Re: Client configuration without axiscpp.conf?

Is this a wish? May be it should go in to the wish list at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/AxisC_2b_2b/WishList sanjaya. - Original Message - From: "Samisa Abeysinghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache AXIS C User List" Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:38 AM Subject: Re: Client conf

Re: Client configuration without axiscpp.conf?

> Is it possible to specify the configuration parameters to the Axis C++ > client without using axiscpp.conf. No. The only way is to have c conf file :-( > > I am concerned that multiple clients on the same machine are forced to share > the same /etc/axiscpp.conf file. Also I am concerned that

Client configuration without axiscpp.conf?

Hi, Another newbie question Is it possible to specify the configuration parameters to the Axis C++ client without using axiscpp.conf. I am concerned that multiple clients on the same machine are forced to share the same /etc/axiscpp.conf file. Also I am concerned that multiple clients with

Deserialization of arrays of complex elements with nil members

I am using Axis C++ on the client side. One of my operations returns an array of: typedef struct ComplexTag {         xsd__string value1;         xsd__string value2;         xsd__string value3; } Complex; typedef struct Complex_ArrayTag {         Complex** m_Array;         int m_Size; } Complex_

Re: Array serialization?

Thanks Samisa, Yes - this works around the problem. Thanks again. I now have a complex array deserialization issue. I'll post that in a separate thread. Tim -- IBM Tivoli Access Manager Development Gold Coast Development Lab, Australia +61-7-5552-4001 phone +61-7-5571-0420 fax Samisa Abeysingh

Re: returning XML as xsd:string

Hi Bruce, Yes I was using this kind of tag but I was not using the XML entities < and > but the < and > signs. Stephane Bruce McHaffie wrote: Thanks for your suggestion Stephane. I tried it out. The parser is now getting the following SOAP message: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";

RE: returning XML as xsd:string

Title: RE: returning XML as xsd:string Hi guys, thanks for the responses. I have a lot of leeway in defining the content of the XML that is returned, so changing the WSDL is not a problem, neither is embedding in a CDATA tag. Basically this solution does not have to be general. But, I haven't

Re: Fw: Gnu Make files

+1 On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:55:01 +, John Hawkins wrote > Hello, > > does anyone out there use the -m function (creation of makefiles) on WSDL2Ws ? If not then we are thnking of removing it to increase stability. > > cheers, > John. > > - Forwarded by John Hawkins/UK/IBM on 0

Re: Fw: Gnu Make files

+1 for removing. chinthana On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:55:01 +, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > does anyone out there use the -m function (creation of makefiles) on WSDL2Ws > ? If not then we are thnking of removing it to increase stability. > > cheers, > John. > >

Re: Fw: Gnu Make files

+1 from me too. Dushshantha... On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:53:56 +, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for removing. > > Samisa... > > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:55:01 +, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > does anyone out there use the -m function (cr

Re: Fw: Gnu Make files

+1 for removing. Samisa... On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:55:01 +, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > does anyone out there use the -m function (creation of makefiles) on WSDL2Ws > ? If not then we are thnking of removing it to increase stability. > > cheers, > John. >

Fw: Gnu Make files

Hello, does anyone out there use the -m function (creation of makefiles) on WSDL2Ws ? If not then we are thnking of removing it to increase stability. cheers, John. - Forwarded by John Hawkins/UK/IBM on 09/02/2005 09:49 - Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/02/2005 06:19 P