El viernes, 11 de octubre de 2019 18:32:33 (CEST), Morten Linderud via
aur-general escribió:
Added a list of packages maintained solely by stativ. Please
adopt as people see fit :)
Adopted the KDE stuff. Thanks for your work!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:06:31PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> [SNIP]
>
> So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish,
> Lukas
>
Hi Lukas,
I don't think I ever had a chance to meet you, but I feel that parting
ways amicably is a comendable decision, and one
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:32 PM Morten Linderud via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> cdrtools
> cuetools
>
Adopted. Cheers.
Le 11/10/2019 à 18:32, Morten Linderud via aur-general a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:06:31PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general
> wrote:
>> The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't get
>> updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:06:31PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general wrote:
> The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't get
> updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess some
> of them can be safely dropped without anyone noticing (I'm looking
Hello everyone,
after much time I've finally came to admit to myself that I can no
longer fulfill my duties as a trusted user the way Arch Linux deserves.
While I still manage to update the packages I actively use, such as
rawtherapee, I can no longer keep up with other packages and updates
often
On 2019-10-08 14:35:22 (+0200), David Runge wrote:
> I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal
> of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an
> Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in
> regards to Ray's developer status.
In
Hey Giancarlo,
On 2019-10-08 10:41:44 (-0300), Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3
> days, not 7. The voting period is 5 days.
Correct, somehow I had the 'Removal of a TU' rules in mind when writing
the mail.
> Other
Em outubro 8, 2019 9:35 David Runge escreveu:
The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion
period, in which Ray can state his case.
I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3 days, not 7.
The voting period is 5 days.
Other than that, the current
On 08.10.19 14:35, David Runge wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal
> of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive
> TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's
> developer status.
>
Hi all,
I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal
of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive
TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's
developer status.
Currently Ray is the maintainer of 60 packages in
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 11:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/7/19 10:59 AM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> > On 10/4/19 9:29 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It's been 15 days (and a couple of hours as I'm aware) since, so
> > > the
On 10/7/19 10:59 AM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/4/19 9:29 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's been 15 days (and a couple of hours as I'm aware) since, so the
>> vote starts now:
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=119
>>
>
>
> Reminder,
On 10/4/19 9:29 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been 15 days (and a couple of hours as I'm aware) since, so the
> vote starts now:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=119
>
Reminder, only 4 days left (aur vote notifications seem to be broken
right now).
Hi,
It's been 15 days (and a couple of hours as I'm aware) since, so the
vote starts now:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=119
Cheers!
-Santiago
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:10:59PM -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:09:31PM +, kpcyrd
On 9/26/19 1:49 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote:
> Vote is now over too, and the results are in:
>
> Yes: 42
> No: 1
> Abstain: 8
>
> So, with a participation of 91.07% that meets the quorum, I can now say
> “Welcome in the team!”.
>
> You can now proceed with
>
Hi,
On 2019-09-26 19:49, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> Vote is now over too, and the results are in:
>
> Yes: 42
> No: 1
> Abstain: 8
>
> So, with a participation of 91.07% that meets the quorum, I can now say
> “Welcome in the team!”.
thank you very much to my sponsors Bruno and Alad for their
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 07:49:52PM +0200, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote:
> Le 19/09/2019 à 19:51, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
> > Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> my name is Jonas Witschel
> Vote is now over too, and the results are in:
>
> Yes: 42
> No: 1
> Abstain: 8
>
> So, with a participation of 91.07% that meets the quorum, I can now say
> “Welcome in the team!”.
>
> You can now proceed with
>
Le 19/09/2019 à 19:51, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
> Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
>>> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:30:05PM +, kpcyrd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:21:42PM -0400, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general
> wrote:
> > Package review:
> >
> > narnia, tr1pd{,-git}: Could use `--locked`?
> >
> > python-fints: Missing `--skip-build` in `package()`.
>
> Thanks, I've
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:21:42PM -0400, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general
wrote:
> Package review:
>
> narnia, tr1pd{,-git}: Could use `--locked`?
>
> python-fints: Missing `--skip-build` in `package()`.
Thanks, I've pushed updates for these a few days ago.
> Only nit I have aside from
Le 19/09/2019 à 19:51, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
> Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
>>> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux
Quoting kpcyrd (2019-09-20 16:09:31)
> Hello,
>
> My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
> sangys and jelles sponsorship.
Glad to see you're finally applying.
Package review:
narnia, tr1pd{,-git}: Could use `--locked`?
python-fints: Missing `--skip-build`
Levente Polyak via aur-general writes:
I'm hereby confirming my sponsorship. kpcyrd is a friend of mine in
both, cyber- and meatspace. He is a very kind person and I like his way
of thinking. His technical skills would be a great benefit for the TU
community.
Even though I'm not one of
On 9/20/19 11:41 PM, kpcyrd wrote:
> Oops, sending the application again, this time with a signature
> attached.
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> Hello,
>
> My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
> sangys and jelles sponsorship.
>
> I'm interested in rust, defensive
Oops, sending the application again, this time with a signature
attached.
--- 8< ---
Hello,
My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
sangys and jelles sponsorship.
I'm interested in rust, defensive programming and offensive security tooling.
Open source
Hy,
Le 20/09/2019 à 22:09, kpcyrd a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
> sangys and jelles sponsorship.
Outside of any other consideration, your email should be PGP-signed. ;)
Regards,
Bruno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 09/20/19 at 08:09pm, kpcyrd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
> sangys and jelles sponsorship.
>
> I'm interested in rust, defensive programming and offensive security tooling.
> Open source became an essential part of my life at
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:09:31PM +, kpcyrd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
> sangys and jelles sponsorship.
I hereby confirm my sponsorship. I think kpcyrd is a very talented oss
developer, a great team player and an overall
Hello,
My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx',
sangys and jelles sponsorship.
I'm interested in rust, defensive programming and offensive security tooling.
Open source became an essential part of my life at some point and the idea of
contributing back to
Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
>> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
>> under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and
> > Well, I think it should be the other way around, you first mentor someone
>
> and look with them into their packages and then decided about sponsorship.
>
> That's your opinion, and here's mine: I don't think that's important. If a
> candidate looks promising and there is an intention to both
I'm reading carefully through the TU bylaws, and I think they need some
clarifications:
> The addition of a TU may occur at any time.
>
> In order to become a TU, one must first find two sponsoring TUs following
the guidelines outlined below, and arrange privately with them
> to announce their
On 9/5/19 5:29 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
>> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
>> under the sponsorship of
Hi there,
On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
> under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter.
I hereby confirm my sponsorship of Jonas.
Hi Rob,
On 2019-09-05 17:42, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> junit-system-rules is fetching a source via http - can this be avoided?
> (http://search.maven.org)
> It appears to be reachable via https.
certainly it can, thanks for spotting this, fixed! I don't really like
fetching prebuilt
On 9/5/19 5:23 PM, Jonas Witschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
> under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter.
>
Hi!
Promising application - I spent a few minutes
On 9/5/19 11:23 AM, Jonas Witschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
> under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter.
>
> A few words about myself: I am a math PhD student
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
> under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter.
>
I hereby confirm my
Hi all,
my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the
AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User
under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter.
A few words about myself: I am a math PhD student and long-time Linux
user. I switched to Arch Linux
On 9/5/19 3:21 PM, Aaron Laws via aur-general wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:45 AM Alexander F Rødseth via aur-general <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>>> Sergej already confirmed sponsorship.
>> I read his reply twice, but I could not see a confirmation of sponsorship.
>> Sergej,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:45 AM Alexander F Rødseth via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > Sergej already confirmed sponsorship.
>
> I read his reply twice, but I could not see a confirmation of sponsorship.
> Sergej, could you please clarify?
>
...
> Have Sergej confirmed his
Hi,
Giancarlo wrote:
> Well, I think it should be the other way around, you first mentor someone
and look with them into their packages and then decided about sponsorship.
That's your opinion, and here's mine: I don't think that's important. If a
candidate looks promising and there is an
On September 4, 2019 4:37:42 PM GMT+02:00, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
wrote:
>Em setembro 4, 2019 9:54 Alexander Rødseth via aur-general escreveu:
>>
>> I did agree to sponsor the TU application of Jean Lucas, provided he
>found
>> another sponsor, but was not aware that he had sent
Em setembro 4, 2019 9:54 Alexander Rødseth via aur-general escreveu:
I did agree to sponsor the TU application of Jean Lucas, provided he found
another sponsor, but was not aware that he had sent his application without
any mentoring on my part.
Well, I think it should be the other way
Hello,
Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation followed by a period of
having little spare time, with regards to work and family.
I did agree to sponsor the TU application of Jean Lucas, provided he found
another sponsor, but was not aware that he had sent his application without
any
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 9:39:37 AM EDT Xyne wrote:
> The lackadaisical approach to sponsorship is one of the main reasons that
> we've moved to a system with two sponsors. Maybe I missed the joke, but
> having nothing against someone and wanting to see a particular package in
> community is
On 2019-08-19 16:49 +0300
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
>>
>> Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it. All
>> this discussion is kind of pointless until we hear from both sponsors
>> telling us they actively sponsor Jean's application.
Em agosto 20, 2019 13:16 Jean Lucas via aur-general escreveu:
Hi Bert, and thank you!
My (latest) key can be found at
https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=jean%404ray.co and
https://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?search=jean%404ray.co=on=vindex
(as well as the servers SKS Keyservers
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 11:01 +0200, Bert Peters via aur-general wrote:
> Hi Jean Lucas,
>
> I've been reading your TU application and I wish you the best of
> luck.
> However, I can't seem to find the GPG key you're using on any
> keyservers. Did you happen to forget to submit it somewhere?
>
>
Hi Jean Lucas,
I've been reading your TU application and I wish you the best of luck.
However, I can't seem to find the GPG key you're using on any
keyservers. Did you happen to forget to submit it somewhere?
Best,
Bert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 16:49 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> > Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it.
> > All
> > this discussion is kind of pointless until we hear from both
> > sponsors
> > telling us they actively sponsor
Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
>
> Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it. All
> this discussion is kind of pointless until we hear from both sponsors
> telling us they actively sponsor Jean's application. Then the discussion
> period can begin.
Ok, I am
Em agosto 19, 2019 9:05 Sergej Pupykin escreveu:
I have nothing against this application. I use parsedmarc package
(slightly modified for my needs) which maintained by Jean.
Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it. All
this discussion is kind of pointless until we
> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
> for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
I have nothing against this application. I use parsedmarc package
(slightly modified for my
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 01:14 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/18/19 12:26 AM, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
> > > > - This appears to me it's a -bin package
> > >
> > > Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package
> > > on the
> > > NPM registry.
> > >
> >
> >
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 22:51 -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a
> > great OS!
>
> Always happy to help! :)
>
> It's customary to
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 17:56 +0200, David Runge wrote:
> On 2019-08-16 17:10:41 (-0400), Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > I would definitely be willing to very politely ask the five
> > respective
> > companies for redistribution permissions for Arch Linux.
> In the case of reaper, I've
On 2019-08-16 17:10:41 (-0400), Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> I would definitely be willing to very politely ask the five respective
> companies for redistribution permissions for Arch Linux.
In the case of reaper, I've already been in contact with Cockos to try
and move that to [community]
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 23:46 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/17/19 2:49 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > That said, I think its a bit unfair to say that I went off and
> > found
> > another sponsor without batting an eye - asking Alexander and
> > Sergej
> > seemed
On 8/18/19 12:26 AM, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
>>> - This appears to me it's a -bin package
>>
>> Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package on the
>> NPM registry.
>>
>
> well, judging from the lack of build() I'd assume so. I'm not too
> familiar with npm, but if t is
> > - This appears to me it's a -bin package
>
> Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package on the
> NPM registry.
>
well, judging from the lack of build() I'd assume so. I'm not too
familiar with npm, but if t is running build commands (as you concede
down in the email it
On 8/17/19 10:51 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a great OS!
>
> Always happy to help! :)
>
> It's customary to review
On 8/17/19 2:49 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> That said, I think its a bit unfair to say that I went off and found
> another sponsor without batting an eye - asking Alexander and Sergej
> seemed appropriate as they'd both adopted one of my packages, I had
> worked with you to resolve
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a great OS!
Always happy to help! :)
It's customary to review PKGBUILDS for new applicants. This is somewhat
of a quick/cursory review over
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 02:12 +0200, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> > I reached out to Alad sometime in between, but he never responded
> > to my profile review request;
>
> While I don't claim to be the most apt in responding to emails, I see
> no Jean Lucas orj...@4ray.co in my mailbox.
>
I reached out to Alad sometime in between, but he never responded to my profile review request;
While I don't claim to be the most apt in responding to emails, I see no Jean
Lucas orj...@4ray.co in my mailbox.
I guess that's why I did not respond then.
That said, I think its a bit unfair to
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 21:58 +0200, Robin Broda wrote:
> On 8/17/19 8:49 PM, Jean Lucas wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> >
> > On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:13 +0200, Robin Broda via aur-general
> > wrote:
> > > On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > > > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending
On 8/17/19 8:49 PM, Jean Lucas wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:13 +0200, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
>> On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
>>> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my
>>> candidacy
>>> for Trusted User member. As per
Hi Robin,
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:13 +0200, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my
> > candidacy
> > for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm
On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
> for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
How many TUs did you ask for
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 02:00 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general
wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 01:35, Josef Miegl wrote:
>
> > On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-
> > general" <
> > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 01:35, Josef Miegl wrote:
> On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-general" <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> >anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, unity-editor and unityhub are
> >proprietary software with restrictive license. I don't think
On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-general"
wrote:
>anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, unity-editor and unityhub are
>proprietary software with restrictive license. I don't think that you
>can legally distribute them
Even if we could, is there a reason to flood
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 17:47 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/16/19 3:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my
> > candidacy
> > for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> >
On 8/16/19 3:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
> for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
>
> I've been an Arch Linux
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 22:40 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general
wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:35, Oscar wrote:
>
> > I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't
> > think they
> > will allow redistribution of binaries.
