Hi Mandy,
Many thanks for your input re how to link up with the current state of play.
I don't recall the exact details, but a few years ago, I do recall that for
Bruce Taylor, the penny dropped, and he stated that (from hard learned
experience), he was not from that point on, prepared to fly in c
Bernard I personally don't have a problem with you promoting your product here
but we don't need the "Yesterday I was asked to translate the report on the 20m
Multi-seat clas" excuse to do so.
Rob Izatt
On 10/07/2014, at 2:02 AM, Future Aviation wrote:
> Good morning all
>
> Yesterday I was
I've looked pretty hard; but can't seem to find the comp report on the
website... any hints on where to find it please? Apologies if I am missing
something!
Thanks,
Caleb
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Robert Izatt
wrote:
> Bernard I personally don't have a problem with you promoting your pr
>>Bernard I personally don't have a problem with you promoting your product here
And surely if it is not a promotion, it would be correct to mention
the complete domination of the 20M class by Arcus gliders except for
this lone ASG 32 and a DG-1000M?
D
On Jul 10, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Robert Izatt wrote:
> Bernard I personally don't have a problem with you promoting your product
> here but we don't need the "Yesterday I was asked to translate the report on
> the 20m Multi-seat clas" excuse to do so.
> Rob Izatt
We’ve had this discussion before
of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] World comps in Finland
>>Bernard I personally don't have a problem with you promoting your product
here
And surely if it is not a promotion, it would be correct to mention
the complete domination of the 20M cla
al Message-
From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of DMcD
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:40 AM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] World comps in Finland
>>Bernard I perso
>> unlike the grotesque Arcus
Well it's difficult to see in the pic, but I guess that the ASG-32 is
entirely devoid of those terrible speed robbing bumps.
Still, they don't seem to rob that much speed.
D
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.i
Sadly, whilst it was great to see a new glider on the air, nothing can be taken
from the comp in terms of potential performance. The 20m class had far more to
do with the pilots than the gliders. The Jones brothers would still have won
flying a DG505!
I got to see it close up for a short period
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrDLQ61474
Standard class definitely seems to be better at high speed.
750kg AUW in 20m class probably doesn't help them either, or at least not
with 16sqm of wing.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Matt Gage
wrote:
> Sadly, whilst it was great to see a new glid
Perhaps you should all wait for the new HpH TwinShark from HpH. First flight in
the next 12 months. Available as pure glider/ Jet Sustainer and BinderSolo
powered self launcher.
http://hphuk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TwinShark_20m_p4.pdf
A new self-launching Shark 304MS will be delivered t
any time soon. Bernard Eckey will have another excellent
glider to market. He may need it when the latest Ventus is released,
Harry Medlicott
From: Robert Izatt
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 8:45 AM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] World comps
-soaring] World comps in Finland
Perhaps you should all wait for the new HpH TwinShark from HpH. First flight
in the next 12 months. Available as pure glider/ Jet Sustainer and
BinderSolo powered self launcher.
http://hphuk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TwinShark_20m_p4.pdf
A new self
Is the wing area wrong in that document or the polar? Because
800kg/15.38sqm (52kg/sqm) does not match the 800kg @ 46kg/sqm on the polar.
On 11 Jul 2014 08:42, "Robert Izatt" wrote:
> Perhaps you should all wait for the new HpH TwinShark from HpH. First
> flight in the next 12 months. Available a
Thanks for that Matthew. The 52 is correct. I will advise the factory about the
polar/weight number on the brochure.
Cheers
Rob
On 11/07/2014, at 11:46 AM, Matthew Scutter wrote:
> Is the wing area wrong in that document or the polar? Because 800kg/15.38sqm
> (52kg/sqm) does not match the 800k
de.on.net
> [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Robert Izatt
> Sent: Friday, 11 July 2014 8:45 AM
> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] World comps in Finland
>
> Perhaps you should all wait for the
16 matches
Mail list logo
