Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-12 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was > > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this >

[aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

2015-11-11 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
have this package restored? On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, at 12:49, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, at 12:37, G. Schlisio wrote: > > >> fordprefect [1] filed a deletion request for python2-radicale [2]: > > >> > > >> this is an ou

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD that downloads ilegal content

2015-07-06 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-07-06 13:16, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 05/07/15 01:39 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > There's a PKGBUILD[1] on the AUR that downloads a binary that is illegal > > to distribute (due to licensing, it may only be distributed in source > > form). > > > &

[aur-general] PKGBUILD that downloads ilegal content

2015-07-05 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2015-July/007698.html -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

2015-06-25 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015, at 12:50, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard > wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300 > > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Why not just name them the sa

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

2015-06-25 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
gver::http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz";) md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100') source_x86_64=("$pkgname-$pkgver::http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz";) md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff') package() { tar xf $pkgname-$pkgver ... } -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Git over HTTPS

2015-06-19 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ot, then stop creating tainted contributions at work. Cheers, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] How the "Popularity" value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

2015-06-19 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
purpose it intends to serve, I believe the proper word is "trending", not "popularity". -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Merging ruby-jekyll into a single package

2015-05-19 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
was implemented > to make the package management automatic. The problem isn't so much as a maintainer, but rather for downstream users (circular dependency issue, or too many packages for just one actual program). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to rig

[aur-general] Merging ruby-jekyll into a single package

2015-05-16 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
table? I know we usually don't bundle stuff like this in AUR, but this seems like a strong exception, since we're talking about packages with mutual codependency. Thoughts? Opinions? -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Introducing Liveroot

2015-03-31 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ts, both for on-topicness and for greater reach. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR orphaning/deletion/merging method

2015-02-10 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
te emails being leaked, since altering this header makes MUAs behave in erroneous ways (the "Reply" button does the same as the "Reply to all". See the link in my original message for all the negative implications. > > Regards, > Marcel -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because w

Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR orphaning/deletion/merging method

2015-02-10 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
s the from the list's headers of your mail: > > "Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:14:59 -0300 > > From: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR > orpha

Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR orphaning/deletion/merging method

2015-02-06 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-02-06 10:01, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:46:44 -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > >I *tried* to reply off list, but I now realize I did not. It seems I > >can't reply off-list anyway, since the list is altering the Reply-To, > >making it impo

Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR orphaning/deletion/merging method

2015-02-05 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-02-04 22:15, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > On 04/02, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > >(sending this off-list) > > > > Hate to break it to you, but you did not. ;) > > -- > Sincerely, > Johannes Löthberg > PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 > https://th

Re: [aur-general] [RFC] command in PKGBUILD to select archlinux mirror to download from

2015-02-05 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
y to install in /usr/lib32. > > Also, in lib32-pam's case, the source array uses the tarball > "pam_unix2-2.9.1.tar.bz2" stored in Arch repository, just like ''pam' > package. > > So, as you might notice, it is not simply a matter of multilib >

Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR orphaning/deletion/merging method

2015-02-04 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B (sending this off-list) Rather late and off-topic, but if you're using firefox there are greasemonkey scripts that can solve the top-posting issue for you (by bottom-posting by default) when using gmail. Cheers, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top

Re: [aur-general] AUR UTF-8 support?

2015-01-22 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-01-21 18:08, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 at 18:05:17, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:41:53 -0300 > > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I posted a message ending with the character "

[aur-general] AUR UTF-8 support?

2015-01-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Hi, I posted a message ending with the character "😄" on the AUR today, but that character got stripped. Does AUR not have UTF-8 support? Have I bumped into a new issue? Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my r

Re: [aur-general] AUR 4 => Migrating 1 git to git-per-package

2015-01-18 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
hing most of the time.) I would have gone with `git branch --orphan` and `git cherry-pick`, but this looks like an interesting alternative I had not thought of. Thanks for the script! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? pgppKeXNkH7yw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] AUR 4.0 and existing git repositories

2015-01-17 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-01-17 17:15, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 at 17:03:45, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been reading about the upcoming AUR 4.0 with git repositories for each > > package (which is very much welcome for a variety of rea

[aur-general] AUR 4.0 and existing git repositories

2015-01-17 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
nario been given any thought? Cheers and thanks for the hard work! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? pgpiWHYj4xy_Y.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-06 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ontrast and maybe > *bold* font. > > cheers! > mar77i I'd love to see markdown support on the AUR. It's simple enough, but makes a huge difference. Especially when you bundle plenty of links, lists, etc. Also, since markdown is so simple, it can be emailed as-is in plain tex

Re: [aur-general] Categories

2014-09-04 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2014-09-05 02:59, carstene1ns wrote: > Am 05.09.2014 um 00:51 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera: > > [...]if they can be parsed by pacman somehow, they would add some use. > > Otherwise, I'm ok > > with deleting them. > pacman has no AUR support, this was a decision.

