Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

Hey, good luck and such Just noticed there are packages that don't properly LDFLAGS resulting in binaries without full RELRO. Its good to always checksec the binaries once creating or adopting a new package and see if everything was setup properly to respect hardening and other flags like generic

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 27 Jan 2018, at 10:40 +0100, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:23:08PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > Hello Ivy, > Do you plan to adopt some orphans as well? Definitely! Quickly scanning through the list, a few stand out to me...though they generally don't

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:23:08PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > # Packages > [..] Hello Ivy, Do you plan to adopt some orphans as well? chris signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 27 Jan 2018, at 9:39 +0100, Pierre Neidhardt, Andrew Crerar, and Johannes Löthberg wrote: > [some very nice things] Thanks!

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 26 Jan 2018, at 4:35 -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 01/26/2018 04:23 PM, Ivy Foster wrote: > > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > > be my sponsor. > It is great to see you take the plunge, I wish you the best of luck! Thanks! > > Arch

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

Thank you Ivy for this excellent list of applications, one of the best I've seen in a while! :) -- Pierre Neidhardt I'd rather just believe that it's done by little elves running around. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 1/26/18 4:23 PM, Ivy Foster wrote: > Hi, folks, > Hi! > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > be my sponsor. > > I've been an Arch user for the last 10 years or so. Some of you may > know me from IRC or the forums, where I use the nick escondida. > Lately,

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

Hey, Quoting Ivy Foster (2018-01-26 22:23:08) > Hi, folks, > > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > be my sponsor. > Don't really have anything to say other than "Awesome!" -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 PGP Key FP:

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature. My mistake! Here's my official, signed reply. Eli Schwartz wrote: > Lukas has beaten you to it: https://packages.archlinux.org/ledger That is excellent news!

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On 01/26/2018 04:23 PM, Ivy Foster wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > be my sponsor. It is great to see you take the plunge, I wish you the best of luck! > Arch has always been a rewarding community to contribute to, and I > figure

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:23:08PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > be my sponsor. > I hereby confirm my sponsorship. Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature. Thanks! Alad signature.asc

[aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

Hi, folks, I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to be my sponsor. I've been an Arch user for the last 10 years or so. Some of you may know me from IRC or the forums, where I use the nick escondida. Lately, I've been much less active on IRC, but have contributed a

[aur-general] TU resignation

Hi everyone, for a long time I've been both a developer and TU. As a trusted user I wasn't really involved with anything beyond looking for people that could be a good fit to Arch. With recent additions to the team, I'm sure you can keep the ball rolling on your own. Therefore I'm resigning from

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/23/2018 12:54 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the >> Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" >> >> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz >> --- >> >> Handy link to

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/23/2018 02:16 PM, Balló György via aur-general wrote: >> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for >> grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted? > > Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account > or do anything other than resolving

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for > grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted? Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account or do anything other than resolving package requests (which is tracked on aur-requests mailing list)?

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the > Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" > > Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz > --- > > Handy link to context and surrounding discussion: > >

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 01/21/2018 04:19 PM, Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:40:43, Xyne wrote: >> On 2018-01-21 10:04 +0100 >> Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: >> >>> So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the >>> "OR") altogether? >> >> I made no

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:40:43, Xyne wrote: > On 2018-01-21 10:04 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: > > >So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the > >"OR") altogether? > > I made no such suggestion. By your logic, there is no situation where the first

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 2018-01-21 10:04 +0100 Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote: >So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the >"OR") altogether? I made no such suggestion. With the current bylaws, any 2 TUs can start a regular removal process for any reason. This suffices to remove TUs

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:24:49, Xyne wrote: > > The intent of the first sectionm before the "OR", is to measure any sort of > > activity. Updating a package, voting or posting a comment shows that the TU > > is still logging in to the AUR and thus active in some sense. The point of > > the first

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 2018-01-19 09:16 +0100 Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general wrote: >My common sense tells me that activity that helps Arch Linux to >prosper should be considered – be it packaging, triaging AUR requests >etc. > >From that point of view, it makes sense to not count voting as TU >activity, thereby

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:18:11PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > +2. performed any action that required TU privileges on the AUR, for example > +resolving package requests, modifying user accounts, or force pushing to a > +package base, but NOT including participation in a voting

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

On 19 January 2018 at 00:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the > Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" > > Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz > --- > > Handy link to

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz --- Handy link to context and surrounding discussion:

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

Hi Eli Welcome to the TU team! It's been pleasure for me to work with you before. And now when you officially became TU there are more possibilities for you to bring your knowledge and passion to Arch Linux. Congrats, Eli! On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Sébastien Luttringer

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 22:34 +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > On 2017-12-18 16:07, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > > On 2017-12-13 14:52, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > > > On 2017-12-13 13:57, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > > > > Hello,

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 12/25/2017 04:34 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > The vote has ended as well. TLDR: Eli, welcome aboard! > > Results: > > Yes: 36 > No: 2 > Abstain: 2 > > Eli, please follow steps described here[1]. There is additional > documentation[2] that will concern you after you get

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 2017-12-18 16:07, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > On 2017-12-13 14:52, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: >> On 2017-12-13 13:57, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >>> Hello, all. :) >>> >>> My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 12/18/2017 07:55 AM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > calibre-installer: > - nothing i would call common to enable and start units or timers on install I think I've had this discussion with someone else before, but my reasons basically boil down to 1) the timer is the main purpose of

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 2017-12-13 14:52, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > On 2017-12-13 13:57, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> Hello, all. :) >> >> My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], >> AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally >>

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 12/13/2017 01:57 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Hello, all. :) > > My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], > AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally > everywhere I can stick my nose in. With the aid of Bartłomiej >

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 2017-12-13 16:40 +0100 Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >* Allan no longer breaking things. A few years ago I would have dismissed that as impossible but since then we seem to be living in some sort of alternate crazy reality. At least we would have proof that the universe has changed.

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

> Hmm, the meticulous reviewer of TU candidates now applies for TU... I'm > unsure if this will result in either > > * the singularity, > * an infinite energy source, > > or, - shivers down my spine - > > * Allan no longer breaking things. > > However that may be, you've submitted a model

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 13. Dezember > 2017 um 13:57 geschrieben: > > > Hello, all. :) > > My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], > AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally > everywhere I

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 2017-12-13 14:52, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > On 2017-12-13 13:57, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> Hello, all. :) >> >> My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], >> AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally >>

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

On 2017-12-13 13:57, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Hello, all. :) > > My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], > AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally > everywhere I can stick my nose in. With the aid of Bartłomiej >

[aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

Hello, all. :) My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally everywhere I can stick my nose in. With the aid of Bartłomiej Piotrowski, I am applying today to become a TU. I'm 24 years old, and

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/29/17 4:43 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: On 11/29/2017 04:10 PM, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-22 20:58:02) Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-17 13:25:20) I confirm my sponsorship and all that jazz. Let the discussion period

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/29/2017 04:10 PM, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-22 20:58:02) >> Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-17 13:25:20) >>> I confirm my sponsorship and all that jazz. Let the discussion period >>> begin. >> >> Discussion period is over, and the

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-22 20:58:02) > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-17 13:25:20) > > I confirm my sponsorship and all that jazz. Let the discussion period > > begin. > > Discussion period is over, and the polling stations are ready. > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=98 > So

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-11-17 13:25:20) > I confirm my sponsorship and all that jazz. Let the discussion period > begin. Discussion period is over, and the polling stations are ready. https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=98 -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/21/17 3:17 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: On 11/21/2017 11:41 AM, Andrew Crerar wrote: I double checked this one and I am adding git-shell to /etc/shells within the install file [2]. This is the same behavior as git in [extra] [3]. Whoops, I must have gotten confused while `diff`ing your files

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/21/2017 11:41 AM, Andrew Crerar wrote: > I double checked this one and I am adding git-shell to /etc/shells within the > install file [2]. This is the same behavior as git in [extra] [3]. Whoops, I must have gotten confused while `diff`ing your files against the version in extra. > I dug

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On November 21, 2017 5:41:19 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Crerar wrote: >> opencv-git: >> - The repo package has hdf5 as a makedepends/optdepends, why is this >a >>depends? More importantly... why is it also still an optdepends? > >I dug around a bit and found this ticket [4]

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/20/17 8:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: On 11/17/2017 07:22 AM, Andrew Crerar wrote: Hi Everyone! My name is Andrew Crerar (aka andrewSC) and I'm applying to become a Trusted User. Big thanks to Johannes Löthberg for being my sponsor! :) At the moment I'm a Research Software Engineer at The

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/21/17 10:25 AM, Jeremy Audet via aur-general wrote: ttf-google-fonts-git: - `install -dm755 ...; install -Dm644 ...;` is kind of like sprinkling your code with `sleep 1` (I think) I understand what you mean, but Andrew might not. To put a finer point on it, `install -dm755` is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

