Re: [Axiom-developer] Using ALLPROSE for SPAD programming

2006-08-21 Thread root
> Nevertheless, my contribution do the documentation discussion is > non-ALLPROSE. Did you consider using an "javadoc" style for > documentation. E.g. doxygen is a mature and flexible tool aimed primary > at C++ but extended to some more languages. The output formats include > html, latex, and rtf.

RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Eitan Gurari
> I am "scratching > my head" ... how do I update my installation? Bill, I added a pointer to instructions at the end of the first paragraph in http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html Hopefully they are not buggy. -eitan

RE: [Axiom-developer] Using ALLPROSE for SPAD programming

2006-08-21 Thread Gernot Hueber
Hi, First of all, I want to point out that I don't want to advocate against ALLPROSE for documentation, which is in fact an interesting development framework. Nevertheless, my contribution do the documentation discussion is non-ALLPROSE. Did you consider using an "javadoc" style for documentation.

RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Page, Bill
On Monday, August 21, 2006 10:21 PM Eitan Gurari wrote: > ... > > Eitan Gurari was also working on a jsMath version of tex4ht. > > I am not sure of the status of that version. > > A jsmath configuration for tex4ht went public on 21 Dec 2005 (see > http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bu

RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Eitan Gurari
> > \documentclass{article} > > \usepackage{axiom} > > \begin{document} > > ... > > \end{document} > What is axiom.4ht? Can it be present in the source .tex even > if I just run latex to get the standard dvi, ps, and pdf? The \usepackage{axiom} instruction requests a general purpose style

[Axiom-developer] Cannot Rename The File Erlib To NRLIB

2006-08-21 Thread Page, Bill
On Friday, August 18, 2006 3:08 PM Camm Maguire wrote: > > This one I believe is machine specific -- can I log in and > reproduce? (is this axiom-developer.org?) Yes. Please do. > > In general, the easiest way for me to fix these things is to > work with a build atop GCL configured with --enabl

RE: [Axiom-developer] Using ALLPROSE for SPAD programming

2006-08-21 Thread Page, Bill
On Monday, August 21, 2006 1:08 PM Martin Rubey wrote: > > > I wrote: > > > In fact, I think it's high time to switch to ALLPROSE. As > > > far as I know, the only bit missing is to make it talk to > > > axiom instead of aldor, but that shouldn't be too difficult, > > > Ralf? > Bill Page wrote: >

RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Page, Bill
Ralf, On Monday, August 21, 2006 6:15 PM you wrote: > > On 08/21/2006 04:43 PM, Bill Page wrote: > > Martin, > > > > On August 21, 2006 4:01 AM you wrote: > >> Bill Page writes: > >>> As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a > >>> little differently with only a "thumbnail" displa

[Axiom-developer] Re: NULL_OR_ON_C_STACK macro invalid (was: noweb)

2006-08-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Here is a | | svn -diff | | of my working copy with the accummulated patches | | http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/public/camm-patches-2.6.8pre.txt | | Will this work for you? Many thanks. This is exactly what I was looking for. | You will also nee

Re: [Axiom-developer] latest GCL problem

2006-08-21 Thread root
ah. i had 2 out of 3. meatloaf claims this isn't bad but he's clearly not a programmer :-) t ___ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Re: [Axiom-developer] latest GCL problem

2006-08-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Tim, | | You seem to be missing Camm's patches. See attached email sent | to you by Camm on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:19 PM. Bill, could you collect all the relevant links in a single message? That would be very helpful -- Gaby

[Axiom-developer] RE: NULL_OR_ON_C_STACK macro invalid (was: noweb)

2006-08-21 Thread Page, Bill
Gaby, On Saturday, August 19, 2006 2:23 PM you wrote: > > Bill Page writes: > > | On August 19, 2006 9:51 AM Gaby wrote: > | > ... > | > OK; so let's me summarize a candidate patch for axiom.silver or > | > axiom.build-improvements: > | > > | >* apparently, GCL 2.6.8pre from CVS has more i

Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
On 08/21/2006 04:43 PM, Bill Page wrote: Martin, On August 21, 2006 4:01 AM you wrote: Bill Page writes: As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a little differently with only a "thumbnail" displayed on the web page containing links to the pdf and dvi format generated by LaTeX.

