On 24/07/12 07:00AM, Chris Speck wrote:
> Hello,
Hey Chris,
do you still suffer from the issue you have described in your initial
mail?
> I know that my ssh keys and setup are working because it used to
> function with the AUR and I continue to use it every hour of the day
> at work.
>
> Any
On 24/07/08 11:25PM, james smith wrote:
> A request for the pkgbuild to be updated[1] [2] quickly degenerated in
> insults
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunshine?O=10#comment-981082
> [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunshine?O=10#comment-981374
Hey james,
thanks for bringing
On 24/05/20 11:46AM, Giovanni Harting wrote:
> Hey everyone.
Hey Giovanni
> I'm hereby applying as a package maintainer,
> which is kindly sponsored by David (dvzrv) and Jelle (jelly) and formally by
> Levente (anthraxx), for whom Jelle has taken over the sponsorship.
Thanks for applying and
My
> > > application is sponsored by Christian Heusel (gromit) and Jakub
> > > Klinkovský (lahwaacz).
> >
> >
> > This therefore marks the beginning of the discussion period which will
> > last for 2 weeks until 2024-05-19 after which we will have
On 5/25/24 2:19 PM, Fabio Loli wrote:
A request for help quickly degenerated in several insults
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/octopi#comment-974574
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/octopi#comment-974594
Please take appropriate action
Hey Fabio,
thanks for the heads-up, I have dealt
On 24/02/05 03:47AM, Zehka wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hello!
> Today i noticed by chance that the aur/tor-browser package is gone and
> replaced by extra/torbrowser-launcher
The aur/tor-browser package on the aur was merged[0] into
aur/tor-browser-bin and was not replaced by
On 23/09/02 01:24AM, Christian Heusel wrote:
> On 8/28/23 21:01, Christian Heusel wrote:
> > On 8/24/23 13:08, Christian Heusel wrote:
> > > On 23/08/24 01:33AM, Christian Heusel wrote:
> > > > Most of our worflows have moved from mailing lists and patches to me
On 8/28/23 21:01, Christian Heusel wrote:
On 8/24/23 13:08, Christian Heusel wrote:
On 23/08/24 01:33AM, Christian Heusel wrote:
Most of our worflows have moved from mailing lists and patches to merge
requests on gitlab. Until now amending the TU Bylaws formally requires
sending patches via
On 8/24/23 13:08, Christian Heusel wrote:
On 23/08/24 01:33AM, Christian Heusel wrote:
Most of our worflows have moved from mailing lists and patches to merge
requests on gitlab. Until now amending the TU Bylaws formally requires
sending patches via mail which this amendment intends to replace
On 23/08/24 01:33AM, Christian Heusel wrote:
> Most of our worflows have moved from mailing lists and patches to merge
> requests on gitlab. Until now amending the TU Bylaws formally requires
> sending patches via mail which this amendment intends to replace with
> merge requests o
Most of our worflows have moved from mailing lists and patches to merge
requests on gitlab. Until now amending the TU Bylaws formally requires
sending patches via mail which this amendment intends to replace with
merge requests on the gitlab repository.
Signed-off-by: Christian Heusel
---
tu
Excerpts from Fabian Bornscheins mail at 23/08/11 10:04AM:
> Hey everyone!
Hey Fabian!
> Now that I'm back on Arch, I do help people on various platforms, such
> as Fedi/Mastodon, Matrix, and Telegram. You can find me using my
> 'fabiscafe' alias.
I think I have also seen some helpful comments
Hello tallero,
I think Antiz explained in his answer pretty nicely what was done why, please
re-read the mail if you want to understand why the Merge Request to vte-git was
rejected (for technical reasons) and why the behaviour of you and xiota is not
acceptable.
Considering the current state
Hey Ross!
> Hey and hello, new here, and am wondering how to submit a patch to a
> file... specifically the PKGBUILD for the package pissircd-git -- I've been
> copying my own PKGBUILD file over during the generation of a package build
> to avoid having it try to create a socket file in my home
Hey Iyán,
> I think the issue is that in the past I commited a large patch file (by
> mistake) instead of including the url in the sources array (that's commit
> ef079835), and somehow the remote didn't complain back then but it does now.
>
> I have removed that patch and replace it with the
Hey Christian ;)
> I took over the package blink1. It is not a -git package so it should
> have a stable checksum, in my opinion. But since the project it builds
> uses a submodule, the package uses source=("git+https:/…) and SKIP for
> the checksum. This way prepare() can do a submodule init and
On 23/05/04 08:07PM, é wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm attempting to update https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cpuset, and
> cloning it works fine, however trying to commit and push changes results in
> the following error (snipped):
>
> ```
> Total 5 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
>
h an underscore also applicable for .install files?
> kopia:
> - we have tests, lets use them
Yes some of these currently seem to fail, that's why I put this change
on hold while I investigate whats going wrong there. Maybe this is a bug
I have to fix in packaging kopia or these are issues ups
On 4/9/23 23:39, Brett Cornwall wrote:
Hi, Chris!
Hey Brett!
I like the dedication to keeping packages managed rather than just
bringing in a whole bunch of new packages. :)
As time goes on I'll probably find some more software that could be
brought to the official repos, but the status quo
ing until here!
Christian "gromit" Heusel
[0] https://github.com/christian-heusel
[1] https://www.noname-ev.de/howtotreff.html
[2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/30483
[3] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/gromit
[4] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gromit
[5] https://wiki.archlinux.org/tit
20 matches
Mail list logo
