[aur-general] lib32-portaudio forgotten... :'(

Hi all, I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order to install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be missing, busy, in outer space or whatever and doesn't reply requests in comments or emails. And I already have the PKGBUILD ready for it!

Re: [aur-general] lib32-portaudio forgotten... :'(

Thanks, Fixed! 2011/2/3 Evangelos Foutras > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order > to > > install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be > > missing,

[aur-general] License installation

Hi there. I read Licenses and PKGBUILDpages at Archwiki and I've been wondering: case a software's license is one the common ones (ex: GPL), if the PKGBUILD should do some kind of reference (symlink) fro

Re: [aur-general] License installation

ilink from common/LGPL folder to ${pkgname} ? Or do nothing - and leave as it is? 2011/2/7 Kaiting Chen > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:50 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > > I read Licenses <https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Licenses> and > > PKGBUILD<https://wiki.arch

Re: [aur-general] License installation

Got it! Thanks all! 2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply, Kaiting. I actually understand what license is for > > each packages. My question is if, in the PKGBUILD, I should set a > > folder/symlink

[aur-general] Disown request

Hi there. I tried to have the maintainer of *lib32-gtk-engines* and *lib32-libidl2* to fix the PKGBUILDs to comply Multilib, but got no answer by email for 10 days now. I got it ready to upload. Please disown these 2 packages? Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:22 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > > Hi there. > > > > I tried to have the maintainer of *lib32-gtk-engines* and *lib32-libidl2* > > to > > fix the PKGBUILDs to comply Multilib, but got no answer by email for 10

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > > 2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch > > > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:22 PM, rafael ff1 > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi there. > > > > > > > >

[aur-general] Please help create package lib32-gobject-introspection

Hi all, I'm trying to build gobject-introspection for lib32 version for my Arch64, but it is failing in the "configure" command saying that Python headers were not found. This 32 bit library package seems to be dependecy (not sure, though) for some lib32 packages (afaik "at-spi", "gconf", "polkit"

Re: [aur-general] Please help create package lib32-gobject-introspection

2011/2/9 Det > > On 2/8/11, rafael ff1 wrote: > > Hi all, > And hello to you too > > > I'm trying to build gobject-introspection for lib32 version for my Arch64, > > but it is failing in the "configure" command saying that Python headers were > &

Re: [aur-general] Please help create package lib32-gobject-introspection

2011/2/12 Rémy Oudompheng : > On 2011/2/11 rafael ff1 wrote: >> Here some links: >> * http://aur.pastebin.com/xCPCmxR4  lib32-gobject-introspection PKGBUILD >> * http://aur.pastebin.com/tYPWHz64   build attempt for >> lib32-gobject-introspection (same old error msg) &

[aur-general] Disown request

The packages below don't comply with Multilib and are built from Archlinux binaries, even after I provided the solution (in a src.tar.gz) to the maintainer. Also, I didn't get any reply. Can you please disown them so I can fix the PKGBUILDs? lib32-gdbm

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

Yes, I have. I sent "src.tar.gz" files containning the PKGBUILDs and patches about one week ago and got no response. I have no problem fixing it and giving it back later, if he/she wants. I just want to fix it ;) 2011/2/16 Evangelos Foutras > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:23 A

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

Fixed. Thanks. 2011/2/16 Evangelos Foutras > On 17/02/11 01:44, rafael ff1 wrote: > > Yes, I have. I sent "src.tar.gz" files containning the PKGBUILDs and > patches > > about one week ago and got no response. > > > > I have no problem fixing it and

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-acl - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10274 Reason: The package was adopted in Multilib, so no reason to have an AUR package.

[aur-general] Deletion request

*Package*: lib32-gobject-introspection *Reason*: I currently own it. It happens that I was able to build only from binary (failed to build from source). Therefore, I created another "-bin" package.

[aur-general] Deletion Request

The package lib32-esd[1] is out-of-date, built from binary and orphan, while the package lib32-esound[2] provides the same application, is update and built from source. Delete lib32-esd please? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14022 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41702

Re: [aur-general] AUR 1.8.1 - Can No Longer Upload Packages

2011/3/14 Ray Rashif > On 14 March 2011 11:44, Tony C wrote: > > Apologies for the noise. AUR does not reject my package now after first > > creating the directory name for the package I have. I do not ever > > remember needing to create a special directory before. So I simply did > > mkdir packa

Re: [aur-general] sanity check / review my first AUR package

2011/5/8 Taylor Venable : > Hi everybody, I just started using Arch a few weeks ago, and I've been > mightily impressed. I want to help out, so I started looking in the > AUR for things to do. I noticed that there doesn't seem to be a > package for the devel version of SWI-Prolog. The stable releas

[aur-general] Deletion request for pcsx2-bin and pcsx2-svn-bin

PCSX2 Dev Team provides pcsx2 in two ways: binary tarball and svn source code. I'd like to organize things up about this emulator in AUR: my plan is to have "pcsx2" [1] as binary package and "pcsx2-svn" [2] getting from source code. Considering that the maintainer of pcsx2-bin [3] does not update

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for pcsx2-bin and pcsx2-svn-bin

2011/5/15 cantabile : > > If your package simply installs a precompiled binary, it should have the > "-bin" suffix. > > -- > cantabile > > "Jayne is a girl's name." -- River > I thought this would apply to software that were distributed in source tarballs... But it is fine. So, can you disown pcsx

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for pcsx2-bin and pcsx2-svn-bin

2011/5/16 Lukáš Jirkovský : > > I removed [4] as I see you already take over the [1]. For some time now I'm the maintainer of pcsx2, pcsx2-svn-bin and pcsx2-svn. My intention is to have in AUR only a binary as source (pcsx2 or pcsx2-bin) and another with SVN as source. > However I'm not > sure wh

Re: [aur-general] rodent, first upload

2011/5/16 Iñigo Álvarez : > I did a new PKGBUILD of the rodent file manager. I really think, after > discovering it in gentoo, it is a must be in arch. It consist in a very > lightweight, but complete file manager, aimed to expert users which stick to > the console. It permets using console command

Re: [aur-general] Libjpeg7 outdated

2011/5/24 pauline martin <321enil...@gmail.com>: > My apologies, I must have not even noticed that.  I am sorry.  Should the > package that I submitted be entered into the AUR or is it not needed?  I am > just trying to help keep the AUR updated as much as I can.  I once again > apologize for the o

[aur-general] Solution for lib32-allegro and lib32-allegro5 ?

Hi all! I currently maintain lib32-allegro [1] in its version 5.0. However, I wanted to change its version to 4 (anything less than version5) and add a lib32-allegro5 (anything >=5). The idea is to follow packages allegro [2] and allegro5 [3]. I found a variable "epoch"[4], which if not set in PKG

[aur-general] PCSX2 for Archlinux thread

Hi all! Just to let you know that there is a sticky thread in PCSX2 forum specifically for Archlinux users. The intention is to put issues, patches and other things in the same thread, which might make easier for arch users have their answer or to contribute. Y'all are welcome! http://forums.pcsx

[aur-general] Deletion Request

(I'm the maintainer of all them) Packages: - lib32-gobject-introspection-bin - lib32-flex - lib32-python2 Reason: - They just make no sense. Not needed and don't work. Thanks, Rafael

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

2011/6/4 Evangelos Foutras : > On 5 June 2011 00:18, rafael ff1 wrote: >> (I'm the maintainer of all them) >> >> Packages: >> - lib32-gobject-introspection-bin >> - lib32-flex >> - lib32-python2 > > All removed. Please include links to each pa

[aur-general] Deletion request: lib32-libjpeg-turbo

lib32-libjpeg-turbo [1] is already in multilib repository [2]. Maintainer copied in this email. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46972 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-libjpeg-turbo/ Thanks, Rafael

[aur-general] Disown request: lib32-libjpeg6

The maintainer of lib32-libjpeg6 [1] doesn't seem to be around for long time and won't fix the PKGBUILD to build from source code, even though I email him the source tarball in last January. Please disown, so I can fix it. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29929 Thanks, Rafael

[aur-general] Use multilib-devel in makedepends ?

Hi there, I always used "gcc-multilib" as makedepends for lib32 packages to avoid users that hadn't [multilib] repo turned on, but than I saw this "multilib-devel" group. It has gcc, glibc and libtool lib32 and multilib packages. Considering that "base-devel" group is assumed to be installed [1],

Re: [aur-general] [AUR] Orphan all old packages flagged as out-of-date

2011/6/8 Allan McRae : > > Seriously?  If someone can not find the time to update a package in 3 > months, there will be other people who can do a better job.  If we waited 6 > months for updates, we might as well be using Ubunutu. > I agree that waiting that long is too much. IMHO, it would be ni

[aur-general] Deletion Request: lib32-capt

This package is not lib32, is out-of-date for long time and capt is already provided in another package, amazingly called "capt". /irony http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45916 Thanks, Rafael

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: lib32-capt

2011/6/9 rafael ff1 : > This package is not lib32, is out-of-date for long time and capt is > already provided in another package, amazingly called "capt". /irony > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45916 > > Thanks, > > Rafael > Please delete this package...