RE: [Axiom-developer] latest GCL problem

2006-08-21 Thread Page, Bill
Tim, You seem to be missing Camm's patches. See attached email sent to you by Camm on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:19 PM. Regards, Bill Page. On Monday, August 21, 2006 2:58 PM you wrote: > > I've been trying to build Axiom with the latest gcl-2.6.8pre checkout. > > It fails when trying to comp

[Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-math] Curious behavior of Taylor series

2006-08-21 Thread Martin Rubey
Dear Igor, great that you found the reason. Do you think you'd have the time to document properly just the function powern? What you found is not the first bug in these 10 lines of code :-( If you do have time, you should also look at the corresponding code for SUPXS (very likely in ISUPS which i

[Axiom-developer] latest GCL problem

2006-08-21 Thread root
Camm, I've been trying to build Axiom with the latest gcl-2.6.8pre checkout. It fails when trying to compile the file in src/interp/sockio.lisp.pamphlet specifically it fails with: 118 making /tmp/axiom49/int/interp/soc

Re: [Axiom-developer] Using ALLPROSE for SPAD programming

2006-08-21 Thread Martin Rubey
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am sorry Martin, but I don't understand. ALLPROSE does what already? The > problem referred to above is related to generating HTML from Axiom pamphlet > source that can be used on the Axiom Wiki. Does Ralf have a version of > ALLPROSE that can do that?

[Axiom-developer] Re: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Alfredo Portes
Bill,On 8/20/06, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By "complete" do you mean the output of an entire Axiom session?Using just dvipng would result in one png file for each page ofthe latex document. Certainly it is possible to present the outputof LaTeX in this format but treating everything as a

RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Bill Page
Martin, On August 21, 2006 4:01 AM you wrote: > > Bill Page writes: > > As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a > > little differently with only a "thumbnail" displayed on > > the web page containing links to the pdf and dvi format > > generated by LaTeX. Originally we had plann

Re: [Axiom-developer] repetition of \subsection{Layer21} in src/algebra/Makefile.pamphlet

2006-08-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > There are two subsections "Layer 21" in the file | > src/algebra/Makefile.pamphlet. The line 1054 can be removed. | | fixed. available in the next release --t *** ChangeLog (revision 15577) --- ChangeLog (local) *** *** 1,3 --- 1,7 +

[Axiom-developer] [mainline] PATCH to op.spad.pamphlet: fix typo in comment

2006-08-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
*** src/algebra/ChangeLog (revision 1) --- src/algebra/ChangeLog (local) *** *** 1,3 --- 1,7 + 2006-08-21 Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * op.spad.pamphlet: Fix typo in comment. + 2006-07-31 Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: Another question

2006-08-21 Thread Martin Rubey
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a little differently > with only a "thumbnail" displayed on the web page containing links to the pdf > and dvi format generated by LaTeX. Originally we had planned to use TeX4ht > to produce a web page

[Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-mail] Category parameters and "this" domain

2006-08-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Why is this a mail to axiom-mail instead of axiom-developer? because it is about use of Axiom. I'm wearing my Axiom user hat here. | On 08/21/2006 01:22 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Hi, | >The SPAD compiler accepts and happily compiles this: |

[Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-mail] Category parameters and "this" domain

2006-08-21 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
Why is this a mail to axiom-mail instead of axiom-developer? On 08/21/2006 01:22 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: Hi, The SPAD compiler accepts and happily compiles this: )abbrev category FOO Foo ++ A Foo is something we can foo with. Foo(m : ($, $) ->$) : Category == SetCategory with