[aur-general] [Removal Request] electrum-entropy

2014-02-28 Thread Andy Weidenbaum
I no longer wish to maintain this packagehttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-entropy . Thanks, Andy

[aur-general] [Removal Request] bitcoin-daemon-electrum

2014-02-28 Thread Andy Weidenbaum
This package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-daemon-electrum/has been made obsolete by the new version of electrum-server-git.

Re: [aur-general] removal request: girlfriend

2014-02-24 Thread mail
Can I have it?

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-24 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer project name than package name proposed by the upstream. I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. Excellent

[aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi

2014-02-24 Thread Lucy hi
pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/ I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this package is no longer useful.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi

2014-02-24 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, February 24, 2014 18:01:53 Lucy hi wrote: pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/ I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this package is no longer useful. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-24 Thread carstene1ns
Am 24.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: Status? There still are two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks lwks by stjhimy: + automatic download of source + older + votes - name - maintainers today is two weeks so far lightworks by PyroDevil: + name - needs manual

[aur-general] [Removal Request] nodejs-yapp.js

2014-02-24 Thread Andy Weidenbaum
Upstream source is no longer available. Please remove this packagehttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-yapp.js/ . Thanks, Andy

[aur-general] removal request: girlfriend

2014-02-23 Thread Doug Newgard
Someone uploaded a joke package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/girlfriend/ Doug

[aur-general] Removal request: minetestpp

2014-02-19 Thread Arch Norrepli
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minetestpp/ I created the minetestpp package, but orphaned it after development was given up. Most features of minetestpp have been merged into the current minetest or are availabe through mods. As the repository of minetestpp has been deleted, I request the

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: minetestpp

2014-02-19 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 15:01:41 Arch Norrepli wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minetestpp/ I created the minetestpp package, but orphaned it after development was given up. Most features of minetestpp have been merged into the current minetest or are availabe through mods.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for slic3r-xs-git

2014-02-15 Thread Felix Yan
On Friday, February 14, 2014 22:40:36 Swift Geek wrote: Please remove slic3r-xs-git as it is not needed anymore. I have managed to successfully merge it with slic3r-git PKGBUILD. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slic3r-xs-git Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description:

[aur-general] Removal request for slic3r-xs-git

2014-02-14 Thread Swift Geek
Please remove slic3r-xs-git as it is not needed anymore. I have managed to successfully merge it with slic3r-git PKGBUILD. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slic3r-xs-git

[aur-general] Removal Request - splashtop

2014-02-12 Thread Mark Weiman
It seems that the package splashtop was replaced by the splashtop-client and splashtop-streamer packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/splashtop/ Mark

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - splashtop

2014-02-12 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Mark Weiman mark.wei...@markzz.comwrote: It seems that the package splashtop was replaced by the splashtop-client and splashtop-streamer packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/splashtop/ Mark Merged into splashtop-streamer. Thx. -- Maxime

[aur-general] Removal request - hddb

2014-02-11 Thread Louis-Guillaume Gagnon
Greetings! Please delete AUR package 'hddb' - upstream is gone. glg

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - hddb

2014-02-11 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 21:32:40 Louis-Guillaume Gagnon wrote: Greetings! Please delete AUR package 'hddb' - upstream is gone. glg Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Removal request mkzipbomb

2014-02-08 Thread Rikard Falkeborn
Please remove the package mkzipbomb [1]. The package is empty and the former maintainer has asked it to be removed in the comments of the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mkzipbomb/ Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Removal request mkzipbomb

2014-02-08 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 09/02/2014 00:06, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: Please remove the package mkzipbomb [1]. The package is empty and the former maintainer has asked it to be removed in the comments of the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mkzipbomb/ Thanks Done. Thanks. -- Sébastien Seblu

[aur-general] Removal request firefox-extention-kwallet-svn

2014-02-07 Thread Joris Steyn
I submitted a package with a typo in the name. I submitted it again with the correct name. Could you remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-extention-kwallet-svn Thanks! Joris.

