Re: [aur-general] How to remove package?

2015-11-12 Thread Felix E. Klee
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Levente Polyak wrote: > If you are logged in to the AUR, use the right upper corner "Package > Actions" on the package's AUR page to request a proper action (f.e. delete). There is no *delete* action. I only see: * View PKGBUILD / View

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for tensorflow-git

2015-11-12 Thread Pieter ROBYNS
Hi, I found out why the AUR bazel package didn't work for me: the problem was that ~/.bazelrc needs to point to %workspace%:/opt/bazel/base_workspace/ (as explained in the comments here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bazel/). So now everything works and the PKGBUILD is cleaner :). One more

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for touchcontrol-android

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.11.2015 um 15:44 schrieb Rodolphe Breard: > Hi, > > > I'm not a packaging expert, however I noticed something that should be > improved: > >> license=('custom:"Copyright (c) 2014 ternes3 / reBTSOFT" >> src:https://github.com/ternes3/TouchControl-for-Android#license') > > This is a MIT

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-11-12 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for touchcontrol-android

2015-11-12 Thread Rodolphe Breard
On 12/11/2015 09:45, Stefan Husmann wrote: > MIT and other BSD like license flavours _are_ custom licenses. > Indeed, they are. I chose poor wording to express myself, so here is a quote from the PKGBUILD wiki page that shows what I wanted to say: > For the sake of the license array, it is

Re: [aur-general] How to remove package?

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Auditor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12.11.2015 10:55, Felix E. Klee wrote: > Anyhow, my main question remains: How do I get vncdesk deleted? * Click on File Request * Choose Request Type: Deletion regards, Stefan - -- erdfisch Stefan Auditor, Frank Holldorff & Fabian Lorenzen

Re: [aur-general] How to remove package?

2015-11-12 Thread Felix E. Klee
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Stefan Auditor wrote: > * Click on File Request > * Choose Request Type: Deletion Done. Thanks!

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread Simon Hanna
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this > dependency is missing. > > I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 12/11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages,

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was > > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this > > dependency is missing. >

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for tensorflow-git

2015-11-12 Thread LoneVVolf
On 12-11-15 10:56, Pieter ROBYNS wrote: Hi, I found out why the AUR bazel package didn't work for me: the problem was that ~/.bazelrc needs to point to %workspace%:/opt/bazel/base_workspace/ (as explained in the comments here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bazel/). So now everything works

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread G. Schlisio
Am 11.11.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera: > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this > dependency is missing. > > I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that >

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread Jens Adam
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100 "G. Schlisio" : > is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU > to adress with a complaint now? Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail: > Request #4315 has been accepted by Dragonlord [1]. > [1]

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread Jaroslav Lichtblau
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:53:27PM +0100, Jens Adam wrote: > Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100 > "G. Schlisio" : > > > is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU > > to adress with a complaint now? > > Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail: > > > Request #4315