Re: [aur-general] Categories

2014-09-04 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
I think we should remove category because only a > > few packages actually use correct category. It is almost useless. > > +1 > > — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet Cheers, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start

[aur-general] Categories

2014-09-03 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
;t be the only person who's wanted to do something like "pacman -Q --category=games" to look for installed games. (the example syntax is horrible, but it's just to make it understandable). Any opinions? Downsides? Comments? Cheers! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from

[aur-general] Meta packages in AUR?

2014-09-03 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
l my machines have base-devel entirely installed. Is it ok to upload/share these? The AUR guidelines don't explicitly forbid these [1], but I want to make sure there's not precedent or issues with these. Cheers, [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#What_kind_of_packages_

Re: [aur-general] AUR notification emails don't mention which package they refer to

2014-08-18 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2014-08-18 14:15, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > On Monday 18 August 2014 07:04:40 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > I just got the following email from AUR: > > > > - Forwarded message from not...@aur.archlinux.org - > > > > > Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014

[aur-general] AUR notification emails don't mention which package they refer to

2014-08-18 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
l is refering to. It does not mention the related package, so I've no way of knowing what package has been orphaned. Maybe TUs have access to requests, but normal users don't. So basically, I now know that some package has been orphaned, but not which one. Can a fix for this be conside

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2014-06-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2014-06-09 18:26, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > On Monday 09 June 2014 01:57:39 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > Please merge > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mba6x_bl-dkms-git/ > > > > into > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mba6x_bl-dkms/ > > &

[aur-general] Merge request

2014-06-08 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
outdated and had a few issues, but I now maintain both, so it makes no sense to keep two. Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: No, it doesn't make sense. Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply? pgpb1qGqy_UhK.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Deletion request

2014-05-28 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/planetary-annihilation-curl/ It used to build a required version of libcurl for planetary-annihilation, but the latest upstream tarball includes libcurl.so.4, so this package is no longer needed. Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: No, it

[aur-general] Merge request

2014-05-07 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Please merge light-table into lighttable: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lighttable/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/light-table/ The latter only exists because the former was out of date (and it seems nobody had contacted the previous mainteiner). Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: No

Re: [aur-general] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux

2014-04-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
of rebuild. > Changing depends on packages to exact versions will make these incompatibilities rise quickly. Eg: package A should depend on packageB=x.y.z-n That would avoid mixing up different versions. This would avoid a library being updated in a system until all packages that depend on i

Re: [aur-general] Please remove these packages from AUR

2014-04-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ing the git > packages. > > The original zfs packages in AUR are no longer required and would only > confuse users. > > Thanks, > Jesus A. > I belive that merging into zfs-git and zfs-utils-git would be the proper action in this case, so as to keep comments/votes and notify

[aur-general] Deletion request

2014-04-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
this package). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: No, it doesn't make sense. Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply? pgpRXxq9y6dN_.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2013-12-20 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2013-12-12 14:21, John D Jones III wrote: > On 12/12/13 09:12, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Can we merge lightning-bin into thunderbird-lightning-bin? > > > >Thanks! > > > I would prefer to see it merged the other way around... > >

[aur-general] Deletion request

2013-12-18 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Can we delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quakelive/ ? Aside from being orphaned, this is an online-only game, which is no longer supported by upstream servers. Linux support has been dropped permanently (even for paying users), making the package completely useless. -- Hugo Osvaldo

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-12 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
iple implementation > and post a RFC. > > Regards, > Xyne I'm very much in favour of this (I'd even though of something slightly similar at some point). We need a PKGBUILD2.0 format that can overcome of our current limitations. The downside is flexibility. What if the sources are complete different for each architecture. At the moment, we can have an "if" in place. The same applies for depends that vary according to architecture. Would we just have a bunch of differently named-fields? Before you post an RFC, a complete example of a really complex package (with wierd sources, depends and stuff) would be great! :D Anyway, if this becomes a reality, feel free to CC me; I'd be willing to help the development of tools for this format! :D -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpxAn4sLSDKZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Merge request

2013-12-12 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Hi, Can we merge lightning-bin into thunderbird-lightning-bin? Thanks! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpS3QycYr6wA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-pyside -> python-pyside

2013-09-19 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2013-09-16 05:43, Xyne wrote: > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > > >As maintainer of python2-pyside shouldn't I have gotten a notification > >about this? At least an automated one from the AUR? > > > >Also, since the PKGBUILD states "replaces=(python2-py

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-pyside -> python-pyside

2013-09-15 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ces=(python2-pyside...", shouldn't searching the AUR for python2-pyside yield python-pyside as one of the results? Finally, why does this merge make sense? It merges two *different* libraries into one; I maintained python2-pyside, but have no interest in installing the python3 version, so w

[aur-general] Merge request

2013-08-29 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Please merge python-shiboken into shiboken. The shiboken package is older and shiboken is an application, not a library, so it as the proper naming scheme. Both packages provide the same software, and there are no particular differences in build flags. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Deletion request

2013-08-20 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imaplib2. I must have accidentally uploaded it, and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaplib2/ is the real thing. No votes or comments, so no point in merging. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpMw90a2yoMD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] discussion about activity

2013-08-11 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
.archlinux.org/tu-bylaws.git/ > > Note that I have made some stylistic changes that preserve the original > meaning. I can separate these from the proposal if necessary. > > Regards, > Xyne > > > > * Incidentally, I have always been uncomfortable with the way inactivity > announcements are expected to be made on a public mailing list. Inactivity > is > almost always due to being away from home for a period of a week or more. > Announcing that in public is an open invitation to burglars and other > griefers who know who the announcer is and where he/she lives. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpo7C3lT4tbi.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Disown request

2013-07-29 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pidgin-gpg No reply from author, package out-of-date for months. Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpOlErWnzObj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
on-theme"? AUR has search, so it's pretty much the same, and the same applies to pacman. It's too much work to change every existing package right now (since most already use *-icon-theme) and *-icon-theme sounds more natural ie: "Just install the gnome icon theme pac

[aur-general] Deletion request

2013-06-25 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
, deprecated (and unbuildable): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunbrand/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunbird-i18n/ -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpCC_Q969lCM.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Deletion Request

2013-04-17 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Package opensmtpd-portable-release[1] is basically the same as opensmtpd, out of date, orphaned, 0 votes. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensmtpd-portable-release/ -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpW2TxM3IVFv.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Merge Request

2013-04-04 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
I've renamed package "opensmtpd-portable" to "opensmtpd-snapshot". The rename is due to upstream having made a stable release (and this package will track the snapshots as it always has). Could someone please merge the former into the latter? Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Ba

[aur-general] Deletion request

2013-03-11 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Please delete python-django[1]. This package is already available in [testing] Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Merge packages

2013-01-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
differencebetween.net/technology/difference-between-ttf-and-otf/ > > Thank you. > Software which supports TTF and OTF tend to prefer OTF by default, so having both won't be an issue. If you want a TTF-only package or OTF-only package, you're free to create it, but I belive the merged package make way more sense. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Package deletion

2012-10-04 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

2012-07-11 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2012-07-10 23:35, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> opensmtpd [1] seems to be abandoned. I marked it out of date, and >> left the

[aur-general] Orphan request

2012-07-10 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
pt it and maintain it myself. Thanks, [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50709 - -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP/NAjAAoJEIc88gcb++1EMswIAIpTwF0

[aur-general] Merge request

2012-06-08 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
) - -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP0swpAAoJEIc88gcb++1E+FsH/0gCp7UDISo/55IOjYqcOK5B /5/xy6BDSeqypDbpm7o28E9kyIpIzeqpo3uq72yBiYwMzLn9dvyfC57hHEHPvnU+ Z+y

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: Linux Manga Downloader

2012-06-06 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> "${pkgdir}/usr/bin"/* 9. sed 's|usr/local|usr|' -i > "${pkgdir}/usr/share/applications/LDM.desktop" > --- > Instead of mkdir, cp and chmod, use "install -D -m 755 path/to/source path/to/destination" "-D&

Re: [aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

2012-06-03 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
the ARCH array. The point is to know beforehand if the package works - currently I can know if a package works or not in my arch (amd64) by looking at the PKGBUILD. That's the whole point of that array. - -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/L

Re: [aur-general] Idea for AUR improvement

2012-06-02 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2012-06-02 11:55, Xyne wrote: > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > >> I think a list of "packages I've contributed to" (similar to "my >> packages", but also includes packages you've orphaned) in AUR would >> solve this, and be helpful for ot

Re: [aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

2012-06-01 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2012-06-01 03:17, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 01/06/12 02:31, Loui Chang wrote: >> On Thu 31 May 2012 09:56 -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: >>> On 2012-05-31 08:10, Phillip Smith wrote: >>>> On 31 May 2012 17:38, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >>>>>

Re: [aur-general] Idea for AUR improvement

2012-06-01 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
r some reason, and comes back, IF he's intereseted in re-adopted his orphaned packages, he'll just see that list, and adopt them. Currently, it's pretty hard to know what packages you've contributed to in the past, and it is something nice to have. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Separating PKGBUILDs for architectures - Was: AUR and unsuported architectures

2012-06-01 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
t; with the supported ones. > > Ultimately I still think that it's unfortunate that all of the metadata is > locked up in Bash. It difficilitates the creation of many practical > metapackaging tools. > > If anyone wants to play around with this idea, reply in a new thread. I've > left > this in the old one because I don't expect any real discussion, but it might > be > interesting. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

2012-05-31 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ms to have sufficient packages, possibly making it worth being supported, but the lack of infrastructure won't make that so possible. In any case, it's good to know the official stance so I know what to do in these sort of cases. Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Merge request

2012-05-30 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
40917 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40916 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59645 Thanks! - -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozde

[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures

2012-05-30 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
on this, especially since I'm about to install archlinuxppc on one of my laptops. :) Cheers, thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests

2012-05-26 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Ooops, womething when wrong as I copy pasted the last two: On 2012-05-26 13:52, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > VERY Out of date, orphan: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32599 > > Out of date over a year, orphan, no votes > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11

[aur-general] Deletion requests

2012-05-26 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
-apache 3.0.1-2 Out of date over a year, orphan, no votes https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44949 ruby-enterprise-daemon-controller 0.2.5-0 Out of date over a year, orphan, no votes Out of date over a year, orphan, no votes -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2012-05-26 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2012-05-26 05:13, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > wrote: >> I've renamed "pyside" to "python2-pyside", in accordance to Arch's >> package naming guidelines. >> >> Could someone merge

[aur-general] Merge request

2012-05-26 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
I've renamed "pyside" to "python2-pyside", in accordance to Arch's package naming guidelines. Could someone merge the former into the latter? Thanks -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] iceweasel md5sum problem

2012-05-10 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
t; Rafael >> > > Jaja yeah I though the same, but sometimes it gaves that md5sum and another > times it gaves a different checksum, finished on 6o6 I think (i don't > remember the exactly output) Just in case, a diferent arch will result in a different package and therefore a different checksum. Is there any reason you've made this package amd64 only? -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Deletion request

2012-05-06 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42593 u-boot 2010.09-1 Very out of date, orphaned. Also, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37798 [uboot-mkimage] seems to be a newer package of the same program. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Merge requests for compiz-*git to compiz-*-bzr

2012-04-15 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
ckages. > > take care > > jordan Yes, they are the 0.9x branch, and, as you said, the website is seriously outdated. GIT is no longer used, and launchpad contains the latest relevant information, not compiz.org (though I agree this is not at all obvious to anyone not following compiz). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Merge requests for compiz-*git to compiz-*-bzr

2012-04-13 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
s.php?ID=58435 compizconfig-backend-gsettings-git 20110827-2 -> compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr 158-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51898 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58437 -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Deletion requests: firefox*

2012-04-11 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
=33204 swiftweasel-intel32-pgo-it-lns 3.5.6-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27184 swiftweasel-intel64 3.5.6-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20878 swiftweasel-intel64-pgo 3.5.6-1 -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Compiz* package cleanup (re-requesting)

2012-04-11 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2012-04-10 00:41, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > The following packages should be deleted (or merged in some cases). > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35912 > Dependency no longer exists, orphan, and already almost certain this no > longer works. (this has been unsup

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests

2012-04-10 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Here go package names; for posterity's sake: On 2012-04-09 23:57, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > The following are all orphan. They each have additional reason(s) that > make them candidate for deletion. > > django-testing 1.3beta1-1 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?

Re: [aur-general] Compiz* package cleanup

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2012-04-10 03:23, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > wrote: >> The following packages should be deleted (or merged in some cases). > > It's great that you're clearing thing up, good job =). You really > should include pac

[aur-general] Delete antargis

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10863 Out of date for over six months, orphan, url is broken, last comment says it didn't even build. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] fixing dupekill

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
. Also, you can use "install -D..." to create the directory and skip the "mkdir" line. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Compiz* package cleanup

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
he package, and upstream). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request (?): libxfce4menu-devel, xfce4-notifyd-devel 0.2.1-1

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
rsion"? (or possible xfce4-power-manager). Also, "hal" is missing from the depends in any case. (I'd fix it, but I think it's worth deletion). -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

[aur-general] Deletion requests

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
d, out of date for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28344 Fails to build, out of date for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29213 should be merged into "python-httplib2" (in [extra]). Also, and out of date. Cheers! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Request for Package Removal

2012-04-09 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
BUILD download a ZIP from appropiate tag (there's a "zip" button next to the repo url: https://github.com/sporkbox/dupekill Cheers! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera