On Wednesday 09 February 2011 00:32:17 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 17:57 +0100, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
I would like to add that for some AUR-users, the packages is what they
would have to show for if they were to apply to become a TU.
As far as I know, the AUR history is not
2011/2/9 Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org
Two very good points. In that case we should be very clear that if a
package
is moved up the repo ranking or otherwise adopted, that all contributors'
names remain on there as a matter of policy (is it already?) I don't
believe
anyone has a
Not that I wouldn't mind the credit but it was Lukas Fleischer who
implemented the official repo checking code and not me. He is also
hosting the git repository for his branch of the AUR.
Oops, yeah, I saw this too at some point.
Your idea sort of sounds like retiring a package to me. That
I would like to add that for some AUR-users, the packages is what they
would have to show for if they were to apply to become a TU.
As far as I know, the AUR history is not recorded in any accessible way.
- Alexander
(trontonic on AUR / xyproto on #archlinux)
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 17:57 +0100, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
I would like to add that for some AUR-users, the packages is what they
would have to show for if they were to apply to become a TU.
As far as I know, the AUR history is not recorded in any accessible way.
- Alexander
(trontonic on
Hello official and inofficial maintainers and AUR devs.
Following the discussion in aur-general, I think some automation could
solve many issues at once here. Justin Davis' community-blacklist
patch is an approach in about the right direction although in
relation to the discussion concerning
On Saturday, February 05, 2011 14:49:49 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/2/5 Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com:
To Angel Velasquez: the nature of the relation is not like an ownership,
but more like an authorship. Is it that much to show your respect to the
author by a polite question? After all we
2011/2/7 Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net:
On Saturday, February 05, 2011 14:49:49 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/2/5 Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com:
To Angel Velasquez: the nature of the relation is not like an ownership,
but more like an authorship. Is it that much to show your respect to the
On Monday, February 07, 2011 12:22:41 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/2/7 Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net:
On Saturday, February 05, 2011 14:49:49 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/2/5 Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com:
To Angel Velasquez: the nature of the relation is not like an
ownership, but more like
2011/2/7 Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net:
On Monday, February 07, 2011 12:22:41 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/2/7 Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net:
On Saturday, February 05, 2011 14:49:49 Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/2/5 Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com:
To Angel Velasquez: the nature of the relation is
Ok, some of the messages from this thread started to became offtopic.
Here is my 2 cents and consider this being my last message.
We always had an unspoken rule about sending a thank you note but we
are all humans and forgot. Have my word that I spoke with the members
that forgot and this
Angel,
If AUR is a sucessgul project, it is not because of this kind of
language you use. Be friendly to your fellow Arch friends. I'm sure
that if the other TU would share this language, another project
similar to AUR would pop up elsewhere.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Bernardo Barros
bernardobarr...@gmail.com wrote:
Angel,
If AUR is a sucessgul project, it is not because of this kind of
language you use. Be friendly to your fellow Arch friends. I'm sure
that if the other TU would share this language, another project
similar
On 8 February 2011 03:23, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
Side note:
Although TUs are a great bunch, I don't think that's the main reason
why people use the AUR. :)
As much as I'd like for this thread to die, because the main issue was
settled very many replies ago (we all agree that
Not that I wouldn't mind the credit but it was Lukas Fleischer who
implemented the official repo checking code and not me. He is also
hosting the git repository for his branch of the AUR.
Your idea sort of sounds like retiring a package to me. That seems
like an interesting idea but I am not sure
Ángel Velásquez wrote:
We eventually show our respect to the author to notice him that we do
will move your package, but it's arrogant and too stupid to pretend
that a TU or Dev have to `ask you for permission` --- THIS IS
MADNESS, you aren't the owner of that PKGBUILD ! even if you wrote it
I maintain a few PKGBUILDs on AUR, including one that has a considerable
amount of votes [1]. It would be awesome to have any package that I maintain
moved to [community], it doesn't matter if the TU asked me or not, but this
is a personal opinion. Nevertheless, it is certainly polite to write a
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second class source of
packages compared to the official repos. Not surprising, of course, so
many packages have problems. This is also
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second class source of
packages compared to the official repos.
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
First of all remove that my before packages, that's a problem, some
maintainers thinks that they're owners of the PKGBUILD, and isn't like
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the maintainer
of a package for objections before moving a package into community. I also
want to continue to express my deep gratitude for the packagers who
contribute
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the
maintainer
of a package for objections before moving a package into community. I
On 02/05/2011 08:31 PM, Gergely Imreh wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
I moved a lot of packages from AUR in community/extra and every time i
did sent a thank you note. From that amount of messages i sent,
It would be technologically helpful if moving a package to Community (or
just deleting it from the AUR) did not consign its AUR comments to the
eternal bit bucket in the sky. At any rate, I often wish I could see
what was on the AUR page just before it was moved.
((if you want an example::
Hi, fellow Archers,
I feel a need to express my support to the opinion stated by Greg Imreh and
Thomas Hatch. There is an unique relation between the contributor/maintainer
and
the PKGBUILD. This relation calls for respect. So please TUs/devs act as people
and show it by letting first the
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the
I had the same problem a few weeks ago, when the polipo package I was
maintaining was moved to [Community] without any notice. I got aware of
this when yaourt told me my version of polipo was not the same as in the
repos… imagine my surprise when I didn't find my package on AUR anymore.
