Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

First of all, your email client has broken the email thread. ;) On 1/9/19 11:20 AM, Metal A-wing wrote: > Oh. yes https://github.com/archlinux/archweb/ and https://git.archlinux.org/aurweb.git/about/ (both are python, not ruby) But these are community projects that can be contributed to even

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

Hi, Le 09/01/2019 à 17:20, Metal A-wing a écrit : >> * [ ] source_x86_64: should be source, don't upload binary data to the >> AUR, > About source binary. Improve the build speed of AUR, Reduce makedependence > The result of the build is the same What do you mean by “same” and how did you

[aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote: > > I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. > Not so easy for reviews, if you're applying between Christmas and New > Years (lots of people are not home and/or busy hanging out with people > then). > > > I am a Web Developer. uav

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

On 2018-12-27 15:50:49 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote: > I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. Not so easy for reviews, if you're applying between Christmas and New Years (lots of people are not home and/or busy hanging out with people then). > I am a Web Developer. uav cloud

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

Metal A-wing 於 2018/12/27 下午3:50 寫道: > Hi everyone, > > I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. > > I (nickname a-wing) would like to apply to be a Trusted User. > Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125) && Jiachen Yang (farseerfc) will be my sponsor. > > Some basic information about myself, >

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

On 2018/12/27 16:50, Metal A-wing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. > > I (nickname a-wing) would like to apply to be a Trusted User. > Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125) && Jiachen Yang (farseerfc) will be my sponsor. Dear All, I confirm my sponsorship

[aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

Hi everyone, I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. I (nickname a-wing) would like to apply to be a Trusted User. Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125) && Jiachen Yang (farseerfc) will be my sponsor. Some basic information about myself, My Chinese name is YongXin SHI. I am 23 years old, and

[aur-general] TU Application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

Hi everyone, I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. I (nickname a-wing) would like to apply to be a Trusted User. Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125) && Jiachen Yang (farseerfc) will be my sponsor. Some basic information about myself, My Chinese name is YongXin SHI. I am 23 years old, and

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

Chih-Hsuan Yen 於 2018/12/25 下午4:13 寫道: > Brett Cornwall via aur-general 於 2018/12/25 下午3:54 寫道: >> On December 25, 2018 12:50:41 AM MST, Metal A-wing <1@233.email> wrote: >>> I want to push `ruby-rails` and `ruby-*` packages to the official repo >> Who is your sponsor? Can you tell us more about

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

On Tue, 2018-12-25 at 10:05 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:13 AM Chih-Hsuan Yen via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > I don't like this. I does not appear as though Metal A-wing put in > anyresearch into this (going to the archives, checking

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:13 AM Chih-Hsuan Yen via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > Brett Cornwall via aur-general 於 2018/12/25 下午3:54 寫道: > > > > On December 25, 2018 12:50:41 AM MST, Metal A-wing <1@233.email> wrote: > >> I want to push `ruby-rails` and `ruby-*` packages to

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

Brett Cornwall via aur-general 於 2018/12/25 下午3:54 寫道: > > On December 25, 2018 12:50:41 AM MST, Metal A-wing <1@233.email> wrote: >> I want to push `ruby-rails` and `ruby-*` packages to the official repo > Who is your sponsor? Can you tell us more about why you should be a TU? > >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

On December 25, 2018 12:50:41 AM MST, Metal A-wing <1@233.email> wrote: >I want to push `ruby-rails` and `ruby-*` packages to the official repo Who is your sponsor? Can you tell us more about why you should be a TU? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_user#How_do_I_become_a_TU?

[aur-general] TU application: a-wing

I want to push `ruby-rails` and `ruby-*` packages to the official repo signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/21/18 5:03 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > Yo! > > The vote is over and the results are inn! > > Yes: 22 > No: 15 > Abstain: 12 > Participation:89.09% > > Congratulations! I have updated the AUR account. > > Please follow the TODO and

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 21:03, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > > Yo! > > The vote is over and the results are inn! > > Yes: 22 > No: 15 > Abstain: 12 > Participation:89.09% > > Congratulations! I have updated the AUR account. > > Please follow the

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Yo! The vote is over and the results are inn! Yes: 22 No: 15 Abstain: 12 Participation:89.09% Congratulations! I have updated the AUR account. Please follow the TODO and poke me with any questions you have :)

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/17/18 1:23 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > And I stand by my opinion. It's ridiculous to think that one person, > even if member of GitHub organization (which may or may not mean > anything), can single-handedly affect decision of either project. It's > difficult even here

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Em dezembro 17, 2018 5:23 Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general escreveu: I fail to understand how discussion got where it is now. Is sponsorship process about packaging quality and candidate in general or pushing some agenda through projects that applicant is helping with? I don't believe I

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

wt., 11.12.2018, 20:45: Alad Wenter via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> napisał(a): > On 12/11/18 8:30 PM, Alad Wenter wrote: > > > Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion... > > > > Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new > >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 17/12/2018 08.23, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > can single-handedly affect decision of either project s/either/entire/ I haven't had my coffee yet.

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 17/12/2018 07.53, Daurnimator wrote: > I was told that there were no TUs with much Lua experience, and that > it would be nice to have a trusted user to review Lua changes/packages > with knowledge and care of the Lua community. > This would reduce the phenomenon of the "Absentee business

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 17:23, Eli Schwartz wrote:> > I'm finding it very hard to imagine why c89, game developers, > microcontroller users, or people who care about performance would be at > all opposed to distributing an inert text file. I guess Windows users > might feel like it is a waste, but

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/16/18 11:27 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > It does have LIBFLAG which I believe should be contain LDFLAGS. > See https://github.com/luarocks/luarocks/issues/429 I don't know what this means. Does it or doesn't it? Shall I assume that its being open for several years with no activity at all means

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Sorry for delayed reply, I've been travelling. On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 14:44, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > The luarocks github repository has references to CFLAGS, so it seems to > support that already. It does *not* have references to LDFLAGS or > CPPFLAGS, not sure what to think of

[aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/13/18 8:46 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > There's no positive or negative reply to it, because there's still > questions left unanswered. > > 1. Coderobe's comment on use of sed in iup went disregarded. [1] (It > appears the https source was addressed, and Daurnimator commented on

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

There's no positive or negative reply to it, because there's still questions left unanswered. 1. Coderobe's comment on use of sed in iup went disregarded. [1] (It appears the https source was addressed, and Daurnimator commented on the static linking.) 2. We don't know why luarocks would be a

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:20:22PM +0100, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > As of the recent discussions; We could try the "co-sponsorship" before the > voting process? Say one or two people confirm they think the voting process > should be continued after the discussion has ended? There

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

. On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 14:44, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Do you mean they removed a pc rather than an echo target? Yes, sorry for confusion. > If lua does not officially compile a C++ version, it is the job of > Debian to both provide their own pkg-config files, and modify lua to >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 4:21 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 13:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general > wrote: >> Lua *does* provide a "make pc" target. > > Only lua 5.1 does, it was removed in the lua 5.2 release. Due to > disagreements between debian and fedora lua package maintainers about >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 13:28, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Can you point me to a bug report or pull request or mailing list > discussion or other form of discussion in the lua community where the > topic of pkg-config has been previously discussed and rejected as too > political? Because

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 3:51 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > I think the better solution is to try and get different distros to use > the same formats and try and unify it all with e.g. pkg-config. > However that's a long and political process. lua *has* a pkg-config file already, it just exists as documentation in

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 13:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Lua *does* provide a "make pc" target. Only lua 5.1 does, it was removed in the lua 5.2 release. Due to disagreements between debian and fedora lua package maintainers about what it should contain. > Admittedly, this target is

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 3:00 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general > wrote: >> 1. When I look at LUA modules, I see that most are available on >> "luarocks", which is apparently a package manager for LUA. Can you >> leverage this to make more LUA modules available

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 3:10 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:04, Robin Broda via aur-general > wrote: >> >> On 12/11/18 9:00 PM, Daurnimator wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general >>> wrote: 2. You have some AUR packages for LUA modules of your own

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:47, Ivy Foster via aur-general wrote: > Yikes! > > One ugly but workable solution could be to conditionally set variables > in a Makefile. For instance: > > ifeq ($(OS),Windows_NT) # for Windows versions >= NT > LUA :=

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 11 Dec 2018, at 12:10 pm -0800, Daurnimator wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:04, Robin Broda via aur-general > wrote: > > On 12/11/18 9:00 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general > > > wrote: > > >> 2. You have some AUR packages for LUA

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:25, Ivy Foster via aur-general wrote: > Looking at arcan, why do you break it up into so many different > sub-packages? I understand that they provide different tools, but > typically Arch just packages toolsuites together unless there's a > compelling reason to separate

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Thanks for the application, Daurnimator! Looking at arcan, why do you break it up into so many different sub-packages? I understand that they provide different tools, but typically Arch just packages toolsuites together unless there's a compelling reason to separate some of them. Also, libarena

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 12:04, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > > On 12/11/18 9:00 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general > > wrote: > >> 2. You have some AUR packages for LUA modules of your own making, yet > >> they hardcode gcc lines instead of

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 9:00 PM, Daurnimator wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general > wrote: >> 2. You have some AUR packages for LUA modules of your own making, yet >> they hardcode gcc lines instead of using a Makefile. [1] (At least they >> respect $CFLAGS and $LDFLAGS, I

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:45, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > 1. When I look at LUA modules, I see that most are available on > "luarocks", which is apparently a package manager for LUA. Can you > leverage this to make more LUA modules available on Arch? Note that it's "Lua" not LUA. I'd

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 8:45 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On 12/11/18 8:30 PM, Alad Wenter wrote: > >> Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion... >> >> Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new >> applications per month. That makes a thorough

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 8:30 PM, Alad Wenter wrote: > Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion... > > Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new > applications per month. That makes a thorough review difficult. > > Considering the positive experiences of the

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion... Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new applications per month. That makes a thorough review difficult. Considering the positive experiences of the sponsor, it would be a shame to let a voting period

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Quoting Ivy Foster via aur-general (2018-12-06 14:38:10) > Hello, everyone! > > The results are in! Congratulations, Daniel! Welcome to the team. > > Stats: > 34 Yes > 6 No > 7 Abstain > > Cheers, > Ivy ("escondida") > > P.S.: Please forgive the broken threading; I

[aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Hello, everyone! The results are in! Congratulations, Daniel! Welcome to the team. Stats: 34 Yes 6 No 7 Abstain Cheers, Ivy ("escondida") P.S.: Please forgive the broken threading; I foolishly cleaned out too much of my inbox last week! signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

The two week discussion period is over! Let the voting period begin! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=114 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 02:20, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > I confirm my sponsorship of Daurnimator! Thank you for sponsoring! Also, I was just informed that a TU application should contain links :D Me: AUR profile:

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 11/29/18 at 02:03am, Daurnimator wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi all, > > I'm applying to be a Trusted User; Foxboron has kindly sponsored me and has > been mentoring me on the specifics over the last couple of months. > > I've been using Arch since 2010,

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:03:33AM +1100, Daurnimator wrote: > I'm applying to be a Trusted User; Foxboron has kindly sponsored me and has > been mentoring me on the specifics over the last couple of months. Yo! I confirm my sponsorship of Daurnimator! Because of the recent discussion regarding

[aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, I'm applying to be a Trusted User; Foxboron has kindly sponsored me and has been mentoring me on the specifics over the last couple of months. I've been using Arch since 2010, having been present in #archlinux almost the whole time! Before

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

On 11/20/18 12:30 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > Yo! The vote is over, and the results are inn! > > Yes: 33 > No: 10 > Abstain: 9 > Participation: 100%(!!!) > > Congratulations! I have update your AUR account :) > > Pleaase follow the TODO

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Le 20/11/2018 à 15:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 11/20/18 6:30 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >> Yo! The vote is over, and the results are inn! >> >> Yes: 33 >> No: 10 >> Abstain: 9 >> Participation: 100%(!!!) > (That would be

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

On 11/20/18 6:30 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > Yo! The vote is over, and the results are inn! > > Yes: 33 > No: 10 > Abstain: 9 > Participation: 100%(!!!) (That would be pretty neat. But I'm super confused, since aurweb says we had 53 TUs and

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Yo! The vote is over, and the results are inn! Yes: 33 No: 10 Abstain: 9 Participation: 100%(!!!) Congratulations! I have update your AUR account :) Pleaase follow the TODO and poke me for any questions you have going forward!

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/16/18 08:11pm, David Runge wrote: The results are in (the vote ended nearly an hour ago)! Thank you all. To those that voted 'No': Feel free to send me a message with your feedback. Your concerns would be a valuable asset for me to keep in mind. signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 2018-11-09 19:05:58 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > Let's vote! :) The results are in (the vote ended nearly an hour ago)! Yes: 26 No:9 Abstain: 12 Participation 90.38% (come on, don't drop the ball on this! ;-)) I have just updated your account status in

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-15 05:19:10) > On 11/15/18 5:50 AM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > >> - tests are awesome <3 run them whenever possible! more is better! > >> pulling sources from github is favorable when you get free tests > >> and sometimes

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:51:31PM -0500, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Eli Schwartz via aur-general (2018-11-15 00:52:50) > > On 11/14/18 11:50 PM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > > > Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) > > >> - tests are

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

On 11/16/18 12:51 AM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Eli Schwartz via aur-general (2018-11-15 00:52:50) >> On 11/14/18 11:50 PM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: >>> Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) - tests are awesome <3 run them

