At 1243434830 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> Okay, I re-did the patch with imlib_blend_image_onto_image_skewed in a fashion
> which allows the user to quickly blend one image into another without much
> hassle but which gives them all parameters to
> imlib_blend_image_onto_image_skewed if they want t
Okay, I re-did the patch with imlib_blend_image_onto_image_skewed in a fashion
which allows the user to quickly blend one image into another without much
hassle but which gives them all parameters to
imlib_blend_image_onto_image_skewed if they want them.
--
GCS/IT/M d- s+:- a--- C++ UL+++ US UB++
At Wed, 27 May 2009 15:42:08 +0200
Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi Gregor,
>
> So nice to see you hacking back!
>
> At 1243430586 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> > after a rather long time without any patches from me, here's a small one
> > from me (just to get warmed up :P). It adds a function called :i
Hi Gregor,
So nice to see you hacking back!
At 1243430586 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> after a rather long time without any patches from me, here's a small one from
> me (just to get warmed up :P). It adds a function called :insert() to image
> objects, which, as the name says, inserts one image
Hi people,
after a rather long time without any patches from me, here's a small one from
me (just to get warmed up :P). It adds a function called :insert() to image
objects, which, as the name says, inserts one image into another. It takes
three arguments:
1: The image to insert
2: (optional)