> ttf-google-fonts-git: > - `install -dm755 ...; install -Dm644 ...;` is kind of like sprinkling > your code with `sleep 1` (I think) I understand what you mean, but Andrew might not. To put a finer point on it, `install -dm755` is unnecessary, because install's `-D` flag creates directories

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/20/2017 06:22 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: > I didn’t take a thorough look at the PKGBUILD yet (because I’m currently > lacking free time a lot), but one thing that I’ve already pointed out > for the existing firefox package as well as for the current > firefox-developer package

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

Hi Andrew, Le 17/11/2017 à 13:22, Andrew Crerar a écrit : > Hi Everyone! > > My name is Andrew Crerar (aka andrewSC) and I'm applying to become a Trusted > User. Big thanks to Johannes Löthberg for being my sponsor! :) > > At the moment I'm a Research Software Engineer at The Laboratory for

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 11/17/17 7:47 AM, Evangelos Foutras via aur-general wrote: On 17/11/17 14:22, Andrew Crerar wrote: If I were to become a Trusted User, I would like to move firefox-developer [9] to [community] as well as adopt Evangelos Foutras's [community] packages [10] if he doesn't want to move them to

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

On 17/11/17 14:22, Andrew Crerar wrote: > If I were to become a Trusted User, I would like to move firefox-developer > [9] to [community] as well as adopt Evangelos Foutras's [community] packages > [10] if he doesn't want to move them to [extra]. You told me about this privately on IRC and asked

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

Quoting Andrew Crerar (2017-11-17 13:22:38) > Hi Everyone! > > My name is Andrew Crerar (aka andrewSC) and I'm applying to become a Trusted > User. Big thanks to Johannes Löthberg for being my sponsor! :) > > At the moment I'm a Research Software Engineer at The Laboratory for Analytic >

[aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

Hi Everyone! My name is Andrew Crerar (aka andrewSC) and I'm applying to become a Trusted User. Big thanks to Johannes Löthberg for being my sponsor! :) At the moment I'm a Research Software Engineer at The Laboratory for Analytic Sciences [1] where I primarily write Python 3.x (in combination

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On November 1, 2017 11:17:27 AM GMT+01:00, Eli Schwartz wrote: >On 10/31/2017 03:17 PM, Ray Rashif via aur-general wrote: >> Congratulations, David, you are now an Arch Linux Trusted User! Thanks for... well, the trust I guess! >Congratulations, David! > >As Ray said,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 10/31/2017 03:17 PM, Ray Rashif via aur-general wrote: > Results are in: > > Yes No Abstain Total Participation > 25 68 39 82.98% > > Congratulations, David, you are now an Arch Linux Trusted User! > > What's more: > > - I have updated your account on

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 01:17:40 +0600, Ray Rashif wrote: >Congratulations, David, you are now an Arch Linux Trusted User! Hi, that is good news. Congratulations David :). Regards, Ralf

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 24 October 2017 at 22:54, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em outubro 24, 2017 14:43 Rashif Ray Rahman escreveu: >> >> On 18 October 2017 at 18:40, Rashif Ray Rahman >> wrote: >>> >>> The discussion begins now and will last until 23 October, after

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 10/30/2017 06:20 PM, David Runge wrote: >> But the major thing that I didn't like was the rm -rf in the >> post_remove. I cannot think of a good reason to be doing that, unless >> the application stores user data there, and in that case I don't think >> you should be deleting user data. The

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 2017-10-25 00:08:31 (-0400), Eli Schwartz wrote: > Well, yeah. It's more clear what you're doing. > > FWIW, I typically use a source url like this: > > _file=742770 > source=("${_pkgname}-${pkgver}.xpi::https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/${_file}/;) Hmm, this doesn't seem to

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 10/25/2017 09:16 PM, Ray Rashif via aur-general wrote: > Now, about that automated tool thing: I did a search for 'xxarhtna' in my > archives and got some lines indicating an execution of a script. So, > it was not really out of thin air, but most likely my misinterpration. > It's likely my

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 25 October 2017 at 06:12, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 10/24/2017 12:43 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >> Some issues were raised based on automated tool reports, which I >> think David will be able to resolve. > > Excuse me? I am hardly an "automated tool report". :p You

