On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 11:26, Joseph Goldman wrote:
> From my understanding it can be a mixture of both. Metro areas shouldn't
> really have a problem on backhaul as busy towers would have 10, 40, or even
> 100gbit circuits to the base of the tower, that tends to be more a regional
> issue when
Gday Team,
Question 1. Anyone else getting customers who are needing to put circuits on
pause, as they are closing the doors temporarily? Any precedent whatsoever?
Question 2. This one is a touchy and maybe private topic, however any of you
moving to change freeze due to the chaotic nature of
AAPT certainly were running SS7 over various SDH technologies when I was last
working on their call centre platform a few years back.
From: AusNOG on behalf of Mark Delany
Sent: Monday, 23 March 2020 15:20
To: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re:
> Yes. With Telstra, it's an EXTRAORDINARLY big deal. You still have to
> use specific hardware, and SS7 signaling over ISDN
Oh. My bad. I was basing my assumptions on how I've seen voice delivered in the
US. Even
big ol' bad boy and recalcitrant Telco, AT provides SIP over a PNI. At my
$DayJob
Hi Brad,
Not too sure I agree with your sentiments; people still get call failures and
congestion occurs during the NYE event. Additionally, calls during the NYE
event are quite short in nature and therefore channels are constantly cycled
through at a higher rate. This event is not remotely
>
> I don't doubt that you're right Rob, but help me out here. Surely
> voice traffic is such a tiny drop in the networking-traffic bucket
> that any sort of increase is still largely insignificant.
>
> Are you saying that voice interconnects are big, fat, pipes and that
> ramping them up is a big
We seem to manage on New Years Eve with no issues..
Who is providing the SIP endpoints for the hotline.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:35 AM Sean Agius wrote:
> It’s not SIP channel issue unfortunately. Rob is on the money.
>
>
>
> I am led to believe that line orders are being provisioned with
It's complicated
Ignoring channel aggregation (CA), the maximum amount of spectrum available
to an LTE endpoint is 20Mhz, which is shared with everyone in the same
sector. The amount of spectrum might be as small as 1.5Mhz
If you have say an iPhone X with 2x2 MIMO, and can stand close enough to
It’s not SIP channel issue unfortunately. Rob is on the money.
I am led to believe that line orders are being provisioned with urgency to
increase capacity, so definitely not a BW or SIP issue per-se.
All congestion is stemming from the COVID-19 Hotline and affecting multiple
Tier 1 providers
"That tends to be more a regional issue when backhauled by microwave"
I guess also some areas that have only Telstra backhaul (Think anything
north of Geraldton in WA for example) would only buy minimal amounts of
backhaul from Telstra to a capital city.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:26 AM Joseph
it sounds to me more like a finite number of SIP channels, rather than
bandwidth.
could quite easily be a licenced capacity on an SBC type deal
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Delany wrote:
> On 23Mar20, Rob Thomas allegedly wrote:
> > If you've got customers complaining about not being
On 23Mar20, Rob Thomas allegedly wrote:
> If you've got customers complaining about not being able to make calls
> from Telstra (landlines or mobiles) there's a good chance it's because
> Telstra don't have enough interconnect channels to other carriers.
>
> It's a known issue, and people above
I do a 'little' bit of radio work so I am in no way an expert.
From my understanding it can be a mixture of both. Metro areas
shouldn't really have a problem on backhaul as busy towers would have
10, 40, or even 100gbit circuits to the base of the tower, that tends to
be more a regional issue
If you've got customers complaining about not being able to make calls
from Telstra (landlines or mobiles) there's a good chance it's because
Telstra don't have enough interconnect channels to other carriers.
It's a known issue, and people above my pay grade are caring about it.
--Rob
+1 needed for clarification also.
Philippines carriers are a mess.
Just to add to the mix, the provider I use has 10+ APN's, and on any given
day, 1 or 2 of the APN's will be consistently faster than the other 8.
So Backhaul, Spectrum, APN are the factors where I cannot figure the
slowness.
Troy Baird wrote:
> There are options for cost effective smaller 10g fanless switches
> that are perfect for this situation
Passive DWDM optical systems work too -- no electronics in the street
at all, and so no need for expensive provision of roadside electricity.
DWDM gear is normally
On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 16:10 +1100, Jason Leschnik wrote:
> > Fibre to the house was the original correct design.
> Sorry formy uneducated understanding but how practical would have
> fibre to the home end-to-end across the country really been? I'm sure
> this is something Bevan might understand
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 17:13, Troy Baird wrote:
> There are options for cost effective smaller 10g fanless switches that are
> perfect for this situation
>
> Ones coming to my place in May...
>
I was using a Baby Brocade (ICX 6450 I think it was) in a previous job that
would have been ideal
There are options for cost effective smaller 10g fanless switches that are
perfect for this situation
Ones coming to my place in May...
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, 7:02 pm Tony Wicks, wrote:
> >Sorry from uneducated understanding but how practical would have fibre to
> the home end-to-end across
>Sorry from uneducated understanding but how practical would have fibre to the
>home end-to-end across the country really been? I'm sure this is something
>Bevan might understand with his experience truck rolling fibre installs. But
>surely backhoe->ing the whole country is a nice idea in
20 matches
Mail list logo