[aur-general] Deletion request: lib32-libgnutls13

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19447 source URL is not available anymore, the package is not updated anymore since 2008 and hadn't much votes (only 2). No need to be at AUR, as far as i can tell. Thanks, Rafael

[aur-general] Deletion request: caffeine-dev

caffeine-dev [1] is orphan, it is a bzr without -bzr, have the same source as caffeine [2]. Doesn't seem to make sense keeping it in AUR. Please delete caffeine-dev. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30188 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29762

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011/6/16 cantabile : > On 06/16/2011 05:27 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: >> >> On 16 June 2011 05:19, Seven seven  wrote: >>> >>> Please delete libhupnp-svn >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44352and >>> libtorrent-rasterbar-dev >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33523. Thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Package Guidelines: Naming of Apache mods

2011/6/27 Jeremiah Dodds : > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Xyne wrote: > >>  prefer "apache-mod_name" >> > > Big +1, it's consistent and clear what the package is, and is likely to turn > up in common searches. > Would this be a case for adding apache modules in Arch Package Standards' Guideli

Re: [aur-general] Ask for checking a PKGBUILD

2011/7/13 Jelle van der Waa : > On 07/13/2011 06:54 PM, Marat Mukhametshin wrote: > Looks good. > > -- > Jelle van der Waa > > If this package is not specifically for x86 or x86_64 (no arch-specific ELF file inside), then you should use: arch=(any) Also, avoid commented and blank lines. PKGBUILD

[aur-general] PCSX2 Plugins folder - suggestion?

Hi all, I'm the maintainer of the package pcsx2-svn[1]. PCSX2 from now on will install files in a different folder than /opt/pcsx2 - I'm still going to adapt the PKGBUILD. Plugins, as I can see in Archlinux Packaging Standards [2], should go to /var/lib/pcsx2/PLUGINNAME.so... However, pcsx2 is a 3

Re: [aur-general] PCSX2 Plugins folder - suggestion?

2011/7/14 Justin Davis : > I think that you mean /usr/lib/pcsx2 instead of /var/lib/pcsx2. (...) Indeed, thanks for correcting me. > > Using two different folders depending on the host architecture is > overly complicated. The advantage of a "lib32" directory name is to > separate lib32 dynamic l

Re: [aur-general] PCSX2 Plugins folder - suggestion?

2011/7/15 Ray Rashif : > On 15 July 2011 16:35, Ray Rashif wrote: >> >> 32-bit libs-related stuff belong in /usr/lib32 on Arch64, nowhere else. Good point. I'll will use /usr/lib/pcsx2 for 32-bit and /usr/lib32/pcsx2 for 64-bit system, then. > > See file list of > http://www.archlinux.org/packag

[aur-general] Delete request

caffeine-gnome3 [1] is based in a branch that was already merged [2] to trunk, which is provided by package caffeine [3]. Therefore, no need for this package package anymore. Please delete caffeine-gnome3. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49831 [2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~caffein

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

2011/7/22 Evangelos Foutras > On 22 July 2011 10:18, Kwpolska wrote: > > Please, don't act like AN ASSHOLE. This is really annoying. Just say > > `removed'. > > I didn't know that posting a tongue-in-cheek reply every once in a > while translates to acting like an asshole. *shrugs* > > In my o

Re: [aur-general] Request for PKGBUILD check: tomboy-export-to-latex

2011/7/24 Evangelos Foutras > > > Also, the AUR might not accept the package without a build function. > I'm not sure if this has been fixed, but if you get a submission error > try adding: > > build() { > true > } > > above the package function. > Actually it accepts no build() function. ex:

[aur-general] Disown request

o I can fix the PKGBUILD with Unknown47's suggestion. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19615 Thanks, -- Rafael -- Forwarded message ---------- From: rafael ff1 Date: 2011/7/22 Subject: AUR package update: nautilus-dropbox To: archlinux@christianmorlok.de Hi there, T

Re: [aur-general] delete grub-gfx

2011/7/29 Heiko Baums > > I would keep grub-gfx and remove grub-legacy-gfx. The package in [core] > is also called grub and not grub-legacy. And the source package is also > called grub-0.97.tar.gz and not grub-legacy-0.97.tar.gz. So grub-gfx is > the better name. > > Heiko > +1

Re: [aur-general] delete grub-gfx

2011/7/29 KESHAV P.R. > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 00:58, Heiko Baums wrote: > > Am Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:47:03 +0530 > > schrieb "KESHAV P.R." : > > > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:36, KESHAV P.R. > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > Please delete grub-gfx > >> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php

[aur-general] Deletion Request

lib32-gmp-dev [1] is outdated for a thousand years and the maintainer seems to have forgotten this poor. Also, this resource is already provided by another package (lib32-gmp4). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28554 Please delete lib32-gmp-dev. Thanks, -- Rafael

[aur-general] Disown request

yg8dgnhupq4rxk2gzdrll2m1o7hsno_1oeuvkr...@mail.gmail.com> Subject: AUR packages fix From: rafael ff1 To: allspark@cyb0rg.0rg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d6446ab46704ab102615 Hi there, The packages you are maintaining, lib32-libsexy and lib32-libsexymm, are not built

Re: [aur-general] Disown request

2011/8/22 Evangelos Foutras > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:17 AM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > The packages lib32-libsexy [1] and lib32-libsexymm [2] have PKGBUILD set to > > build from binary and install libs in the invalid directory > > '/opt/lib32/usr/lib'. >

[aur-general] skype Segment fault and lib32-gconf

Hi all, I'm running into segment fault when starting skype (from [multilib]). After some tests, I notice that when i uninstall lib32-gconf, it seems to solve the problem. Can someone reproduce the error for me? Basically 1- Have installed skype and lib32-gconf 2- Run skype (error expected) 3- Uni

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011/9/1 Philipp Überbacher : > Excerpts from Gordon JC Pearce's message of 2011-09-01 20:15:28 +0200: >> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200 >> Philipp Überbacher wrote: >> >> > Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of >> > trouble (browser-plugin with whitelist and

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011/9/2 Gordon JC Pearce : > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:36:34 +0200 > Cédric Girard wrote: > >> > What happens if you *don't want to use https*? >> > >> >> I still have difficulties to understand why people would like to purposely >> avoid using https. > > I still have difficulties understanding why p

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011/9/3 Gordon JC Pearce : > On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 01:18:58 -0300 > rafael ff1 wrote: > >> >> 's' stands for Secure. Maybe security is a good reason. >> > > Oh, okay, so you put an "S" in and it waves the magic "secure" stick.  Very

[aur-general] Delete request

lib32-scim - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21523 The install file is missing, lib folder is not correct, source file is all "scim" binaries from Arch and, last, this package is wrong for more than 1 year. Thanks

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-portaudio-pulse [1] is a redundancy of lib32-portaudio, as stated by the maintainer. Please delete. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51584 Thanks in advance

Re: [aur-general] Mandatory comment along with OOD-flag

2011/9/13 nem : > > good day! > > recently i experienced some wild out-of-date flagging without any > comments or even backupped reasons for codelite [1] from different > users (even multiple times by the same) over the past two weeks. > someone has been kind enough to help me unflagging these. > >

Re: [aur-general] Mandatory comment along with OOD-flag

2011/9/20 Lukas Fleischer : > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:26:35AM +0200, nem wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:23:54 +0200 Lukas Fleischer >> wrote: >> > I kind of like the idea of adding a comment field. I wondered why some >> > package has been flagged out-of-date a couple of times and I think >>

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011/9/28 Thomas Dziedzic : > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Max Roder wrote: >> Hi, >> >> please remove python-libchamplain >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969 >> >> It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest >> version supporting python is outdated

[aur-general] Deletion request

intellij-idea-ultimate-edition-openjdk - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44402 This package contains "WARNING not recommended by JetBrains" in the pkgdesc, is flagged as out-of-date since Feb/2011 and the previous maintainer (linx56) confirmed that the package should be deleted, as you c

[aur-general] Delete user account

Username: PLEASE_DELETE Account Type: User Email Address: x...@y.com Real Name: PLEASE_DELETE IRC Nick: PLEASE_DELETE View this user's packages https://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=22469 Looks like this account wants to be deleted, right?