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 10/24/2017 10:18 PM, David Runge wrote: >> - why is "${source##*/}" obfuscated when it will always be the same >> thing? > I'm not sure I get, what you mean by that. > "${source##*/}" retrieves the .xpi file name from the link stored in > ${source}. I could of course also write >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 2017-10-24 22:43:50 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > I do have one thing to say to David: please do think about the time > commitment associated with this. If you think that you won't be able > to commit much starting out, then it will be quite sad moving forward. I have thought about this a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Hey again, multiple occurences are not quoted again. On 2017-10-22 23:44:39 (-0400), Eli Schwartz wrote: > crypted-backups-git: > - empty variables and arrays are messy Fixed. > - unquoted $pkgdir, though $srcdir is consistently quoted Fixed. > - the pkgver() fallback for non-tagged repos can

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 10/24/2017 12:43 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > Some issues were raised based on automated tool reports, which I > think David will be able to resolve. Excuse me? I am hardly an "automated tool report". :p You seem to have derived that conclusion out of thin air. The reason I never got around

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Em outubro 24, 2017 14:43 Rashif Ray Rahman escreveu: On 18 October 2017 at 18:40, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: The discussion begins now and will last until 23 October, after which the voting period will begin on 24 October. Good luck David! The formal discussion period is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 18 October 2017 at 18:40, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > The discussion begins now and will last until 23 October, after which > the voting period will begin on 24 October. Good luck David! The formal discussion period is over, please cast your votes! The voting period will

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 24 October 2017 at 11:50, Levente Polyak wrote: > At this point my feedback goes to the sponsor instead of the applicant: > > Sorry, but I must say that I really dislike sponsoring a TU applicant without > looking at any PKGBUILD and give some advice. In my world this

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:01:56 +0200, Levente Polyak wrote: >You take the wrong conclusions. Im not saying he may not be suitable >to do the job but I'm saying there is a difference between a random >AUR packager and one that packages for our repositories. The path in >getting the tiny differences

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Hi Eli, thanks for the many remarks. On 2017-10-22 23:44:39 (-0400), Eli Schwartz wrote: > General commentary on your AUR packages, since xxarhtna is being a > slacker who slacks: Due to two work arrangements this week, I won't have time to fix them before this evening. I'll get back to it

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:50:01 +0200, Levente Polyak wrote: >On October 18, 2017 2:40:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >>I confirm my sponsorship. I have to be honest that I have not checked >>David's PKGBUILDs thoroughly, but he has been in contact with me with >>contributions. >> > >At

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On October 18, 2017 2:40:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >I confirm my sponsorship. I have to be honest that I have not checked >David's PKGBUILDs thoroughly, but he has been in contact with me with >contributions. > At this point my feedback goes to the sponsor

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 10/17/2017 07:07 PM, David Runge wrote: > my name is David Runge. You may have come across me somewhere on the > wiki [1], the forums [2] (not so recently), the AUR [3] or the mailing > lists (mainly arch-general). I'm sponsored by Ray Rashif. General commentary on your AUR packages, since

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 18 October 2017 at 05:07, David Runge wrote: > Hi all, > > my name is David Runge. You may have come across me somewhere on the > wiki [1], the forums [2] (not so recently), the AUR [3] or the mailing > lists (mainly arch-general). I'm sponsored by Ray Rashif. I confirm my

[aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Hi all, my name is David Runge. You may have come across me somewhere on the wiki [1], the forums [2] (not so recently), the AUR [3] or the mailing lists (mainly arch-general). I'm sponsored by Ray Rashif. I'm 31, currently live in Berlin and have just finished a Master's degree in audio

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 06:35:44PM +, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-16 10:57:44) > > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-10 15:24:15) > > > I confirm my sponsorship and such. Let the discussion period begin! > > > > > > > Discussion period has

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-16 10:57:44) > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-10 15:24:15) > > I confirm my sponsorship and such. Let the discussion period begin! > > > > Discussion period has ended and the vote is up! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=96 > Vote has closed, and

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 04:37:51PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 09/05/17 at 02:07pm, Morten Linderud wrote: > > Hello Archers and Arch overlords! > > > > # Introduction: > > My name is Morten Linderud, or better known by Foxboron. I'm writing this > > application to join the TU team. My

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On 09/05/17 at 02:07pm, Morten Linderud wrote: > Hello Archers and Arch overlords! > > # Introduction: > My name is Morten Linderud, or better known by Foxboron. I'm writing this > application to join the TU team. My sponsor is Jelle van der Waa. Congrats! The results are: Yes No