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Quoting Eli Schwartz via aur-general (2018-11-15 00:52:50) > On 11/14/18 11:50 PM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > > Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) > >> - tests are awesome <3 run them whenever possible! more is better! > >> pulling sources from github is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

On 11/15/18 5:50 AM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: >> - tests are awesome <3 run them whenever possible! more is better! >> pulling sources from github is favorable when you get free tests >> and sometimes manpages/docs > > Will work with the upstreams to distribute these. I prefer

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

On 11/14/18 11:50 PM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) >> - tests are awesome <3 run them whenever possible! more is better! >> pulling sources from github is favorable when you get free tests >> and sometimes manpages/docs

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) > Hi Daniel, > > Small summary of things I repeatedly noticed: > > - # Generated by mksrcinfo v8 Wed Nov 14 05:46:26 UTC 2018 > I would say remove this ancient package from your system > and use makepkg --printsrcinfo instead

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Hi Daniel, Small summary of things I repeatedly noticed: - # Generated by mksrcinfo v8 Wed Nov 14 05:46:26 UTC 2018 I would say remove this ancient package from your system and use makepkg --printsrcinfo instead - if a setup.py uses entry_points for scripts that means setuptools is not

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

> - The following can be used for GitHub releases (where $url is eg. >> ): >> >> - Before: >> `source=("$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz::$url/archive/v$pkgver.tar.gz")` >> - After: `source=("$url/archive/v$pkgver/$pkgname-v$pkgver.tar.gz")` > > > Correction:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

> > - The following can be used for GitHub releases (where $url is eg. > ): > > - Before: > `source=("$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz::$url/archive/v$pkgver.tar.gz")` > - After: `source=("$url/archive/v$pkgver/$pkgname-v$pkgver.tar.gz")` Correction:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

I confirm my sponsorship; let the games (or discussion, I guess) begin! iff ("escondida") signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

Hello, My name is Daniel M. Capella (aka polyzen), and I am applying to be a Trusted User with Ivy Foster's sponsorship. My current main interest lies in Rustlang-based blockchain/distributed app/cryptocurrency implementations; half for the tech, half so I can escape the world of indentured

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Yo! The discussion period is over and the voting has begun! Great review session everyone, and I hope we can see more things like that in the future :) https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=113 -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hi William, Le 11/11/2018 à 15:07, William Gathoye a écrit : > Hello Bruno, > > On 6/11/18 10:24, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> is wrong. We have managed to do that in cozy-stack, gitea and >> matterbridge to only cite a few (also in mattermost, but the >> corresponding code is not

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hello Bruno, On 6/11/18 10:24, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: > > is wrong. We have managed to do that in cozy-stack, gitea and > matterbridge to only cite a few (also in mattermost, but the > corresponding code is not committed anywhere since this is an AUR > package not maintained by one

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 2018-11-09 13:11:19 (-0500), Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > This definitely lists the right time period: > https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html#_addition_of_a_tu Yep, sorry, that was just a brainfart from my side. ;-) Here's the link to the vote btw:

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/9/18 1:05 PM, David Runge wrote: > As the (newish, but still not updated [1]) discussion period of 14 days > is now over, I have started the vote. > > Thanks again to all reviewers and active TUs in this discussion period! > I think Brett will make a good TU! > > Let's vote! :) > > [1] >

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

As the (newish, but still not updated [1]) discussion period of 14 days is now over, I have started the vote. Thanks again to all reviewers and active TUs in this discussion period! I think Brett will make a good TU! Let's vote! :) [1]

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

Le 08/11/2018 à 04:34, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general a écrit : >>>- I noticed that you didn't add a LICENSE file for this package. >> Artistic2.0 is a uncommonly used common license! >> (/usr/share/licenses/common/Artistic2.0/license.txt) >> >> > Yes, my bad. I was told about this on

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:04:43PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Because their tarballs used to be insane. And giving you the tarball for > master is a regression they fixed, not an API they dropped. :p It's an API url they dropped. They moved it around and instead of 404'd they

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/7/18 10:44 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > It happened to me with gitlab and their releases url, which started > defaulting to "I don't recognize this branch parameter, so here's the > tarball for master"[1] Yes, gitlab is prone to bugs like this. :p gitlab also includes

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

> > - I noticed that you didn't add a LICENSE file for this package. > > This checks out, Artistic2.0 is a common license. Yes, my bad. For this and the rest of the licenses below I assumed it was the same case as MIT and such. > > - hib-dlagent: > > - I see that you backported a patch

