[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001290]: arpa/inet.h - origin of socklen_t is unclear

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1290 == Reported By:joelsherrill Assigned To:

RE: A question on file flags after fork

> -Original Message- > From: Ronald F. Guilmette > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 8:16 AM > To: austin-group-l@opengroup.org > Subject: Re: A question on file flags after fork > > In message , > Shware Systems

Re: A question on file flags after fork

In message <16937.1578995...@jinx.noi.kre.to>, Robert Elz wrote: >But you do need some experience reading standards... I would like to pause just longe enough to thank you all for the unambiguously patronizing and derogatory manner in which you have welcomed me into your community, all due

RE: system() and pthread_atfork()

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Elz > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 11:35 AM > To: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA IOT SES-DE) > Cc: nate.karst...@garmin.com; austin-group-l@opengroup.org > Subject: Re: system() and pthread_atfork() > | The point I was trying to make with the text you

Re: system() and pthread_atfork()

Date:Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:35:14 + From:"Schwarz, Konrad" Message-ID: | Captain Obvious here: | A minimal quality of implementation attribute for DHCP daemons is for | these addresses to remain fixed for as long as possible. Yes, address stability is

Re: A question on file flags after fork

Date:Mon, 13 Jan 2020 23:16:03 -0800 From:"Ronald F. Guilmette" Message-ID: <39544.1578986...@segfault.tristatelogic.com> | OK. I see where I took a wrong turn now, In which case the lengthy reply I just sent can be ignored... | however I must say that I |

Re: A question on file flags after fork

Date:Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:26:33 -0800 From:"Ronald F. Guilmette" Message-ID: <38942.1578975...@segfault.tristatelogic.com> | While developing some C code recently, and testing that, I came upon a | VERY surprising and unexpected result. It appears that various

Re: A question on file flags after fork

Hi Danny and Ronald, The austin-group-l e-mail list is a perfectly fine place to discuss the contents and interpretation of the current standard as well as the development of future revisions and amendments to the standard. Places like unix.stackexchange.com and unix.com are fine places to go

RE: system() and pthread_atfork()

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Elz > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:43 PM > To: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA IOT SES-DE) > Cc: nate.karst...@garmin.com; austin-group-l@opengroup.org > Subject: Re: system() and pthread_atfork() > > Date:Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:13:04 + >