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-10 15:24:15) > I confirm my sponsorship and such. Let the discussion period begin! > Discussion period has ended and the vote is up! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=96 -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 PGP Key FP: 5134

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:51:19PM +, Levente Polyak wrote: > On 09/14/2017 03:43 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:01:58PM +, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > >> Hai, > >> > >> On Sunday, 10 September 2017 19:55:16 MSK Eli Schwartz wrote: > >>> python-i3-py: >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:36:20PM +, Levente Polyak wrote: > On 09/10/2017 03:16 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > > User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On 09/14/2017 03:43 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:01:58PM +, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: >> Hai, >> >> On Sunday, 10 September 2017 19:55:16 MSK Eli Schwartz wrote: >>> python-i3-py: >>> - It is probably not important to point out in the description which >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:01:58PM +, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > Hai, > > On Sunday, 10 September 2017 19:55:16 MSK Eli Schwartz wrote: > > python-i3-py: > > - It is probably not important to point out in the description which > > programming language it uses, especially when the pkgname

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On 09/10/2017 03:16 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a focus on > Algebraic Topology. Many thanks to Johannes Löthberg who is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Hai, On Sunday, 10 September 2017 19:55:16 MSK Eli Schwartz wrote: > python-i3-py: > - It is probably not important to point out in the description which > programming language it uses, especially when the pkgname already > includes that info. > - git source at pinned commit should not

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Am 10/09/2017 um 15:25 schrieb Alad Wenter via aur-general: > Sorry, there was a fluke with enigmail that prevented a corrected > signature. This one should however work. > > Alad > > The issue was that I signed both the message and attachment (my public key) in enigmail, and the attachment was

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Am 10/09/2017 um 23:56 schrieb Eli Schwartz: > On 09/10/2017 04:08 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >>> aurutils/aurutils-git: >>> - uses the ISC ("custom:ISC") license, which is not a common license >>> (`pacman -Ql licenses`)and must therefore be installed separately. >>> - Thanks you

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On 09/10/2017 04:08 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> aurutils/aurutils-git: >> - uses the ISC ("custom:ISC") license, which is not a common license >> (`pacman -Ql licenses`)and must therefore be installed separately. >> - Thanks you kindly for upgrading the security of the *sums you

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:55:16PM +, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 09/10/2017 09:16 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > > User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On 09/10/2017 09:16 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a focus on > Algebraic Topology. Many thanks to Johannes Löthberg who is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On 09/10/2017 08:25 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > Sorry, there was a fluke with enigmail that prevented a corrected > signature. This one should however work. > > Alad > > > Am 10/09/2017 um 15:16 schrieb Alad Wenter via aur-general: >> Hello everyone, >> >> My name is Alad Wenter, and

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On 09/10/2017 09:24 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 09/10/17 at 09:19pm, Tom Nguyen via aur-general wrote: >> On 09/10/2017 08:40 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >>> On 09/05/17 at 02:12pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On 09/05/17 at 02:07pm, Morten Linderud wrote: > Hello Archers and Arch

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On 09/10/17 at 09:19pm, Tom Nguyen via aur-general wrote: > On 09/10/2017 08:40 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On 09/05/17 at 02:12pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > >> On 09/05/17 at 02:07pm, Morten Linderud wrote: > >>> Hello Archers and Arch overlords! > >>> > >>> # Introduction: > >>> My name is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On 09/10/2017 08:40 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 09/05/17 at 02:12pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> On 09/05/17 at 02:07pm, Morten Linderud wrote: >>> Hello Archers and Arch overlords! >>> >>> # Introduction: >>> My name is Morten Linderud, or better known by Foxboron. I'm writing this >>>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Morten Linderud

On 09/05/17 at 02:12pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 09/05/17 at 02:07pm, Morten Linderud wrote: > > Hello Archers and Arch overlords! > > > > # Introduction: > > My name is Morten Linderud, or better known by Foxboron. I'm writing this > > application to join the TU team. My sponsor is Jelle

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Sorry, there was a fluke with enigmail that prevented a corrected signature. This one should however work. Alad Am 10/09/2017 um 15:16 schrieb Alad Wenter via aur-general: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > User. I’m a student in

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Quoting Alad Wenter via aur-general (2017-09-10 15:16:57) > Hello everyone, > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a focus on > Algebraic Topology. Many thanks to Johannes Löthberg who is

[aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Hello everyone, My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a focus on Algebraic Topology. Many thanks to Johannes Löthberg who is sponsoring my TU application. I’ve been using Linux since late 2013,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >