Using ‘/TP’ option (compile
all files as .cpp) with cl
seem to solve the problem. Include in buildInitialize.xml
VC++ compiler options.
Samisa…
-Original Message-
From: Chinthana C. Dinapala
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005
10:17 AM
To: Apache AXIS C
Hi Mark,
Yeah sure, post the changes that you intend to make in the mailing list
so that we may be able to help you whether your changes will fit in with
our design or not.
BTW are attachments (server side) running on AIX?
Rangika
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:34 +0100, Mark Whitlock wrote:
>
>
>
Hi guys,
Today build failing due to following
error.
[cc] Generating Code...
[cc] Compiling...
[cc] apr_base64.c
[cc] C:\Program Files\Microsoft
Visual Studio\VC98\include\eh.h(32) : fat
al error C1189: #error : "eh.h is
only for C++!"
[cc] G
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-652?page=all ]
Chinthana Danapala updated AXISCPP-652:
---
Attachment: BeanParamWriter.java
This problem occurs due to the changes i have made for support "all" construct.
I have made the corrections and
Hi John,
We
run our test server on windows 2003 server and VC++ 6. (So
only the OS differes). In addition, we develop
on Win XP machines with VC6.
We
have never tried VC7.
Linux:
We have Fedora core 2 system with gcc version 3.3.3
Thanks,
Samis
Let me clear the air a bit more here.
In the way we have implemented both ‘choice’
and ‘all’ constructs, we use C++ NULL value to check if some field
is optional in serialization. In other words, if a field is optional as per the
WSDL definition, and if the C++ class attribute is NULL,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-652?page=all ]
Samisa Abeysinghe reassigned AXISCPP-652:
-
Assign To: Dushshantha Chandradasa
Chintana has found how to fix this. Dushshantha will take care of the commits
> NilValuesTest failing
> -
John,
Differences in the compiler used for the product vs. an application should
not normally present a problem
However the one place you can get issues is with name mangling of C++
functions, though I don't think there are issues
between MS VC6 and VC7 on Windows. There ARE mangling issues bet
OS/400 is 64-bit machine. ints and longs are 32 bit. long long is 64bit.
In addition, I was wondering why we do not use the file to
determine max/min value for the various types? I saw that we hard-code
the values when checking for ranges.
Nadir K. Amra
Mark Whitlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hi All,
I implemented the support for ‘choice’ WSDL
construct in Axis C++ . According to our design, generated stub level
classes serialize the choice elements in the following way.
int Axis_Serialize_ChoiceComplexType(ChoiceComplexType*
param, IWrapperSoapSerializer* pSZ, bool bAr
Hi Jeff,
The soap fault model in the client changed in the last release. I don't
know whether soap faults work in the server. Does your service load when
you remove the soap faults from your wsdl?
I have reopened AXISCPP-237 since it is still a problem.
Mark
Mark Whitlock
IBM
- Forwarded
Hi Rangika,
I will continue to investigate what I need over what support is already in
the code. I did not want to offend yourself or Damitha by implementing this
if he already part-way through implementing this himself. I am keen to
ensure that my changes fit in with your design so I will post
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-237?page=all ]
Mark Whitlock reopened AXISCPP-237:
---
Jeff Clary wrote on the mailing list...
> One more thing. The JIRA bug AXISCPP-237 has a comment at
> the bottom that mentions a memory deallocation
xsd_unsignedLong not long enough to hold max SOAP value
---
Key: AXISCPP-653
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-653
Project: Axis-C++
Type: Bug
Components: SOAP
Reporter: Mark Whitlock
In Ax
Hi,
I am investigating getting Axis C++ working on AIX 64 bit mode. The sizes
of longs (and ints?) are different on different platforms and in 32bit and
64bit mode. I propose that the sizes of the xsd types in AxisUserAPI.hpp
should be the same on all platforms in all modes since the maximum va
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-652?page=comments#action_65592 ]
Dushshantha Chandradasa commented on AXISCPP-652:
-
I found the problem here. Here the elements in aRecord complex type are in a
wsdl 'all' block.
Hi Folks,
Does any one have any information on
what OS's and compilers on those OS's are upwards compatibile? i.e. if
I build using compiler level 'a' what newer levels of compiler and Os can
I build and run my app on?
If you could give me any information
on what you are running AXISCPP on would
Hi Mark,
I'm not involved in attachment support client side.I was only involved
in server side.Damitha is working on client side I'm not sure how far
he has done.I think he wouldn't mind you working on it.
Regds
Rangika
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:31 +0100, Mark Whitlock wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Damit
18 matches
Mail list logo