Re: [aur-general] gngeo compilation stops

2011/10/7 Daniel Hilst Selli : >> > Hey, its me again.. It compiles fine from my i686 installation .. So is > there any way to install it in my x86_64 system > > tks > This seems to be a 32 bit software. If multilib support was added to gngeo's PKGBUILD, maybe it could work in x86_64. Want to

Re: [aur-general] gngeo compilation stops

2011/10/7 Daniel Hilst Selli : > On 10/07/11 01:24, rafael ff1 wrote: >> >> 2011/10/7 Daniel Hilst Selli: >>> >>> Hey, its me again.. It compiles fine from my i686 installation .. So is >>> there any way to install it in my x86_64 system >>>

Re: [aur-general] gngeo compilation stops

2011/10/8 trya : > Here is a correct implementation : > http://pastie.org/private/3bikdhmwvjrvkvya9l7qa > Interesting. Neve seen this 'i386' in PKGUBILDs before. What is the difference between that and ' --libdir=/usr/lib32 CC='gcc -m32' ' ?

Re: [aur-general] gngeo compilation stops

2011/10/8 Daniel Hilst Selli : > On 10/08/11 13:13, rafael ff1 wrote: >> >> binutils-multilib >> gcc-multilib >> libtool-multilib > > Yes I have! > > binutils-multilib 2.21.1-2 > > gcc-multilib 4.6.1-4 > > libtool-multilib 2.4-5 > > Plea

Re: [aur-general] Aur error: Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.

2011/10/23 Dave Reisner : > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:00:29PM +0200, Ondřej Kučera wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to upload and updated PKGBUILD for my package >> spring-framework but I'm getting the error message "Invalid name: >> only lowercase letters are allowed.". I've never seen this befo

Re: [aur-general] Dynamically evaluating md5sum value in PKGBUILD

2011/10/27 Maciej Sitarz : > Hi all, > > I'm maintaining hunspell-pl AUR package > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44331). > The problem with the package is that the maintainer of the source provides > only the latest(daily) tarball snapshot. The md5sum of the tarball changes > daily and

[aur-general] Deletion Request

portaudio-pulse [1] is a redundancy of portaudio, as stated by the previous maintainer. Please delete. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51583 Thanks in advance

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: gtk3-with-xim-patch

2011/11/29 Jekyll Wu : > ... and AFAIK the patch is already commited in upstream Yes, it was commited, as can be verified in gnome's git. http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=d3274e8e0619bad02a7fa31874943707dc209fc8

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-allegro5 [1] is not needed anymore, as lib32-allegro was updated from 4.x to 5.x Please delete lib32-allegro5. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49527 Thanks

[aur-general] Disown request

accerciser is very out-of-date (pkg: 1.12.1, current: 3.3.1), with last update in Oct 2010. This, IMHO shows the lack of interest of the maintainer to fix the package. Please disown, so I can update it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Rename package?

2011/12/4 Dave Reisner : > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:19:09PM +, Jonathan Steel wrote: >> The name of this package doesn't seem quite right: >> >> "lib32-gstreamer0.10-base `pacman -Q|grep gstreamer0\.10\-" >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15586 > > That's what happens when you t

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-gail has a broken URL, is not updated for long time (since October 2008) and this software is implemented by Gnome's ATK since version 3.0. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17078 Please delete.

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-libcurl3 URL is broken, orphan and not update since September 2008 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19376

Re: [aur-general] Merry Christmas!

2011/12/24 WorMzy Tykashi : > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:37:22 +0800 > 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote: > >> All Arch Linuxer, >> >> Merry Christmas,have a nice holiday! > > Merry Christmas everyone! > > May you all consume copious amounts of food and alcohol (within > reason!) and enjoy yourselves. :D #!/

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008 Please delete

[aur-general] AUR site down?

Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down? $ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 61011ms

[aur-general] Deletion request

'mmc-lin' is a duplicate of 'mobilemediaconverter'. Even though the first one seems to be more up-to-date, it is broken for some time and the maintainer didn't even posted a comment nor a fix for the bug reported. [1] mmc-lin: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31686 [2] mobilemediaconverte

Re: [aur-general] [merge request] lib32-lib-compat

I am (or was) the maintainer of lib-compat. I will upload it again as soon as I get home- can't do from here. Rafael 2012/2/11, Florian Pritz : > On 11.02.2012 07:20, Anton Larionov wrote: >> Please, merge 'lib32-lib-compat' >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17208 >> into 'lib-compat'

Re: [aur-general] [merge request] lib32-lib-compat

2012/2/11 Florian Pritz : > On 11.02.2012 07:20, Anton Larionov wrote: >> Please, merge 'lib32-lib-compat' >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17208 >> into 'lib-compat' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17207 >> >> Reason: 'lib-compat' provides both i686 and x86_64 versions. >> >

[aur-general] Disownment request

portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him because his email's domain doesn't exist. Please disown this package so I can adopt and fix

[aur-general] Delete request

speex replaced SVN repo by GIT repo. Therefore, I uploaded speex-git to replace speex-svn. Please delete speex-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17012) Thanks, Rafael

[aur-general] Disown request

lib32-libnl [1] is out-of-date for some time now and fails to build. Sent email to the maintainer, but he didn't replay. By the way, all his packages are out-of-date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36007 Please disown lib32-libnl. Thanks

Re: [aur-general] lib32-openssl

2012/3/5 Taylor Lookabaugh : > I have orphaned the package[1] by the way, after updating and then > realizing there was a better alternative PKGBUILD available yesterday. > > > Taylor Lookabaugh > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 19:04, Taylor Lookabaugh < > jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> May

Re: [aur-general] community/python-markdown and community/python2-markdown

2012/3/7 Jelle van der Waa : > Since it's supports python2 and 3. > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Simon Legner wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> why do we have >>  python-markdown       2.1.1-2 >> as well as >>  python2-markdown      2.1.1-2 >> in community? >> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=mark

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver

2012/3/20 Martti Kühne : > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Maximilian Bräutigam wrote: >> Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong >> interpretation at aur.archlinux.org? >> >> This is the package we are talking about: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230 >

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver

2012/3/21 Martti Kühne : > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:34:52PM -0300, rafael ff1 wrote: >> This will display a weird source URL line in AUR interface, and that's >> what the author of the thread want's to avoid. Therefore, not that >> obvious. > > > in

Re: [aur-general] mysql-gui-tools unmaintained

2012/3/23 Heiko Baums : > > I guess mysql-gui-tools can be completely removed. As far as I know > this has been renamed to MySQL Workbench by upstream. Correct. "It is the successor to DBDesigner 4 from fabFORCE.net, and replaces the previous package of software, MySQL GUI Tools Bundle." (MySQL Wo

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini

2012/3/25 Daniel Wallace : > not sure if this is the same guy, but > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57961 > I just saw this pop up in the new packages > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:32:56AM +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: >> On 25 March 2012 01:32, Det wrote: >> > >> > The maintainer doesn'

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: virtualbox-sun

2012/3/26 Det : > I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment > section[1]. > > The reality here is that virtualbox-bin[2] has evolved into something _at > least_ as good as virtualbox-sun. While it's true that -sun is the original > one it's also the one with the inc

[aur-general] Deletion Request

lib32-libopenssl2 has bad naming, wrong lib folder (/opt/lib32/usr/lib), is orphan and is not a dependency for any package. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19380 Thanks

[aur-general] Deletion request

"scribus-ng" is release candidate package with an outdated (old) version and hasn't been updated for a year now. Plus this outdated package is the only one of this maintainer, so I guess he doesn't really want to maintain it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47919 (note: there is another m

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-file [1] is outdated for some time now (it's in version 5.0.4 while 'file' in [core] repo is in version 5.1.1 already), orphan and no one seems to need or care about this package. IMO, this package has no use. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43990 Please delete

[aur-general] Deletion Request

gizmo5 [1] provides a software that was shutdown in April 3, 2011, according to wikipedia [2]. Indeed it doesn't build, reporting http error 404. Please delete [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30417 [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gizmo5

[aur-general] Deletion request

I created glib2-unstable [1] to provide a newer version than glib2 2.30, which got updated to 2.32. Therefore, no need for glib2-unstable anymore. Please delete [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57190

[aur-general] Deletion request

lib32-libgdu [1] was uploaded and is maintained by me, when it was a dependency for other package, but right now it is not needed. And gnome-disk-utility (that would replace this package) doesn't have library to replace this package, so... please delete. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5

Re: [aur-general] removal request

I notice the same thing about AlienArena - that the project was dead - before this thread started, but I just notice that the latest version, 7.53, is dated December 2011 in http://icculus.org/alienarena/ . Then I found what seems to be the current site: http://red.planetarena.org/... So, I guess i

Re: [aur-general] removal request

oops, it seems I mixed things up badly right now, as AlienArena != ArenaLive. So, it might be dead indeed. Ignore my previous email. :D 2012/5/9 rafael ff1 : > I notice the same thing about AlienArena - that the project was dead - > before this thread started, but I just notice that the

[aur-general] Deletion request

'atrinik-client' [1] is orphaned and duplicated of 'atrinik-client-devel'. first submitted by same the user, it looks like he preferred to keep maintain the second one. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34857

  1   2   >