Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:54:22 +1000
At 05:22 PM 1/02/2007, you wrote:
Mike Wrote:
Well don't keep us all in suspense. What was it?
Which ever glider is not booked at the club (since they are all Flarm
equiped)
Chad Nowak
The serious situation
At 09:18 PM 1/02/2007, you wrote:
To put it simply, it sounds similar to the incident at Benalla. I
had someone to my left and behind at about the same altitude. Even
though the red light would have been on I don't remember seeing
it. I guess I had my eye's outside of the cockpit. Anyway I
Mike,
TCAS is actually incapable of causing an accident. Pilots do that !
However, incorrect use of TCAS can cause an accident.
TCAS requires BOTH pilots to do what TCAS directs for the desired outcome to
be provided. If ONE does something different, then an accident can (AND HAS)
occur.
I'm
-To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in
Australia.aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in
Australia.aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:57:20 +1000
At 09:18 PM 1/02/2007, you
: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of issues relating to Soaring
in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
This started as a comment about wider applicability of the technology
to the wider GA community.
AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED the flarm units
that if you want a little bit of extra signal
the buy a external antenna...same applies to GPS's or VHF's
Nigel keep up the R+D work.
Regards
Ben
- Original Message -
From: nandrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
What are you going on about Mike? No one said
],Discussion of issues relating
to Soaring in Australia.aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:03:06 +0900
The same could be said for a handheld gps mounted on your leg plenty of
shielding from the Aircraft , depending on the position
At 08:35 PM 31/01/2007, you wrote:
Being one that has had Flarm alert me to a serious situtation before
I'd like to say thankyou to you Nigel for putting up with all you do
and making this not only avalible to us but also continuing to build
and improve the product. Keep it up and I'm sure
At 06:06 PM 31/01/2007, you wrote:
I have not read the German incident but I am sure we will see others and
possibly in Australia we might have a collision between 2 flarm equipped
aircraft - I hope not - the technology does not guarantee safety - we all
know that but I have equally many
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in
Australia.aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:47:37 +1000
At 08:35 PM 31/01/2007, you wrote:
Being one that has had Flarm alert me to a serious situtation before I'd
like to say
What are you going on about Mike? No one said the existing antenna was not
working and it is fine for most installations out of the box which is what
we have used for the last 14 months. In some cases Carbon fibre fuses can
block SOME of the signal, not all of it AND in some cases cross
This started as a comment about wider applicability of the technology
to the wider GA community.
AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED the flarm units are not that suitable due to
reduced range and airframe shielding issues which Nigel himself
mentioned in a private email to me as a result of an earlier
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Borgelt
Sent: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of issues relating to Soaring
in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] .Flarm antenna
This started as a comment about wider
13 matches
Mail list logo
