noticed something that should be
> improved:
>
>> license=('custom:"Copyright (c) 2014 ternes3 / reBTSOFT"
>> src:https://github.com/ternes3/TouchControl-for-Android#license')
>
> This is a MIT
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 16 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
On 12/11/2015 09:45, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> MIT and other BSD like license flavours _are_ custom licenses.
>
Indeed, they are. I chose poor wording to express myself, so here is a
quote from the PKGBUILD wiki page that shows what I wanted to say:
> For the sake of the license array, it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12.11.2015 10:55, Felix E. Klee wrote:
> Anyhow, my main question remains: How do I get vncdesk deleted?
* Click on File Request
* Choose Request Type: Deletion
regards,
Stefan
- --
erdfisch
Stefan Auditor, Frank Holldorff & Fabian Lorenzen
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Stefan Auditor
wrote:
> * Click on File Request
> * Choose Request Type: Deletion
Done. Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
>
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the
On 12/11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> > dependency is missing.
>
On 12-11-15 10:56, Pieter ROBYNS wrote:
Hi,
I found out why the AUR bazel package didn't work for me: the problem was
that ~/.bazelrc needs to point to %workspace%:/opt/bazel/base_workspace/
(as explained in the comments here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bazel/). So now everything works
Am 11.11.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
>
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
>
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100
"G. Schlisio" :
> is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU
> to adress with a complaint now?
Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail:
> Request #4315 has been accepted by Dragonlord [1].
> [1]
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:53:27PM +0100, Jens Adam wrote:
> Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100
> "G. Schlisio" :
>
> > is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU
> > to adress with a complaint now?
>
> Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail:
>
> > Request #4315
14 matches
Mail list logo