[aur-general] Removal request - bitcoind

2014-02-05 Thread WorMzy Tykashi
Hi, Please remove bitcoind [1], it is provided by community/bitcoin-daemon. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoind/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - bitcoind

2014-02-05 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 23:40:14 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: Please remove bitcoind [1], it is provided by community/bitcoin-daemon. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc

[aur-general] Removal request

2014-02-04 Thread Daniel Landau
Hi, The package [1] is outdated, an orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. Daniel Landau [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-heal-selection [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2014-02-04 Thread Martin Wimpress
Hi, On 04/02/14 16:22, Daniel Landau wrote: Hi, The package [1] is outdated, an orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. Daniel Landau [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-heal-selection [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/

[aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Pyro Devil
Hi! I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Thanks! Pyro Devil

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Nowaker
I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to remove

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote: I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Actually,

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Sam Stuewe
On 2014-02-03 07:51, Nowaker wrote: I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to remove lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks. Actually, though the

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Jeremy Audet
The lwks package includes the word Lightworks in the description, which means it can be found easily. Also, the lwks package has 21 votes to lightworks 0. That said, I have no personal experience with lightworks or how other distributions treat the package, so I have no solid opinion on the

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: The lwks package includes the word Lightworks in the description, which means it can be found easily. You're right, even though I prefer 'lightworks' :-) Also, the lwks package has 21 votes to lightworks 0.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Nowaker
Actually, though the project name is lightworks, the packages distributed upstream are all named lwks. I feel like, keeping in line with upstream's naming convention, it makes sense to keep the name lwks. The lwks package includes the word Lightworks in the description, which means it can be

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-02-03 Thread Sam Stuewe
On 2014-02-03 16:11, Nowaker wrote: Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer project name than package name proposed by the upstream. I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how

[aur-general] Removal request: udis86-bin

2014-02-02 Thread
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udis86-bin/ This orphan package is obsoleted by udis86 and udis86-git. It hasn't been updated since 2011. Please consider deleting it.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: udis86-bin

2014-02-02 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:31 AM, 483...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udis86-bin/ This orphan package is obsoleted by udis86 and udis86-git. It hasn't been updated since 2011. Please consider deleting it. Deleted, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fail2ban-systemd-journal-git

2014-01-30 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:46 AM, William J. Bowman bluephoeni...@gmail.comwrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-systemd-journal-git/ has been superseded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-0.9dev/ -- William J. Bowman Northeastern University College of Computer and

[aur-general] Removal request: octave-java

2014-01-30 Thread Clemens Buchacher
I am the maintainer of the octave-java package [1]. It is now included in octave since version 3.8 and has been deprecated by the developers. Please remove. [#octave] 20:10 drizzd With Octave 3.8 the java package now shadows a lot of core library functions. Are the functions now

[aur-general] Removal request: octave-ident

2014-01-30 Thread Clemens Buchacher
I am not the maintainer of the octave-ident package [1]. But the maintainer notes in the comments that it has been removed and merged into the control package. I confirm that it has been removed upstream [2]. Please remove. Thanks, Clemens [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/octave-ident/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: octave-ident

2014-01-30 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Thursday 30 January 2014 20:23:40 Clemens Buchacher wrote: I am not the maintainer of the octave-ident package [1]. But the maintainer notes in the comments that it has been removed and merged into the control package. I confirm that it has been removed upstream [2]. Please remove. Both

[aur-general] Removal request: ds4drv-hidraw-git

2014-01-29 Thread Lauri Niskanen
Hello, ds4drv-hidraw-git was a package for an experimental feature of ds4drv. That feature is now merged to the master branch and is available with ds4drv-git. ds4drv-hidraw-git should be removed from AUR. Thanks. -- Ape Lauri Niskanen

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: ds4drv-hidraw-git

2014-01-29 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:24:57 Lauri Niskanen wrote: ds4drv-hidraw-git was a package for an experimental feature of ds4drv. That feature is now merged to the master branch and is available with ds4drv-git. ds4drv-hidraw-git should be removed from AUR. Ds4drv-hidraw-git had been

Re: [aur-general] removal request: exfat

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Micay
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak m...@ava1ar.info wrote: exfat package was a first package for exfat kernel module, based on opened by samsung code. Currently it is outdated and not compatible with latest kernels. exfat-git is a replacement package, which is being

[aur-general] Removal request: fail2ban-systemd-journal-git

2014-01-29 Thread William J. Bowman
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-systemd-journal-git/ has been superseded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-0.9dev/ -- William J. Bowman Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[aur-general] Removal request: dktools-gui

2014-01-24 Thread Ansgar Taflinski
Hallo, please remove the package dktools-gui. GUI components for dktools are included in the dktools package since version 3.0, so the old dktools-gui package is obsolete. I am the owner of the package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dktools-gui Thanks, Ansgar

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: dktools-gui

2014-01-24 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ansgar Taflinski ataflin...@uni-koblenz.de wrote: Hallo, please remove the package dktools-gui. GUI components for dktools are included in the dktools package since version 3.0, so the old dktools-gui package is obsolete. I am the owner of the package.

[aur-general] Removal request: mixcloud-dl

2014-01-22 Thread Jordi De Groof
Hi, Please remove mixcloud-dl [1], the program is no longer functioning. I'm the maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mixcloud-dl/ Regards, Jordi De Groof

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: mixcloud-dl

2014-01-22 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:01:52 Jordi De Groof wrote: Hi, Please remove mixcloud-dl [1], the program is no longer functioning. I'm the maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mixcloud-dl/ Regards, Jordi De Groof Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of linux-elantech-trackpoint

2014-01-11 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Saturday 11 January 2014 17:26:27 Faule Socke wrote: Reason: My other package elantech-tp-dkms does the same but using dkms instead of patching the kernel which should be much more useful. Url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-elantech-trackpoint/ Regards Removed, thank you. --

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of ttf-font-ionicons-space

2014-01-10 Thread Felix Yan
On Friday, January 10, 2014 14:44:43 Carlos Pita wrote: Reason: my other package ttf-font-icons do the same and more. URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-font-ionicons-space/ Regards -- Carlos Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

[aur-general] Removal request: pathvisio-devel, toshiba-pmfix-hg

2014-01-04 Thread Michael Schubert
Dear TUs, Please remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pathvisio-devel/ reason: 3.x is now stable https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toshiba-pmfix-hg/ reason: fixes included in mainline kernel I am the maintainer of both packages. Thank you Michael

[aur-general] Removal request: python2-hush, python2-hush-git, python2-mpltools

2014-01-03 Thread Rasmus
Hi, Please remove the following obsolete packages - python2-hush: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-hush/ - python2-hush-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-hush-git/ - python2-mpltools https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-mpltools/ They all

[aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages

2014-01-02 Thread Timothée Ravier
Hi, Some weeks ago, I renamed most SELinux related packages in the AUR following this convention : * selinux-pam - pam-selinux : -selinux suffix for packages which are official Arch packages with SELinux specific changes ; * selinux-usr-libselinux - libselinux : no suffix for packages purely

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages

2014-01-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote: Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-findutils/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages

2014-01-02 Thread Timothée Ravier
On 02/01/2014 22:54, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote: Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/

[aur-general] Removal request: hawaii-fluid-git and hawaii-greenisland-git

2013-12-31 Thread Pier Luigi
Hi, Could you please remove the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-greenisland-git/ They were respectively renamed to `fluid-git' and `greenisland-git'. Cheers. -- Out of the box experience

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: hawaii-fluid-git and hawaii-greenisland-git

