People people.
I have to admit I am a little ... concerned by any committee wanting to
extend maximum term of office.
Robert makes a few good points I think:
* Better communication from the GFA is essential. I can't remember when the
last time I got an official communication from the GFA except
Oh dear.
Nobody respects those who stoop to personal attacks Mike. Maybe you need some
counselling for that anger.
No hard feelings,
Richard
--- On Fri, 24/4/09, Mike Borgelt wrote:
> From: Mike Borgelt
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] GFA Board members: TERM OF OFFICE - proposed
> change to
> Your tiny brain might like to contemplate the growth and success of other
> branches of sport aviation since 1984. A goodly part of that can be ascribed
> to getting regulation off people's backs.
>
> My "problem" with the GFA is that it wants to be a monopoly and write and
> enforce the rules fo
A quick drive by shooting followed by unwillingness to discuss the
issues raised. Class act, Richard.
Your tiny brain might like to contemplate the growth and success of
other branches of sport aviation since 1984. A goodly part of that
can be ascribed to getting regulation off people's backs.
At 03:00 PM 24/04/2009, you wrote:
So you HAVE been wrong before Mike?!!
PS: FV [the oldest in Australia] soon off to a new home.
Tom
62 times is the lower bound (the number of for real outlandings in
paddocks) and lots of other times about lots of things, Tom.
Mike
Borgelt Instruments