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

> >- I marked the package as out-of-date, as there appears to be a new > > version (3.1.4.15) as of almost two months ago. > > Long story short, that was pretty much exactly during the time when I > accidentally clobbered my urlwatch file. Thanks for bringing that up to me. > > >- I

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/07/18 09:28pm, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: Hello Brett. I took some time to randomly sample your PKGBUILDs and give some feedback: - ags: - it appears that you use sed to change CFLAGS in the makefile definition, although it appears that the Makefile itself lets you

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/7/18 9:28 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > Hello Brett. > > I took some time to randomly sample your PKGBUILDs and give some > feedback: > > - ags: > - it appears that you use sed to change CFLAGS in the makefile > definition, although it appears that the

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

Hello Brett. I took some time to randomly sample your PKGBUILDs and give some feedback: - ags: - it appears that you use sed to change CFLAGS in the makefile definition, although it appears that the Makefile itself lets you overwrite them. I'd advice trying to use native tooling

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 07 Nov 2018, at 5:41 pm -0700, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > > - don't think pkgdesc should ever end with a dot > The descriptions are often sentences, so would it not reason to end them > with a period? In the case of

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:45:01PM -0700, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > > creeper-world2 > > I've had two AUR requests queued up for some time now; deleting this package > is one of them. Quick update: I addressed your

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: creeper-world2 I've had two AUR requests queued up for some time now; deleting this package is one of them. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: some small questions and hints first: I'm nearly done with following your excellent suggestions but I have responses and questions. It looks like several packages have different issues preventing to build in clean chrooted

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Thanks Levente! A lot of little gems, will take care of these as well. > But before we start, can't resist mumbling a small 'meh' for all this > non build content hosted in the AUR. meh. meh taken, meh addressed! Both tools live on Github now :P > kak-lsp: > - someone should push a non git

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hi Maxim, some feedback to your packages that others did not yet bring up (so pelase go through jelle's as well, i did not include them again): But before we start, can't resist mumbling a small 'meh' for all this non build content hosted in the AUR. meh. browserpass: - just a nitpick, but

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

> The general statement that .install is not meant for documentation is > correct, if this falls under the category of being well suited for > .install is interpretation and debatable. Personally i don't see basic > fontconfig knowledge to fall under this category and IMO its > documentation that

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: Hi Brett, some small questions and hints first: Thank you for such a thorough vetting, Levente! I'm fixing these ASAP. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Le 06/11/2018 à 10:36, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : > On November 6, 2018 10:24:43 AM GMT+01:00, Bruno Pagani > wrote: >> Le 06/11/2018 à 02:13, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : >>> Hi Maxim, >>> >>> On 11/6/18 1:05 AM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: > You might want to

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

On November 6, 2018 10:24:43 AM GMT+01:00, Bruno Pagani wrote: > >Le 06/11/2018 à 02:13, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : >> Hi Maxim, >> >> On 11/6/18 1:05 AM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: You might want to use go-pie btw, to actually have PIE support browserpass W:

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hi, I didn’t read everything yet because I lack the time for this, but… Le 06/11/2018 à 02:13, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : > Hi Maxim, > > On 11/6/18 1:05 AM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: >>> You might want to use go-pie btw, to actually have PIE support >>> >>> browserpass W:

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

On 11/5/18 8:33 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On 11/6/18 2:22 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 11/5/18 7:05 PM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: >>> Same question here, but actually worth confirming with you: is it a bad >>> practice >>> to execute "systemctl

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

On 11/6/18 2:22 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 11/5/18 7:05 PM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: >> Same question here, but actually worth confirming with you: is it a bad >> practice >> to execute "systemctl daemon-reload" in post_install() function? I've seen >> people >> do

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

On 11/5/18 7:05 PM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: >>> - wire-desktop (76): End-to-end encrypted messaging app that works on >>> Windows, >>> Linux, Mac, Android and iPhone. It is free, open-source and available >>> on Github. Although I'm co-maintaining this package on AUR, I was mostly >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hi Maxim, On 11/6/18 1:05 AM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: >> You might want to use go-pie btw, to actually have PIE support >> >> browserpass W: ELF file ('usr/bin/browserpass') lacks FULL RELRO, check >> LDFLAGS. >> browserpass W: ELF file ('usr/bin/browserpass') lacks PIE. > > Nice, will

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Woohoo, reviews :) Thank you for your time Jelle! >> - kak-lsp: de-facto official plugin that adds LSP support for kakoune editor. > > - You should pass --locked to, so that the Cargo.lock file is adhered. > (reproducibility) Nice one, added! > - The package has 3 votes, the TU guidelines

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >