Re: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne

2020-12-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 00:56 +0100, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:55:21AM +0100, Morten Linderud wrote: > > > Congratulations Remi! Welcome to the Trusted User team :) > Bravo and welcome 🎉️ Cheers, Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer signature.asc Descriptio

Re: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne

2020-11-14 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 08:52 +0100, Remi Gacogne via aur-general wrote: > ... > Hello, Remi would be a great addition to the team. I can testify he loves beers and he's kind. Regards, SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] TU application; freswa

2020-05-28 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 08:42 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > Em maio 21, 2020 8:29 Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general escreveu: > > The discussion period is over. Let's vote! > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=121 > > > > > > The voting period is over and we have a res

Re: [aur-general] Being an asshole to package maintainers is a bannable offense, and that's okay (Was: EQ And Community Kindness)

2020-01-16 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 17:42 -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > > Eli, I suggest you re-phrase that message. Michael, thanks for bringing > this up. > I cut for readability but I totally agree with what Santiago says. Regards, SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer signature.asc Desc

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

2019-12-26 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 01:51 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 01:43, Anatol Pomozov < > Because Docker+EE works flawlessly and reliably while upstream breaks the > packages we have every other release. Upstream _needs_ their Docker EE > image to work as there

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

2018-12-25 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Tue, 2018-12-25 at 10:05 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:13 AM Chih-Hsuan Yen via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > I don't like this. I does not appear as though Metal A-wing put in > anyresearch into this (going to the archives, checking proper

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

2018-11-28 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 20:10 +0100, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Plenty TUs appear to agree with most things said here, both on the ml and in > our top-secret irc channel - however, some have raised issues with part of > the suggestions which makes me wonder how we should approach this to

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

2018-11-11 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer via aur-general
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:29 -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > ## Issues > * Existing Trusted Users are not followed closely in their actions, and the > quality of some packages for instance is more than questionable. Do you have several example to show? > * New applications are

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

2017-12-25 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 22:34 +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > On 2017-12-18 16:07, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > > On 2017-12-13 14:52, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > > > On 2017-12-13 13:57, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > > > > Hello, all

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Thore Bödecker

2017-05-23 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 14:06 +0200, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > On 15.05.2017 14:04, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > > The discussion period is now over. You can vote here: > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=92 > > Yes: 30 > No: 3 > Abstain: 9 > Voted: 91.30% > > Result: A

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application: Giancarlo Razzolini

2016-11-10 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 10:07 +0100, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > On 27/10, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On 10/20/16 at 11:23am, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > >   My name is Giancarlo Razzolini (grazzolini) and I would like to > > >   become a TU. B

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-23 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On mer., 2016-03-23 at 22:59 +0100, G. Schlisio wrote: > > > > Well, the 5 day period has ended to interview the applicant, so now the 7 > > day period to vote is opened. > > > > Good luck! > > > > Cheers > out of curiosity: is the voting over yet? > Yes and the motion was denied. Cheers, --

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Pierre Neidhardt

2015-10-13 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 10:59 +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Great, I'm very happy to read this! > Thank you very much and see you around! :) > > On 15-10-12 17:58:43, Alexander F Rødseth wrote: > > The vote is over and the results are: > > > > Yes: 24 > > No: 4 > > Abstain: 4 > > > > Congratula

Re: [aur-general] aurweb 4.0.0 released

2015-08-08 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 13:42 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hello, > > We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.0.0 has been released. The > official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. That's a big improvement. Bravo for this good work. Cheers, -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://s

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application: Levente Polyak

2015-04-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On sam., 2015-04-04 at 16:15 +0800, Felix Yan wrote: > On 03/25/2015 04:31 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > > The discussion period has ended. Time to vote TUs! > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=81 > > Thanks to everyone who have voted! > > With 29 yes and only 1 no votes, I am glad to welcome Leve

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

2015-01-14 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 14/01/2015 11:49, Laurent Carlier wrote: > Le mercredi 14 janvier 2015, 01:39:25 Jerome Leclanche a Ă©crit : >> Thanks! >> J. Leclanche >> > > Felicitations et bienvenue! > Tout pareil! -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer Archlinux Developer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Moving opensc from community to AUR

