[Axiom-developer] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: A small error in discardGraph()

2007-12-13 Thread Martin Rubey
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin Rubey wrote: > > > > Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Gregory Vanuxem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Here is a patchlet that needs to be reviewed. It fixes a bug in the > > > > function 'dis

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-13 Thread Martin Rubey
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 14 Dec 2007 06:42:13 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote: > > ... > > Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by > > the proposal above? > > > > The version of axiom that no longer exhibits the problem. But I'd guess that would vary from i

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-13 Thread Bill Page
On 14 Dec 2007 06:42:13 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote: > ... > Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by > the proposal above? > The version of axiom that no longer exhibits the problem. Regards, Bill Page. ___ Axiom-developer maili

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-13 Thread Martin Rubey
Bill, Gaby, > > I guess the simplest solution is to replace the "status" categories > > as follows: > > > > open ... open in all versions > > closed ... closed in all versions > > > > closed in FriCAS > > closed in OpenAxiom > > closed in Axiom > > > > open in FriCAS --- closed in Axiom and Ope

[Axiom-developer] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-13 Thread Bill Page
Gaby, On 12/13/07, you wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Bill Page wrote: > > | I am not against revising the status categories so they are > | more specific and better organized but I do think it is essential > | that we treat all versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on > | the NewSynthesis

[Axiom-developer] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-13 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Bill Page wrote: | I am not against revising the status categories so they are more | specific and better organized but I do think it is essential that we | treat all versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the | NewSynthesis Axiom Wiki. Doing things the way you suggest

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-13 Thread Bill Page
Martin, On 13 Dec 2007 08:08:05 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote: > ... > > > 2) By magic, or Bill Page, we introduce the possibility of closing > > > issues for any subset of {axiom, open-axiom, fricas}. I have > > > no idea how that could work, however. In particular, if one > > > selects

Re: [Axiom-developer] A small error in discardGraph()

2007-12-13 Thread root
Greg, Thanks. It will go out after the current build/test cycle completes. Tim ___ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

[Axiom-developer] A small error in discardGraph()

2007-12-13 Thread Gregory Vanuxem
Hello, Here is a patchlet that needs to be reviewed. It fixes a bug in the function 'discardGraph' (src/graph/viewman/makeGraph.c). This bug is triggered when closing a view2D window [see the end of this email]. @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ for (j=0, pL=theGraph->listOfListsOfPoints; jnumberOf

Re: [Axiom-developer] Building silver git tree on Gentoo

2007-12-13 Thread C Y
I think this is what did it - I'm rebuilding to confirm. CY diff -Naur silver/src/graph/view2d/Makefile.pamphlet silver-compile/src/graph/view2d/Makefile.pamphlet --- silver/src/graph/view2d/Makefile.pamphlet 2007-12-11 23:08:32.0 -0500 +++ silver-compile/src/graph/view2d/Makefile.pamph