m Time
http://www.uniformtime.com.au
PO Box 114 INDOOROOPILLY QLD 4068
Ph: 07 3371 2944 Fax: 07 3870 4103
- Original Message -
From: "Dav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
> Ah so av
-Original Message-
From: Dav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 21 June 2002 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
>>Out of interest is there anyone on this site who does not already possess a
>ppl
>>who agrees with th
requirment.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
> I could give many examples, Dav, but they are unrelated to the Departments
> involved
ncepts
Uniform Time
http://www.uniformtime.com.au
PO Box 114 INDOOROOPILLY QLD 4068
Ph: 07 3371 2944 Fax: 07 3870 4103
- Original Message -
From: "Dav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What
an Einstein for that either does it?
Dav
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
> Dave Lawley said:
>
> Snip
>
> >L
Dave Lawley said:
Snip
>Let me relate a typical example of the kind of disadvantages that can
occour when I >deal with government departments"
Strange isn't it that some people always seem to get poor responses from
Government Departments, while others always seem to get perfectly reasonable
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
> > Absolutely none of the perceived advantages exist,
>
>
> Why is it that the pro-argument uses worked examples and reason and
> logic to justify t
>
>
>Back on May 2 on the GFA web site under "what's new", this matter was
>reasonably explained for members to consider.
>
In a word format document, which I can't read! Public domain formats please!
(Did I tell you guys already how much I hate M$? Oh I did huh? oh well
save that
rant for some
ormtime.com.au
PO Box 114 INDOOROOPILLY QLD 4068
Ph: 07 3371 2944 Fax: 07 3870 4103
- Original Message -
From: "Maurice Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
>
Derek Ruddock wrote:
>Not quite, it's one of the *ratings* they will be able to apply for. (picky picky 8)
>)
>
>
h, I hate that ;-)
--
* You are subscribed to the aus-soaring mailing list.
* To Unsubscribe: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* with "unsubscribe aus-soaring" in
Not quite, it's one of the *ratings* they will be able to apply for. (picky picky 8) )
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/06/02 11:18:53 >>>
...
It's worth noting that, as well as the introduction of the RPL, the PPL
will be changed such
that pilots who hold a PPL will be able to get endorsements to fly
I agree with Ken that many benefits would accrue from having an Australian
Gliding License.
To have a very positive and identifiable goal beyond first solo would
provide excellent motivation for many students. Motivation that is at
present obscured by a vague series of "mini goals" like completi
Back on May 2 on the GFA web site under "what's new", this matter was
reasonably explained for members to consider. Some time before this round
of debate. I do not find that much of the argument being put in this forum
offers much light or refutes satisfactorily the position the GFA is taking.
> Absolutely none of the perceived advantages exist,
Why is it that the pro-argument uses worked examples and reason and
logic to justify their
position but those against just use FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt).
If there are genuine reasons why we shouldn't become licenced then let's
hear
In a message dated 6/6/02 7:18:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< a hell of a lot of disadvantages will become apparent only
after that dreaded piece of paper is in force. >>
Like what? Specifics please, not vague allegations. We get too many of those
in this forum.
--
* You are subscribe
Rolf
This statement tells us nothing. Please elaborate with some facts so we can
make an informed judgement,
- Original Message -
From: "rolf a. buelter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soa
, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] What's in a name?
| Very few of the contributors to this thread know the
ramifications a
| "license" will have longer term. I do, because 2/3rds of
my gliding life I
| have been a licensed glider pilot. Absolutely none of the
perceived
| adv
Very few of the contributors to this thread know the ramifications a
"license" will have longer term. I do, because 2/3rds of my gliding life I
have been a licensed glider pilot. Absolutely none of the perceived
advantages exist, a hell of a lot of disadvantages will become apparent only
after
18 matches
Mail list logo