Not
On 6 February 2011 02:31, Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
This has come up a couple of times before, and we all know it is very
wrong to move a package from [unsupported]
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 21:00 +0100, Maxime Wack wrote:
I had the same problem a few weeks ago, when the polipo package I was
maintaining was moved to [Community] without any notice. I got aware of
this when yaourt told me my version of polipo was not the same as in the
repos… imagine my
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch
Le 5 février 2011 13:45:20, Thomas S Hatch a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second
Gergely Imreh wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second class source of
packages compared to the official repos. Not surprising, of course, so
many packages have
2011/2/6 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
First of all remove that my before packages, that's a problem, some
maintainers thinks that
2011/2/5 Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com:
To Angel Velasquez: the nature of the relation is not like an ownership, but
more like an authorship. Is it that much to show your respect to the author by
a polite question? After all we are people, not mindless machines nor animals.
Hi Nicky,
This is
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 21:00:32 +0100
Maxime Wack maximew...@free.fr wrote:
I had the same problem a few weeks ago, when the polipo package I
was maintaining was moved to [Community] without any notice. I got
aware of this when yaourt told me my version of polipo was not the
same as in the
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
2011/2/6 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
First of all remove that my before packages, that's
Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Hilton Medeiros a écrit :
Now, that is outrageous. Stealing your package is already a very nasty
thing to do, but not replying to your email is unforgivable!
From today onwards we shall call him: Jelle, the Soulless.
Wow, I didn't expect to be trolled on
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Maxime Wack maximew...@free.fr wrote:
Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Hilton Medeiros a écrit :
Now, that is outrageous. Stealing your package is already a very nasty
thing to do, but not replying to your email is unforgivable!
From today onwards we shall call
Hi Angel,
This is opensource world dude, can you see it?, so forget those
autorship and license of those PKGBUILD, plus, in many cases, many
of the packages went from one people to another. Btw I don't know why
people refers to packages when we are talking about aurballs
containing PKGBUILD,
On 6 February 2011 03:35, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
I moved a lot of packages from AUR in community/extra and every time i did
sent a thank you note. From that amount of messages i sent, only once i
got a reply. ONCE.
Should i be dissapointed? I guess yes. I am? No.
No need. The
On 6 February 2011 06:01, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that Hilton was trolling you Maxime, just poking a little fun
at Jelle.
He was so engrossed with moving a package (think about the excitement
he must have had) that he forgot about the formalities involved.
I have contributed a few PKGBUILDs to AUR. I do it because I enjoy it
-- all I ask is for is recognition. Yes, this is an open source
project and it is implicit that the work can and (hopefully) be
adopted and improved. But recognition of each person who contributed
should be maintained.
I am
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
I apologize for taking your package without emailing or notifiying you and
more I feel bad for not replying to your email. And now i am ashamed on the
mailing list,
I won't forget to mail the next time I adopt packages
I always send the maintainer a 'thank you' afterwards telling them that I've
moved their package to [community] and asking them if they have any specific
advise about the package. My personal opinion is that it is not necessary to
ask beforehand when moving a package simply because in my
I'll just add here that I used to use moving packages to [community] as
a TU recruitment ground. If the package I wanted to move to [community]
was obviously well maintained, I usually offered to sponsor the
maintainer to be a TU when I let them know I was going to move their
package. I
Thx guys for letting me know you would move some packages from AUR to community
thats really stimulating to contribute something
if you dont know what i'm talking about
- libssh2 ( i picked it up after bash dropped it in AUR)
- podofo (cant remember how i picked it up)
It would just be a
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.comwrote:
Thx guys for letting me know you would move some packages from AUR to
community
thats really stimulating to contribute something
if you dont know what i'm talking about
- libssh2 ( i picked it up after bash dropped
On Sunday, December 05, 2010 11:21:16 AM Kaiting Chen wrote:
I'm confused, are you the maintainer of these packages in the AUR? Usually
we will notify the maintainer of a package if it is moved from [unsupported]
to [community]. --Kaiting.
Seems that Sergej didn't this time...
--
Andrea
On Sunday 05 December 2010 17:21:16 Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.comwrote:
Thx guys for letting me know you would move some packages from AUR to
community
thats really stimulating to contribute something
if you dont know what
Hi everyone,
I'd like to move the following packages to community:
1) pspshrink [1]
2) ntlmaps [2]
In fact I am writting a wiki page about using ntlmaps through the Arch
Linux Installation for complementing the begginer guide :).
Opinions?
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17076
Ángel Velásquez escreveu:
emulators
===
stella
Adopted.
--
Tiago Pierezan Camargo
milopi @ irc.freenode.net
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Ángel Velásquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
devel
mono-zeroconf
mono-zeroconf is required by banshee. I was maintaining it on
community. I will adopt it again and, probably, move to [extra].
-- Hugo
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Hugo Doria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Ángel Velásquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
devel
mono-zeroconf
mono-zeroconf is required by banshee. I was maintaining it on
community. I will adopt it again and, probably, move to
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 02:44 +0200, Ángel Velásquez wrote:
Thanks to BaSh and Anders for helping me, and I'd like to know if dtw
and gummibaerchen are active at this moment, to know what will we do
with the remaining orphan packages.
I will have another look.
But mainly I was working on the
54 matches
Mail list logo