2013-12-31 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 12:58:40 Pier Luigi wrote: Hi, Could you please remove the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-greenisland-git/ They were respectively renamed to `fluid-git' and

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - h2status

2013-12-25 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:45:33 Carlos Pita wrote: Hi, could you remove the h2status package? It's a tiny development of mine that is better distributed under h2status-git. It was quietly announced yesterday and the expected user base is infinitesimal so probably there is no one but

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - h2status

2013-12-25 Thread Carlos Pita
Thank you and sorry, I'm a first-timer. Regards, Carlos. On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:45:33 Carlos Pita wrote: Hi, could you remove the h2status package? It's a tiny development of mine that is better distributed

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-12-19 Thread Slavi Pantaleev
Hi. This is about my libcvp11 package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcvp11/ The binary blob source files now 404 and are nowhere to be found online. I no longer have a use for this package, as opensc from [community] seems to provide a working free-software alternative. I still have a

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-12-19 Thread Felix Yan
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 19:45:16 Slavi Pantaleev wrote: Hi. This is about my libcvp11 package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcvp11/ The binary blob source files now 404 and are nowhere to be found online. I no longer have a use for this package, as opensc from [community]

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-12-18 Thread Daniel Murphy
Greetings, I managed the package linux-xps15z several months back. This package added a trackpad driver needed for certain laptops. The driver was merged into the 3.9 series kernel and has been working fine since; therefore the AUR package will no longer be maintained and can be deleted if you

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-12-18 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 22:15:08 Daniel Murphy wrote: Greetings, I managed the package linux-xps15z several months back. This package added a trackpad driver needed for certain laptops. The driver was merged into the 3.9 series kernel and has been working fine since; therefore the AUR

[aur-general] Removal request: owl-git

2013-12-16 Thread Bastien Dejean
Please remove the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owl-git/ It was renamed to `owlman-git`. Greetings, -- b.d (| |) ^ ^

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: owl-git

2013-12-16 Thread Xyne
On 2013-12-16 18:10 +0100 Bastien Dejean wrote: Please remove the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owl-git/ It was renamed to `owlman-git`. Greetings, -- b.d (| |) ^ ^ rotated for science (merged in layman's terms)

[aur-general] Removal request for [linux-xen].

2013-12-13 Thread Evan Teitelman
Please remove linux-xen[1]. Xen support is enabled in core/x86_64/linux. Since Xen support is disabled in core/i686/linux due to its PAE dependency[2], Xen support was enabled in linux-pae[3]. The linux-xen packages is out-dated and no longer necessary. [1]

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for [linux-xen].

2013-12-13 Thread Felix Yan
On Friday, December 13, 2013 11:42:28 Evan Teitelman wrote: Please remove linux-xen[1]. Xen support is enabled in core/x86_64/linux. Since Xen support is disabled in core/i686/linux due to its PAE dependency[2], Xen support was enabled in linux-pae[3]. The linux-xen packages is out-dated and

[aur-general] Removal request: fusion-icon-fixed

2013-12-02 Thread Pantelis Panayiotou
Please remove fusion-icon-fixed, as it has been merged with fusion-icon. (This is the second time I'm requesting this. I never got a reply to my first email.) Thank you. -- Pantelis Panayiotou - p.panayio...@gmail.com This email is signed with an S/MIME digital signature, using a

[aur-general] removal request for rt-tests-git

2013-12-01 Thread Joakim Hernberg
rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem getting the tarballs. No need to merge into rt-tests. Thanks in advance, -- Joakim

Re: [aur-general] removal request for rt-tests-git

2013-12-01 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 2 December 2013 00:31, Joakim Hernberg j...@alchemy.lu wrote: rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem getting the tarballs.

[aur-general] Removal request for f2fs packages

2013-11-30 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
There are still a couple f2fs packages in the AUR. Since f2fs is now included in the mainline kernel, I don't think that these are necessary anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-f2fs/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-f2fs/ Thanks! -- Curtis Shimamoto sugar.and.scruffy

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for f2fs packages

2013-11-30 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 30/11/2013 23:06, Curtis Shimamoto wrote: There are still a couple f2fs packages in the AUR. Since f2fs is now included in the mainline kernel, I don't think that these are necessary anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-f2fs/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-f2fs/

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2013-11-26 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Dustin Falgout dus...@falgout.us wrote: Hi, The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative

[aur-general] Removal Request: dswitcher

2013-11-25 Thread tuftedocelot
Hi, Please remove dswitcher[1]. I realized it would be better served with a -git package and so I have created a new dswitcher-git package. dswitcher is no longer necessary. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dswitcher/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: Consort Desktop packages

2013-11-25 Thread Felix Yan
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 19:39:27 Marco Scarpetta wrote: I think the following packages should be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/athena-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-panel-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-session-git/

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: dswitcher

2013-11-25 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, November 25, 2013 11:08:07 tuftedocelot wrote: Hi, Please remove dswitcher[1]. I realized it would be better served with a -git package and so I have created a new dswitcher-git package. dswitcher is no longer necessary. Thanks [1]

[aur-general] Removal request: Consort Desktop packages

2013-11-23 Thread Marco Scarpetta
I think the following packages should be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/athena-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-panel-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-session-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consortium-git/ The project is no more developed and

[aur-general] Removal Request

2013-11-18 Thread Dustin Falgout
Hi, The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative available in the AUR that has active development. (grub2-editor[3]) For that

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-11-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git-simply/ There already is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git/ , as mentioned in io-git-simply's description. This package doesn't build because the PKGBUILD doesn't list dependencies and makedependencies. It's in 'emulators' category for some

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-11-16 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 16/11/2013 19:17, Karol Blazewicz wrote: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git-simply/ There already is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git/ , as mentioned in io-git-simply's description. This package doesn't build because the PKGBUILD doesn't list dependencies and

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: Texmaker-qt5 kbibtex-kde4-svn

2013-11-10 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Removed texmaker-qt5 and merged+removed kbibtex-kde4-svn with kbibtex-svn. Thanks. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

[aur-general] Removal Request: Texmaker-qt5 kbibtex-kde4-svn

2013-11-09 Thread glorfindel
Hello, I request the removal of two packages: ** Texmaker-qt5: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texmaker-qt5/ I proposed this package, but it's no longer useful since Community Repo provides a version which uses now qt5. ** kbibtex-kde4-svn:

[aur-general] Removal request: eclipse-knime

2013-10-28 Thread Fabien Dubosson
Hello, The package eclipse-knime is orphan, outdated from 5 months and its name is not explicit. The package kime-sdk replaces it from several months. Could you remove it for clarity? Best regards, Fabien Dubosson

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: eclipse-knime

2013-10-28 Thread Xyne
Fabien Dubosson wrote: Hello, The package eclipse-knime is orphan, outdated from 5 months and its name is not explicit. The package kime-sdk replaces it from several months. Could you remove it for clarity? Best regards, Fabien Dubosson Done, thanks. Please provide links and check your

[aur-general] Removal request: xorriso , xorriso-tcltk

2013-10-23 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, please remove AUR packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/ Both are outdated, overlapping with Archlinux package libisoburn, and already have been orphaned more than a month ago. Andreas Radke reports in

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: xorriso , xorriso-tcltk

2013-10-23 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 10/23/2013 07:16 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, please remove AUR packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/ Both are outdated, overlapping with Archlinux package libisoburn, and already have been orphaned more than a month

[aur-general] Removal Request

2013-10-18 Thread Dustin Falgout
Hi, I noticed that thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git^[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git/ is a duplicate of thunderbird-gnome-keyring-git^[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-gnome-keyring/ . It has already been disowned so could

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2013-10-18 Thread Felix Yan
On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:25:48 Dustin Falgout wrote: Hi, I noticed that thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git^[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git/ is a duplicate of thunderbird-gnome-keyring-git^[2]

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: funcy-git

2013-10-17 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Tue 15 Oct 2013 at 12:11, Martti Kühne wrote: I failed at getting the package I made yesterday right. Please remove the old [0], as I'm preserving the comment here and there are no votes, either. New and corrected package is in [1]. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/funcy-git/

[aur-general] Removal request: funcy-git

2013-10-15 Thread Martti Kühne
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:37:48AM +, aur-not...@archlinux.org wrote: from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/funcy-git/ Scimmia wrote: You might want to mention that the tools are for python. I assume python is a dep, then? A makedep at the very least. You're cloning everything out

[aur-general] Removal Request: gogglesmm-hg

2013-10-02 Thread Sander Jansen
Please remove gogglesmm-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gogglesmm-hg/). It has been replaced by gogglesmm-git. Thanks, Sander

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: gogglesmm-hg

2013-10-02 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove gogglesmm-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gogglesmm-hg/). It has been replaced by gogglesmm-git. Done. Thanks. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-09-29 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Sun 29 Sep 2013 at 04:27, lukpod wrote: Remove smokinguns-custom_mappack1[1]. The source of this package is not available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smokinguns-custom_mappack1 Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpKixyh2Ox9s.pgp Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Removal request: vlc-vlsub

2013-09-29 Thread Krzysztof AS
Hi there, vlc-vlsub - already included as a part of vlc package by vlc devs (sorry) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-vlsub/ Have a nice day.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: vlc-vlsub

2013-09-29 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, September 29, 2013 10:52:54 Krzysztof AS wrote: Hi there, vlc-vlsub - already included as a part of vlc package by vlc devs (sorry) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-vlsub/ Have a nice day. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-09-28 Thread lukpod
Remove smokinguns-custom_mappack1[1]. The source of this package is not available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smokinguns-custom_mappack1

[aur-general] Removal request: python-xlrd3

2013-09-25 Thread Aaron DeVore
xlrd3 was a third party effort to port xlrd to Python 3. The fork was never complete, xlrd now has full Python 3 support, and the package is orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-xlrd3/ -Aaron DeVore

[aur-general] Removal request : catalyst-131-dkms

2013-09-24 Thread yadieet still alive
Hi, Please remove : - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst-131-dkms/ Actually this package is 'catalyst 13.1 non-legacy for linux kernel = 3.10 (support xorg-server 1.13)'. But for some reason, I've changed this package and I decided to cancel this package. So, this package is useless.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request : catalyst-131-dkms

2013-09-24 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 01:52:06 yadieet still alive wrote: Hi, Please remove : - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst-131-dkms/ Actually this package is 'catalyst 13.1 non-legacy for linux kernel = 3.10 (support xorg-server 1.13)'. But for some reason, I've changed this

[aur-general] Removal request: xf86-video-intel-plymouth

2013-09-23 Thread Ivan Shapovalov
Hi, Please, remove xf86-video-intel-plymouth[1] package for its patches are now unneeded for Plymouth to work (checked with gen4 and gen7) and obsolete (the DDX's code has changed too much). [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-plymouth/ Thanks, -- Ivan Shapovalov /

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: xf86-video-intel-plymouth

2013-09-23 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, September 23, 2013 20:40:06 Ivan Shapovalov wrote: Hi, Please, remove xf86-video-intel-plymouth[1] package for its patches are now unneeded for Plymouth to work (checked with gen4 and gen7) and obsolete (the DDX's code has changed too much). [1]:

[aur-general] Removal request: oss-hg

2013-09-21 Thread Nowaker
Hi, I'd like oss-hg package removed from AUR. OSS does not use Mercurial for development now, so the name is out of date. Besides, the package didn't contain systemd units. Today I uploaded oss-git which is almost a 1:1 copy of oss from [community]. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >