The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:
The issue 0001593 has been set as DUPLICATE OF the following issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
==
Reported By:eblake
Assi
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:ajosey
Geoff Clare wrote in
:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote, on 01 Dec 2022:
|> Being here, i note an increasing number of "null terminators" for
|> strings, which surely is wrong as NULL==(void*)0 (or similar aka
|> 0x0, 0, __null, whatever they are doing now and have complained or
|> even failed about (
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote, on 01 Dec 2022:
>
> Being here, i note an increasing number of "null terminators" for
> strings, which surely is wrong as NULL==(void*)0 (or similar aka
> 0x0, 0, __null, whatever they are doing now and have complained or
> even failed about (?) in the past if misused), wher
If it was not the GNU C library info manual around Y2K which
mentioned how a SUN_LEN() has to look like if it is not available.
In the accepted text in
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561, for bind(2), a space
is missing in between where and address_len.
For AF_UNIX sockets, some impl
Olivier Certner wrote in
<9027911.U91TZCKOhC@ravel>:
|> Having written that, I did test that 'sizeof(((struct
|> sockaddr_un*)0)->sun_path)' compiles with gcc, although I'm less
|> certain of whether the C standard permits that (or even if that
|> permission has changed over time) - the expres
Eric Blake wrote in
<20221130150909.pei323lktieb4...@redhat.com>:
|On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:54:03AM -0600, Eric Blake via austin-group-l \
|at The Open Group wrote:
|>> ...
|>>|https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
|>
|> First, I chose that wording because 'sizeof(struct
|> socka
Hi,
> Having written that, I did test that 'sizeof(((struct
> sockaddr_un*)0)->sun_path)' compiles with gcc, although I'm less
> certain of whether the C standard permits that (or even if that
> permission has changed over time) - the expression argument to sizeof
> is unevaluated, which counters
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:54:03AM -0600, Eric Blake via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
> > ...
> > |https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
>
> First, I chose that wording because 'sizeof(struct
> sockaddr_un.sun_path)' doesn't compile. You are right that 'sizeof
> NAME.sun_pat
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:30:36PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l
at The Open Group wrote:
> Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote in
> :
> ...
> |https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
> ...
> |--
> | (0006085)
Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote in
:
...
|https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
...
|--
| (0006085) geoffclare (manager) - 2022-11-28 16:24
| https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561#c6085
|--
The following issue has been RESOLVED.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:ajose
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:ajosey
The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001593.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=561
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned T
15 matches
Mail list logo
