l put a RC.
>
> Thanks,
> Samsia...
>
> > -Manjula.
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Samisa...
> >>
> >> Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> >>
> >>> I like to be the release manager.
> >>>
>
,
Samsia...
-Manjula.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
I like to be the release manager.
Regards,
Supun.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <mailto:sam...@wso2.com>> wrote:
We need a volunteer to play RM role for next release.
Thanks,
er.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Supun.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe > <mailto:sam...@wso2.com>> wrote:
> >
> > We need a volunteer to play RM role for next release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Samisa...
role for next release.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
Manjula Peiris wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 23:19 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
sa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> I like to be the release manager.
>
>
> And what should be our next releas
o
>> for 1.4.1 or may be 1.4.5?
>>
>> Supun..
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
>>>
like to be the release manager.
>>>
>>
>> And what should be our next release 1.4.1 or 1.5.0?
>>
>> Samisa...
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
e:
>
>> I like to be the release manager.
>>
>
> And what should be our next release 1.4.1 or 1.5.0?
>
> Samisa...
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
I like to be the release manager.
And what should be our next release 1.4.1 or 1.5.0?
Samisa...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
I like to be the release manager.
And what is our next releae 1.4.1 or 1.5.0?
Samisa...
Regards,
Supun.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
We need a volunteer to play RM r
>
> wrote:
>
>> We need a volunteer to play RM role for next release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Samisa...
>>
>> Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
>>
>>> Manjula Peiris wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 23:19 +0530, Samisa Abe
I like to be the release manager.
Regards,
Supun.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need a volunteer to play RM role for next release.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
> Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
>
>> Manjula Peiris wrote
We need a volunteer to play RM role for next release.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
Manjula Peiris wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 23:19 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why not relea
Manjula Peiris wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 23:19 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why not release the MTOM Caching stuff as an "experimental"
feature. That way users can also sneak a peak and test the s
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 23:19 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Why not release the MTOM Caching stuff as an "experimental"
> >> feature. That way users can also sneak a peak and test the stuff.
> >>
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why not release the MTOM Caching stuff as an "experimental"
feature. That way users can also sneak a peak and test the stuff.
I think we may need to wait one more month for the release as Manjula
suggested. IMHO,
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not release the MTOM Caching stuff as an "experimental"
> feature. That way users can also sneak a peak and test the stuff.
I think we may need to wait one more month for the release as Manjula
suggested. IMHO, if we could do this release end
we wait one more month for the next release ?
I think we can do a release without MTOM caching end of this
month. I feel like we have enough features to do so. When MTOM caching
is finish (I mean implementing and testing) we can do another
release. What do you think ?
Why not release the M
alal wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > >> So how about end of this month?
>> > >
>> > > If we are going to do this end of this month then we need to feature
>> > > freeze now. Th
h?
> > >
> > > If we are going to do this end of this month then we need to feature
> > > freeze now. Then MTOM caching stuff can't be added. IMHO 1.4 is a
> pretty
> > > stable release, so shall we wait one more month for the next release ?
> >
>
aching stuff can't be added. IMHO 1.4 is a pretty
> > stable release, so shall we wait one more month for the next release ?
>
> I think we can do a release without MTOM caching end of this
> month. I feel like we have enough features to do so. When MTOM caching
> is finish (I
Hi,
Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So how about end of this month?
>
> If we are going to do this end of this month then we need to feature
> freeze now. Then MTOM caching stuff can't be added. IMHO 1.4 is a pretty
> stable release, so shall we wai
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 22:45 -0700, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> These are the features that we can support in the next release:
>
> IIS 6 & 7 integration (Already Done)
> AMQP Transport (Already Done)
> MTOM Improvements (Manjula Please inform us on this)
As I have said
These are the features that we can support in the next release:
IIS 6 & 7 integration (Already Done)
AMQP Transport (Already Done)
MTOM Improvements (Manjula Please inform us on this)
Bug Fixes (Still we have about 80 Jiras left and I think we should reduce
it, at least to 40)
So how about
OK, shall we decide what features goes into the next release and when we
are going to do it?
Samisa...
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi Manjula,
Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Are we going to include MTOM caching in this release ?
Receiving side is ok .I am work
Hi Manjula,
Manjula Peiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Are we going to include MTOM caching in this release ?
>
> Receiving side is ok .I am working at sending side. Seems to me we need
> to fix http chunking at our client transport.
What I really mean is , we need to decide whether to include
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:13 +0530, Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Time to discuss next release?
>
> Are we going to include MTOM caching in this release ?
Receiving side is ok .I am working at sending side. S
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Time to discuss next release?
Are we going to include MTOM caching in this release ?
thanks,
Dinesh
--
http://nethu.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
IIS 6 and 7 support will be good features to the next release. It will take
another one or two weeks.
Supun..
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to discuss next release?
&
Time to discuss next release?
Samisa...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for 1.2
I think it's inevitable when Neethi/C is getting matured. Unless
Neethi/C become a separate project. (Which I don't see as an important
step at this moment).
Cheers,
Kau
Manjula Peiris wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:54 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:54 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> We just released 1.1.0, but I think we also have to look forward and
> >> see what should be next.
> >> I need this info to update the Jira
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We just released 1.1.0, but I think we also have to look forward and
see what should be next.
I need this info to update the Jira etc.
Ideally it should be a 1.1.1 but if there are API additions we should
go for 1.2
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We just released 1.1.0, but I think we also have to look forward and
> see what should be next.
> I need this info to update the Jira etc.
>
> Ideally it should be a 1.1.1 but if there are API additions we should
> go for 1.2
I also think it sh
We just released 1.1.0, but I think we also have to look forward and see
what should be next.
I need this info to update the Jira etc.
Ideally it should be a 1.1.1 but if there are API additions we should go
for 1.2
Thoughts?
Samisa...
--
Samisa Abeysinghe : WSO2 WSF/PHP
"http://wso2.org/pr
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We apparently did not get any serious bugs reported against 1.0.0
release. So IMHO, there is no immediate need for a 1.0.1.
Can we presume that there may be Axis2/C 1.0.1 release someother day?
Yes you can. We
Hi,
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We apparently did not get any serious bugs reported against 1.0.0
> release. So IMHO, there is no immediate need for a 1.0.1.
Can we presume that there may be Axis2/C 1.0.1 release someother day?
Do we have any plans to follow Apr version numberi
+1 for a realease.
But before the release some bug fixing and a proper way of freeing
neethi_assertion has to be done.
-Manjula.
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 11:55 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> We apparently did not get any serious bugs reported against 1.0.0
> release. So IMHO, there is no imme
We apparently did not get any serious bugs reported against 1.0.0
release. So IMHO, there is no immediate need for a 1.0.1.
In the mean time, we have progressed with more new features, especially,
we have the WS-Policy implementation integrated to the Axis2/C main svn
trunk. Hence I thin, as p
Jim Seipp wrote:
Hi,
Is there any schedule for the next/final release of Axis2?
We hope to release 1.0.0 by the end of this month. We will have release
candidate out hopefully by end of this week.
Anyway, I do not think 1.0.0 would be the final release - there would be
many improvements to
Hi,
Is there any schedule for the next/final release of Axis2?
Thanks,
Jim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Nadir!
Franz
Nadir Amra schrieb:
Franz,
Still trying to learn about the release process. Unless someone with
experience volunteers to be release manager, I have to figure this out
and it will take some time - and I am very busy with other work so I guess
I cannot commit to anythin
Franz,
Still trying to learn about the release process. Unless someone with
experience volunteers to be release manager, I have to figure this out
and it will take some time - and I am very busy with other work so I guess
I cannot commit to anything right now except to say I am trying to see
Hello Nadir,
What are your current 1.6 release prospects?
Do you have a tentative timeline first for a release candidate and then
a real release?
Will AXISCPP (given the advent of AXISC) be dead after 1.6 or can we
expect 1.6.1 or even (gasp) 1.7?
Which JIRAs do you plan to work on before 1.6?
44 matches
Mail list logo