> >
> > They even dropped the official Ubuntu
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 22:45 +0200, Levente Polyak via aur-general
wrote:
> On August 16, 2019 9:19:56 PM GMT+02:00, Jean Lucas via aur-general <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
> > following packages (all having over 10
On August 16, 2019 9:19:56 PM GMT+02:00, Jean Lucas via aur-general
wrote:
>
>If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
>following packages (all having over 10 votes in the AUR) from the AUR
>into [community]:
>
>... , downgrade,...
>
It's never been official in the
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:35, Oscar wrote:
> I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't think they
> will allow redistribution of binaries.
>
> They even dropped the official Ubuntu packages in favor of their custom
> installers. And honestly it makes more sense to do it
I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't think they
will allow redistribution of binaries.
They even dropped the official Ubuntu packages in favor of their custom
installers. And honestly it makes more sense to do it this way because the
engine is a big self contained blob
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 22:06 Balló György via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> 2019. 08. 16, péntek keltezéssel 15.19-kor Jean Lucas via aur-general
> ezt írta:
> > If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
> > following packages (all having over 10 votes
2019. 08. 16, péntek keltezéssel 15.19-kor Jean Lucas via aur-general
ezt írta:
> If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
> following packages (all having over 10 votes in the AUR) from the AUR
> into [community]:
>
> anydesk, downgrade, exercism, flutter, godot, itch,
Hi all,
My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
I've been an Arch Linux user since around a little before I registered
my AUR account (January
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
---
This is not an amendment to the bylaws themselves, and as such does not
require any sort of vote. But I think this is rather useful to have, as
there is currently not a case of perfect clarity for the administrivium
involved in processing updates. As development
On 23/1/19 12:11 am, Bert Peters via aur-general wrote:
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 16:10:
On January 22, 2019 4:03:29 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 16:10:
On January 22, 2019 4:03:29 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
David Runge
On January 22, 2019 4:03:29 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
>Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
>> On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
>> wrote:
>>> David Runge schreef op 2019-01-22 12:30:
On 2019-01-22 17:09:35
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
David Runge schreef op 2019-01-22 12:30:
On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote:
On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
Why is use
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
>David Runge schreef op 2019-01-22 12:30:
>> On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote:
>>> On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
>>> Why is use
>>> `$(gem env gemdir)`
>>>
>>> Instead of
>>>
>>>
David Runge schreef op 2019-01-22 12:30:
On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote:
On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
Why is use
`$(gem env gemdir)`
Instead of
`$(ruby -e'puts Gem.default_dir')`
It's shorter and you don't have to spawn a ruby process to print
On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote:
> On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
> > * pkgname: avoid composition
> What should I do?
It's more readable and less error-prone to do `pkgname=name` instead of
`pkgname="name${something_else}"`.
> Why is use
> `$(gem env
On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
> * ruby-websockets-extensions
> * pkgname: avoid composition
What should I do?
> * arch: single quotes missing
> * url: use double quotes
> * license: single quotes missing
> * depends: single quotes missing
> * makedepends: single quotes
On January 19, 2019 1:42:38 AM EST, Chih-Hsuan Yen via aur-general
wrote:
>
>On 2019/1/10 下午11:24, Jiachen YANG via aur-general wrote:
>> Dear all TUs
>>
>>
>> The disscussion period of 2 weeks is over! Let's start the voting
>period~
>>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=116
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
On 2019/1/10 下午11:24, Jiachen YANG via aur-general wrote:
> Dear all TUs
>
>
> The disscussion period of 2 weeks is over! Let's start the voting period~
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=116
>
>
> --
>
> Jiachen YANG (farseerfc)
>
>
Yes: 5
No: 36
Abstain: 8
Voted: 87.50%
Result: Rejected
Dear all TUs
The disscussion period of 2 weeks is over! Let's start the voting period~
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=116
--
Jiachen YANG (farseerfc)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 03:35:28PM +0800, Metal A-wing wrote:
> I started using Ubuntu in high school.
> And I use Debian at university.
> In 2017, I started Archlinux
>
> I also tried other distributions. linux mint, deepin linux, gentoo, centos
This seems fairly rushed.
The AUR registration
Besides what has been outlined by Eli and JereBear, there are some more general
remarks I would like to make. I'll start with the first (or "second", since the
actual first application was a single sentence) application email. [1]
> I think dpkg package manage is too complicated (...)
I think
> > - [ ] source_x86_64: should be source, don't upload binary data to the
> > AUR,
> >
>
> About source binary. Improve the build speed of AUR, Reduce makedependence
> The result of the build is the same
This is a fundamental mis-understanding of both the purpose of the AUR and the
101 - 200 of 2288 matches
Mail list logo