2014-11-27 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 26/11/2014 15:09, Timothy M. Redaelli wrote: > On 08/06/2014 02:09 AM, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm not using opensc anymore, is there a Dev/Tu interested by taking >> care of it? >> >> I will move it to AUR if nobody is interes

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2014-11-08 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 07/11/2014 10:34, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 31.10.2014 08:44, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Antonio Rojas wrote: >>> Hello Arch Linux community, >>> >>> This is my application to become an Arch trusted user. My name is Antonio >>> Rojas, I'm a mathematician and pro

Re: [aur-general] add

2014-10-11 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 12/10/2014 04:09, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote: > hi list > Is one can add my Program to aur?? > this my Program > http://sourceforge.net/projects/rosecrypt/ > Sure, you! That's an user repository. Cheers, -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer Archlinux Developer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG

Re: [aur-general] Supported Architectures

2014-10-06 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 06/10/2014 15:03, Jameson wrote: > I know that officially Arch only supports i686 and x86_64, but what > about AUR? I occasionally have people request that I add ARM > architectures to my PKGBUILDs in the AUR. Is it more appropriate for > me to tell them that it is an unsupported architecture, o

Re: [aur-general] ArchLinux TU Application: Fabio Castelli (Muflone)

2014-08-12 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 12/08/2014 16:59, Balló György wrote: > The vote is over and the results are: > > Yes: 23 > No: 2 > Abstain: 5 > > Fabio, you became a TU! Welcome to the team! Benvenuto a bordo. Cordiali saluti, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signa

Re: [aur-general] no LLDP tools in [extra] or [community] :-/

2014-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 04/08/2014 17:39, Ido Rosen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: >> On 23/07/2014 23:35, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: >>> On 23/07/2014 15:59, Ido Rosen wrote: > That's fair, thank you for packaging lldpd! I noticed RedHat no >

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation.

2014-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 04/08/2014 18:41, Peter Lewis wrote: > ... > Thanks for you early support. Good road buddy! -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Moving opensc from community to AUR

2014-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
Hello, I'm not using opensc anymore, is there a Dev/Tu interested by taking care of it? I will move it to AUR if nobody is interested. Cheers, -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] no LLDP tools in [extra] or [community] :-/

2014-08-04 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 23/07/2014 23:35, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: > On 23/07/2014 15:59, Ido Rosen wrote: >> There's a PKGBUILD for ladvd and lldpd in AUR currently, these are >> important networking tools in data center environments. Can someone >> please promote at least one of them

Re: [aur-general] no LLDP tools in [extra] or [community] :-/

2014-07-23 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 23/07/2014 15:59, Ido Rosen wrote: > There's a PKGBUILD for ladvd and lldpd in AUR currently, these are > important networking tools in data center environments. Can someone > please promote at least one of them to [community] or ideally [extra]? > They're not high on votes, but I think this s

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] linux-selinux

2014-03-18 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 19/03/2014 01:11, Timothée Ravier wrote: > Please remove linux-selinux: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/ > > Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel. > > Thanks > Done. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 G

Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?

2014-03-08 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 08/03/2014 04:36, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > I notice that the AUR ceph package installs non-systemd initscripts, > would moving this package to community upset some of the anti-systemd > users, or would the non-systemd initscripts be kept as a part of the > package or split off to an independent A

Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?

2014-03-07 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 07/03/2014 17:26, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small > test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still > don't trust it). > I support adding Ceph. There are professional appliances based on Ceph. We have a cluster

Re: [aur-general] Voting results

2014-02-16 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 16/02/2014 00:54, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 at 18:14:21, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 at 20:26:22, Anatol Pomozov wrote: >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is >>> sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer Dav

Re: [aur-general] Removal request mkzipbomb

2014-02-08 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 09/02/2014 00:06, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: > Please remove the package mkzipbomb [1]. The package is empty and the > former maintainer has asked it to be removed in the comments of the package. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mkzipbomb/ > > Thanks > Done. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seb

Re: [aur-general] Need to delete AUR package

2014-02-06 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 06/02/2014 23:02, Argyrios Deligiannidis wrote: > I need https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nitr … -kde- > dark/[1] to be deleted from AUR, because I did not notice > that the company that created the Nitrux icon theme has a > proprietary black theme. > Thank you. > > > [1] https://

