Scott,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Scott wrote:
> You know, I've often wondered about these large companies - what would stop
> them from presenting a page that said "Your access to our services has been
> restricted because of laws in your jurisdiction. If you have any questions,
> please c
You know, I've often wondered about these large companies - what would stop
them from presenting a page that said "Your access to our services has been
restricted because of laws in your jurisdiction. If you have any questions,
please call on to discuss the issue"?
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 14:48,
These guys must be 19 meters then :)
Attainable Rate:138907 kbits/s 49867 kbits/s
Slightly faster on the downstream but you've got 4Mbps on the upstream.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:11 PM Michael J. Carmody
wrote:
> For Comparison ~200m of copper gets you:
>
> https://paste
Couple of points for discussion:
1 - The overseas jurisdiction is to be met by whether you conduct business
within Australia. So that already covers the big corporates, social media
etc. If you want to continue to conduct business in Australia, you're going
to have to comply with Australian law or
For Comparison ~200m of copper gets you:
https://pastebin.freepbx.org/view/01d00095
-M
-Original Message-
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Rob Thomas
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2018 12:52 PM
To: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: [AusNOG] (Slightly OT) NBN
On 16/08/2018 11:09 AM, Paul Julian wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>
>
> Where do you even start ?
>
> I would love to be able to comment on these things properly but how do you
> structure
> a response that isn’t just a whinge and saying that it’s not fair and blah
> blah, it
> would need to offer alte
Hi Robert and Paul,
For the people that really want to make a difference there seems to be a good
argument for joining a group or organisation that will represent them as a
whole, I think this is good advice and I will be looking at the options for
sure.
Thanks for the information and for th
Hi Paul,
We have already published our stance on this previously in press releases
and our regular newsletter, and will be sending a formal response to the
govt's invitation to do so.
That response is currently being formulated to ensure we cover all
pertinent points, thus far (until we complete
I'll support this - join a group that can represent your interests in a combined
submissions that carries weight from the number of people/organisations/members
behind
it. It can be the ITPA, or Internet Australia (we have a dedicated ISP SIG for
industry things, which did make an effective differ
Hi Robert,
I think it’s a perfectly valid point, so just out of interest what is ITPA’s
plan to respond to this current situation ?
Regards
Paul
From: Robert Hudson
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2018 12:34 PM
To: p...@buildingconnect.com.au
Cc: Paul Wilkins ; ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: R
https://pastebin.freepbx.org/view/c383aa55
Attainable Rate:138550 kbits/s 54190 kbits/s
I am probably 20 meters of cable, if that, from the node 8)
--Rob
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/
Hello,
I have a requirement for 1RU-4RU in both NextDC B1 and NextDC P1.
Please advise hosting, remote hands, and cross connect fees. I’m looking for
36m term. Replies off list please.
PS: I have ½ Rack in S1 if anyone’s interested 😉
Stavros Patiniotis
Escapenet - Managing Directo
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 11:10, Paul Julian
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>
>
> Where do you even start ?
>
> I would love to be able to comment on these things properly but how do you
> structure a response that isn’t just a whinge and saying that it’s not fair
> and blah blah, it would need to offer altern
I think a lot of us can relate to Ross and James on this one, myself included.
But I am sure that's part of the plan for somebody.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: AusNOG On Behalf Of James Gray
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2018 12:03 PM
To: AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Dutto
> On 16 Aug 2018, at 11:37 am, Ross Wheeler wrote:
>
> In almost every case, regardless of how many industry players have made
> well-reasoned representation against whatever "todays" issue is, there have
> been few (if any) changes of any substance and eventually the futility of
> making sub
@Paul, it does depend on circumstances, but this law doesn't. This is
saying they will have full access.
And the priest therapist is on topic, you are saying that refusing to hand
over a password is to hold up law enforcement, then how does that same
argument not hold up to priests and therapists?
Bradley,
To be clear, lawyer, spouse confidentiality is qualified. It depends on
circumstances.
As to whether priests' and therapists' communications should enjoy
qualified privilege, that's a whole other debate :)
I "lost" the SSH key sounds like the dog ate my homework - tell it to the
judge.
> On 16 Aug 2018, at 11:09 am, Paul Julian wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Where do you even start ?
> I would love to be able to comment on these things properly but how do you
> structure a response that isn’t just a whinge and saying that it’s not fair
> and blah blah, it would need to offer alte
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Bradley Silverman wrote:
It's incredibly short sighted to say, we should give the government full
access to monitor anything and everything I do, which is what this is
leading towards, because only bad people need privacy.
One of the major objections (apart from the obv
Paul,
The OP posted the bill:
https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/consultations/Documents/the-assistance-access-bill-2018.pdf
It remains a bill until passes both houses of parliament, so this is a good
starting place for discussion of the bill's purposes, and provisions, and
their consequences.
Rememb
@Paul I can tell a lawyer, priest, therapist or spouse my secrets and the
judicial system can't force them to give up the information. Are you saying
those laws need to be changed too?
What if I had done nothing wrong, had a device that was using a SSH key to
access and legitimately lost the priva
Hi Paul,
Where do you even start ?
I would love to be able to comment on these things properly but how do you
structure a response that isn’t just a whinge and saying that it’s not fair and
blah blah, it would need to offer alternatives or suggestions on how else this
could be accomplished or
I believe the point of not surrendering a password or private key, is to
frustrate due judicial process. It's no different to barricading the door
if the police turn up with a search warrant - it's obstruction of justice,
and the only reason people won't surrender keys is fear of the consequences
o
https://www.crikey.com.au/2018/08/15/encryption-bill-password-jail/ is
behind a paywall but it makes the point in their preview.
--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich
http://cmlh.id.au/contact
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausno
*They're taking feedback/submissions/comments for 4 weeks only - is anyone
planning to submit some comment?*
It'd be sad if the government only saw response from a few corporates
representing their vested interests. Representative democracy only works on
a put up or shut up basis. Anyone with an i
25 matches
Mail list logo