Re: [aur-general] TU application sponsored by David Reisner

2014-02-04 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 05/02/2014 00:34, Xyne wrote: > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> Technically, that is correct. However, I am sure there are many other >> TUs volunteering to be the sponsor after having read the application and >> the discussion (me, for example). So I don't think it is a problem. If >> it makes fee

Re: [aur-general] TU application sponsored by David Reisner

2014-02-04 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 04/02/2014 13:24, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > The only thing that comes to my mind is if the folder where we 'cd' > before doing 'patch' is a symlink. In this case '..' will differ from > $srcdir. But unpacked source directory can't be a symlink, is it? I didn't read anything letting assume that a

Re: [aur-general] Request merge: l-smash into l-smash-git

2014-02-03 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 03/02/2014 22:33, SpinFlo wrote: > Hi > > please merge > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l-smash/ > > into > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l-smash-git/ > > l-smash use sources from git (no "tar.gz") Done. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D7

[aur-general] Fwd: Community package [virtualbox-guest-utils] marked out-of-date

2014-01-16 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
Best flag out-of-date ever? -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A --- Begin Message --- jesse.palmqu...@gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * virtualbox 4.3.6-3 [community] (i686): https://www.archlinux.org/packages/communit

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-12 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 12/01/2014 14:35, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should promote the use of .AURINFO files. Currently, only a > very small fraction of packages use it. A basic description of its > format can be found in the commit message of AUR commit 5a11373 [1]. > Regardless of whether we keep t

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages

2014-01-02 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote: > > Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-findutils/ > https://aur.archlinu

Re: [aur-general] Request delete libdvdnav-git and merge libdvdread-git -> libdvdread-videolan-git

2013-12-29 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 29/12/2013 20:26, SpinFlo wrote: > Hi > > please delete: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdnav-git/ (0 votes) > > superseed by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdnav-videolan-git/ > > > and please merge: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdread-git/ (2 votes) > >

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Sponsored by Balló György

2013-12-25 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 23/12/2013 22:41, Martin Wimpress wrote: > Hi, > > That's great news :-) > > I've got a lot on until December 29th but after that I will be able to > complete the initial TU tasks. > > Looking forward to working with you all soon. > > "Balló György" wrote: >> The vote is over and the r

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for f2fs packages

2013-11-30 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 30/11/2013 23:06, Curtis Shimamoto wrote: > There are still a couple f2fs packages in the AUR. Since f2fs is now > included in the mainline kernel, I don't think that these are necessary > anymore. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-f2fs/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-f

Re: [aur-general] docker v. docker

2013-11-26 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 26/11/2013 16:00, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2, > kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time. > > docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used > and current container solution. As of 0.7

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-11-16 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 16/11/2013 19:17, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git-simply/ > There already is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git/ , as > mentioned in io-git-simply's description. > This package doesn't build because the PKGBUILD doesn't list > dependencies and makedepe

Re: [aur-general] outdated package: xflr5-svn

2013-11-12 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 12/11/2013 17:40, Simon Klemenc wrote: > hello, > > i want to inform you about the outdated package xflr5-svn > (xfoil/panelmethod GUI) > > The package maintainer does not response on my suggestion of a new PKGBUILD > since 2 months. > My PKGBUILD might not be perfect, but it works. > > best

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: elephantsay

2013-11-12 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 13/11/2013 02:49, Ruben Maher wrote: > Hi list, > > Please consider my package elephantsay [1] for deletion. It is a silly > thing, not updated in more than a year, and already implemented in > /usr/bin/repo-elephant! > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elephantsay/ > > Kind regards,

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat

2013-10-24 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On 24/10/2013 21:45, Simon Hollingshead wrote: > There's an issue that needs fixing in > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat/ > > but the maintainer has a lavabit email address, so I can't contact them. > Their lack of AUR activity and fact they have other fla

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: gogglesmm-hg

2013-10-02 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Sander Jansen wrote: > Please remove gogglesmm-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gogglesmm-hg/). > It has been replaced by gogglesmm-git. > Done. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: lsiutil

2013-10-02 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Justin Dray wrote: > I've tried emailing the current maintainer of lsiutil as it is out-of-date > and have not had any response. I'd like to update it/maintain it. > Out of date since 2month. Last updated in 2011. All package of this user are out-of-date. Orphaned.

Re: [aur-general] btrfs-progs packages

2013-09-24 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:54 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > On 17 September 2013 16:06, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > >> On 17 September 2013 15:39, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, WorMzy Tykashi >>> wrote: > > Okay, it look

Re: [aur-general] btrfs-progs packages

2013-09-17 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > As it stands, the new testing/btrfs-progs is building the same tools as the > btrfs-progs-git PKGBUILD (albeit with !staticlibs), extra/btrfs-progs is > still quite behind. > > Once the testing package hits extra, btrfs-progs-git will be red

Re: [aur-general] btrfs-progs packages

2013-09-17 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:35 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > Hi, I've submitted two new btrfs packages to the AUR: > btrfs-progs-unstable-integration [0] and > btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git [1], and I'd like opinions on the > state of things: > > a) should btrfs-progs-git [2] should be merged w

Re: [aur-general] Source packages in the AUR

2013-09-12 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Is it OK to upload PKGBUILDs like > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ga/gawk-source/PKGBUILD ? This package doesn't do bad things like duplicate an official one or violate a copyright. It seems perfectly useless btw. Cheers, -- SĂ©bas

Re: [aur-general] TUs and their following of the Bylaws

2013-08-07 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Xyne wrote: > Angel Velásquez wrote: > >>Supa easy, open the TU panel at the AUR, check who voted and who didn't >>on the lasts SVP (the last three or more if you want) .. make some >>decision about it, yeah we made the quorum but still, what about these >>people th

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Honor TUs who become active/inactive during votes

2013-08-07 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:54:41AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >> On 6 August 2013 20:19, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:12:32PM +0200, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: >> >> On Tue,

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Honor TUs who become active/inactive during votes

2013-08-06 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:20AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >> On 6 August 2013 05:53, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > Any other opinions? Yes, we should drop completely the active statement. This will simplify computation and restore th

Re: [aur-general] TUs and their following of the Bylaws

2013-08-04 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:40:53PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote: >> Hi people, >> >> [...] >> >> Having that set, I am shocked about how the bylaws are being just used >> just for addition process, but for somehow are being ignored for stuff

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-07-27 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote: > Le samedi 27 juillet 2013 19:09:21 Dicebot a Ă©crit : >> On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> >> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting: >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69 >> > >> > Le voting period has ended. D

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-07-20 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot wrote: > It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does > explicit versioning do? Interesting question because it underlines some benefits of being a rolling release for their maintainers. 1) Productivity You don't need to modify your pa

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-07-19 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Dicebot wrote: > On 07/17/2013 11:52 PM, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: > Hey, Arch Wiki did not mention any questionnaire that needs to be answered! > ;) Yes and we don't speak of the rectal exam too. Not to discourage applicants. :) > Well, m

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-07-17 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Dicebot wrote: > Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User and > taking care of packages related to D programming language. Nice to see someone apply since the last fail. > > I have been using Arch Linux for last ~5 years but that does not re

Re: [aur-general] Request for removal

2013-06-10 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Jesse Jaara wrote: > [1]memcpymemset is bad duplicate of [2]libcofi_rpi-git > > [2]libcofi_rpi-git has been superseded by [3]arm-mem-git > > Remove: [1] & [2] Removed. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Request remove: l-smash-ffmpeg-git

2013-05-02 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:45 AM, SpinFlo wrote: > please remove > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l-smash-ffmpeg-git > > no longer need > > greetings Removed. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Request to remove trinity-fuzzer and trinity-fuzzer-git

2013-05-02 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Matt Henry wrote: > Hello, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-fuzzer/ and > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-fuzzer-git as I have renamed > them to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity and > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/t

[aur-general] Adoption request: exabgp

2013-04-20 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
Hello, Is there a TU interested by maintaining exabgp? It's updated too frequently. Cheers, -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-pycogent

2013-03-27 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Adam Caldwell wrote: > Please merge > python-pycogent > into > python2-pycogent > > I have adopted, updated, and renamed the package. > Done. Please next time provide links to both packages. Cheers, -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period

2013-03-24 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Xyne wrote: > Don deJuan wrote: > >>> There were objections! You consider them not sufficient to leads to this >>> result. >>> Everything that needed to be said has been said. After the voters have >>> made up their minds. > > Objections were raised and then count

Re: [aur-general] TU application from graysky - voting period

2013-03-23 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Xyne wrote: > Xyne wrote: > @TUs > The discussion period for this application was relatively short with very few > participating TUs. The only real objections were raised by Dave (who even > admitted that he may be "old and grumpy") and they were addressed without

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests

2013-03-06 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Florian Dejonckheere wrote: > The package subget-git [1] is outdated, does not build and depends on the > package alang-git [2], for which upstream is gone. The maintainer and > developer of both is webnull, and he did not respond to email (sent on > 17/02). Delete

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2013-02-13 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > It would seem that voting period is over. Alucryd is now a TU! > Bienvenu Ă  board. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2013-01-31 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > The vote is over and the results are: > > Yes: 16 > No: 7 > Abstain: 4 > > This means that Alexandre is now a TU! > > > Alexandre, > > Please follow the steps for new trusted users [1]. > > Welcome to the team. :D Welcome ! -- SĂ©basti

[aur-general] Drop start-stop-daemon to AUR

2013-01-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
Hello, Once backuppc initscripts will be removed, I plan to move start-stop-daemon to AUR. Wants to fill some adoption papers? Cheers, -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Merge request pylibg19 -> python2-pylibg19

2012-12-31 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nuno Araujo wrote: > Hi > > Could you please merge pylibg19 [1] into python2-pylibg19 [2]? > > Thank you and happy new year! > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylibg19/ > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pylibg19/ > > -- > Nuno Araujo > Done.

Re: [aur-general] Awesome 3.5

2012-12-23 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:26:49 +0100 > schrieb SĂ©bastien Luttringer : > >> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/awesome@naquadah.org/msg06536.html >> > > Removed dependencies: libev, gperf, luadoc > New dependenc

[aur-general] Awesome 3.5

2012-12-23 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
Hello, as a Chritsmas gift, Awesome 3.5 was released yesterdaty and will be available in few minutes in our community-testing repository. As you can expect, this update _will_ break your configuration. Please take time to read the announce[0] from Uli about this release before upgrading. If ever

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Daniel Micay (thestinger)

2012-12-21 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > > And I'm overdue on announcing this. The finally tally is: > > Yes: 20 > No: 1 > Abstain: 5 > > By the power bested in me I now pro... wait, no. Wrong speech... > > > > Crap. Can't find the template. Ah well, congrats and welcome aboard! > >

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2012-11-10 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:49 PM, François Boulogne wrote: > Hi TUs, > > Please, delete my package python2-liblarch_gtk [1]. > The reason is that python2-liblarch_gtk has been merged in > python2-liblarch by upstream. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-liblarch_gtk/ Done. Thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Request to orfan: nss-pam-ldapd

2012-10-31 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Thiago Kenji Okada wrote: > It is already two weeks since I contact the maintainer but he didn't > respond and this package is still old. So I am requesting this package to > be orfaned. I can adopt it since I made some changes to use it on my > laboratory (we are n

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Requests]

2012-10-31 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Diogo Bento wrote: > > > > Greetings, > I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: > slim-nock (as current slim from [extra] doesn't use consolekit): > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59448 Done. > udisks2-mount (as current udisks2 ve

Re: [aur-general] AsciiDoc version of the TU bylaws

2012-10-31 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi! > > I converted our TU bylaws to AsciiDoc and imported he converted document > into a Git repository that I temporarily hosted on [1]. Maybe we can > eventually move that to one of the Arch Linux servers. > > Benefits of the new version

Re: [aur-general] Request AUR package removal

2012-10-22 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martynas Januškauskas wrote: > Requesting the removal of AUR package fgx-cvs as it has been renamed (due to > incorrect naming). > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63646 > > Thank you. Done. Thanks. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.n

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation: Chris Brannon

2012-10-07 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Chris Brannon wrote: > Hello all, > I regret that it has come time for me to resign from Arch Linux, at > least for now. I have a lot of things going on in my life, with a new > job, a major cross-country move, and so forth. I haven't really been > attending to my

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

2012-10-07 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:47 PM, trya wrote: > Hi, > > emacs-tuareg-mode [1] is flagged since May 2012, I sent a mail to the > maintainer one week ago to no avail. Could you orphan this package, please? > The rule is 2 weeks : https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Other_requests

Re: [aur-general] privoxy systemd

2012-09-07 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:20 PM, skydrome wrote: > Systemd unit file has been added to community package, so this aur > package is no longer needed. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55378 > https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/privoxy&id=d5f9310

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel

2012-08-28 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote: > I use i686, x86_64 and arm architectures. I enjoy using my 10 year old laptop > as much as my 2 year old desktop, so I tend to avoid software bloat so I can > run the same setup on all my hardware (don't drop i686 support!). I enjoy > tr

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request xchat-svn

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:48 AM, wrote: > I contacted the current maintainer of xchat-svn[1] to become the next on > June 03, 2012, he responded back on June 14, saying "Be my guest. I no > longer use it." and I waited, but he didn't orphan the package, nor > respond to my subsequent "You have to

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: > craftbukkit-plugin-guns has been replaced by craftbukkit-plugin-gunsplus > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57782 Done. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [aur-general] Merge or Delete haskell-nanocurses

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:32 PM, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:22 PM, wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> haskell-nanocurses does not build, and has not built since GHC 6.8 or 6.10 >> as far as I'm aware. I found a git repo with a working

Re: [aur-general] Merge or Delete haskell-nanocurses

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:22 PM, wrote: > Hello all, > > haskell-nanocurses does not build, and has not built since GHC 6.8 or 6.10 as > far as I'm aware. I found a git repo with a working copy and made a new > package, haskell-nanocurses-git. Could you merge these or simply delete the > origi

Re: [aur-general] Merge package

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > 2012/8/5 Kevin Vesga <31337h4c...@gmail.com>: >> SĂ©bastien Luttringer writes: >> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@...> wrote: >>> > Please merge

Re: [aur-general] Delete and merge requests

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:43:15PM +0200, SĂ©bastien Luttringer wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Schala Zeal >> wrote: >> > In a hurry, making this quick: >> > >> > Please delete: >

Re: [aur-general] Merge package

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a > better name. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14716 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25331 Both packages are unable to

Re: [aur-general] package rename request

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Gour wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 15:41:52 +0200 > SĂ©bastien Luttringer > wrote: > >> Please push package python2-bento and provide link. We can only merge >> old package into new one. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID

Re: [aur-general] Delete and merge requests

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: > In a hurry, making this quick: > > Please delete: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58488 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58489 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60264 > > Please merge: > https://aur.archlinux.o

Re: [aur-general] package rename request

2012-08-05 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Gour wrote: > Hello, > > can you rename 'python-bento' package to python2-bento since it is > more appropriate considering it's has python2 deps? > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38611 > Please push package python2-bento and provide link. We can only

Re: [aur-general] remove libnl3

2012-07-31 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:54 AM, ohav chochmah wrote: > Hi, > > libnl3 [0] is the exact same package as libnl in core, just an > outdated (and orphan) version... > > Thanks. > > [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56523 Nuked. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [aur-general] delete whois-debian

2012-07-25 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, ohav chochmah wrote: > Hi, > > whois-debian [0] is the exact same package as whois in extra, just an > outdated (and orphan) version... > > Thanks. > > [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33715 Nuked. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [aur-general] Removing old named package: kdeplasma-playwolf-elements

2012-07-17 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Splash wrote: > Please could you remove kdeplasma-playwolf-elements now that I've already > upload kdeplasma-applets-playwolf-elements following the new KDE package > guidelines. Thanks Please provides links to old and new package. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringe

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request

2012-07-15 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Dan Vratil wrote: > Hi, > > could you please merge krunner-kopete-contacts [0] to kdeplasma-runners- > kopete-contacts [1] ? I updated the package according to KDE Package > Guidlines. > > Thanks, > Dan > Done. Thanks. -- SĂ©bastien "Seblu" Luttringer www.seblu.n

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2012-06-09 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Please merge eclipse-scala into eclipse-scala-ide. > > The former is an outdated, orphaned version of the same software. > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27200 (eclipse-

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Developer/TU key signing

2011-11-29 Thread SĂ©bastien Luttringer
sign your reply using your gpg key. > 2) name at least one package you already signed. > > [1] https://dev.archlinux.org/~ibiru/ionut_AT_master-key.archlinux.org > > 1) seblu (sigurd) 2) cpupower Regards, -- SĂ©bastien Luttringer www.seblu.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   >