[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sébastien Majerowicz updated AXIS2-3827:
Attachment: WKCheckElsaSidService.wsdl
Hello Glen,
a wsdl which causes problem was
Nadir,
retiring Axis1 is a totally separate thing from Axis2 going TLP. Not
related at all. All of us would get to vote on Axis1 being retired. So
don't worry, if you think it should not be retired then it won't be.
thanks,
dims
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Nadir Amra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Folks,
this is *NOT* a VOTE thread. Please refrain from casting ballots
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm -1 because the Axis2 project is not just axis2- its a collection of
> enabling pieces (axiom, neethi at least) and a bunch of
Jeez I wasn't casting a vote - I expressed my opinion and then made it
clear using the Apache terminology for expressing positions. Lighten up dude.
Sanjiva.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
this is *NOT* a VOTE thread. Please refrain from casting ballots
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at
Gee...thanks a ton for the clarficiation.
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeez I wasn't casting a vote - I expressed my opinion and then made it clear
> using the Apache terminology for expressing positions. Lighten up dude.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey dims, all:
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>
>> There was a WS PMC thread which has not yet shown up here
>>
>> So, WDYT? Could we spin off Axis2 and related projects into a separate
>> TLP? Pros / Cons / Thoughts welc
Dear Team,
For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the board level
that a small focused PMC that directly reports to the board is better
than a huge umbrella PMCs. two umbrella PMC's have already made
transitions including XML and Jakarta.
One reason is that they have found that a sm
> One reason is that they have found that a small focused PMC/committer
> set takes better care of the code, web site, releases, legal issues
> and basic oversight of day to day workings of a PMC better than a huge
> umbrella PMC. For example, personally i think Synapse has thrived
> after it left
Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
Personally, I'd really like to get all of us committed, willing and
able to contribute in a much more coordinated fashion then we are
today. We don't hang out on IRC, no weekly chats, not much forward
looking discussions, not much enthusiasm or cooperation anymore from
lo
Typo in AxisServlet init-params
---
Key: AXIS2-4102
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4102
Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4.1
Reporter: Luis Parravicin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luis Parravicini updated AXIS2-4102:
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
> Typo in AxisServlet init-params
> ---
Possible Null Poniter Exception in OutInAxisOperation.java:293
--
Key: AXIS2-4103
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4103
Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajika Kumarasiri updated AXIS2-4103:
-
Attachment: AXIS2-4103.patch
This patch contains a fix to the problem. Please review and
Typo in axis2.xml
-
Key: AXIS2-4104
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4104
Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4.1
Reporter: Luis Parravicini
Priority: Triv
Deepal,
yep, not taking care of them is what i meant. Yep, i totally
understand day-to-day work.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> One reason is that they have found that a small focused PMC/committer
>> set takes better care of the
No one is asking that everyone needs to get excited at the proposal.
If people are interested, let it move forward. If no one is
interested, it will just drop dead. If people take this forward, they
will decide what to do next when the TLP is formed, no one will be
forced to sign up for work or ne
Hi dims, all:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the board level
that a small focused PMC that directly reports to the board is better
than a huge umbrella PMCs. two umbrella PMC's have already made
transitions including XML and Jakarta.
+1. As PMC ch
Typos in site documentation
---
Key: AXIS2-4105
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4105
Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: documentation
Reporter: Luis Parravicin
Hi Sanjiva:
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Also the other reason IMO is that axis2 is mostly "done" .. I have no
objection at all to someone starting an axis3 or doing a lot of changes
to axis2, but I personally don't have major problems that I see need to
be fixed in axis2. Yes there are tons of
Hi,
does anyone mind if I apply the proposed patch for AXIS-2574? If not,
what would be the proper place to do that? AXIS_1_4_FINAL branch and
trunk?
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how
>
>> Also the other reason IMO is that axis2 is mostly "done" .. I have no
>> objection at all to someone starting an axis3 or doing a lot of
>> changes to axis2, but I personally don't have major problems that I
>> see need to be fixed in axis2. Yes there are tons of JIRAs and lots
>> of small is
I'm unable to build Axis2, after a fresh checkout from svn, using "mvn
clean install". It consistently fails during the SAAJ module build, with
an error on the SAAJResultTest:
---
Test set: org.apache.axis2.saaj.SAAJRes
This does not fail on Java 5. Anyway, committed a simple/temporary fix
to the test.
Jarek
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm unable to build Axis2, after a fresh checkout from svn, using "mvn clean
> install". It consistently fails during the SAAJ mo
Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi dims, all:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the board level
that a small focused PMC that directly reports to the board is better
than a huge umbrella PMCs. two umbrella PMC's have already made
transitions including XML and Jaka
Kurt T Stam wrote:
jUDDI has 3 active developers working on implementing the UDDIv3 spec
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/juddi/branches/v3_trunk/)
. Please don't talk about moth-balling us!
Just checking to see if you were paying attention. :)
No way, Kurt - I hope to be using your
How does becoming a TLP change the status quo for getting things done?
Sanjiva.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
No one is asking that everyone needs to get excited at the proposal.
If people are interested, let it move forward. If no one is
interested, it will just drop dead. If people take this forwa
Glen, so if you agree that its a TLP with Axis2 + up stream and downstream
projects then why not push the other stuff from ws into their own TLPs? If
we want to consider a new name for the ws project that's an option too but
that's a different issue isn't it?
Sanjiva.
Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi
So Glen, if we're talking about a new TLP what are the proposed components
under it? What will remain in the ws TLP because they don't have enough
ammo to be a TLP?
Sanjiva.
Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi dims, all:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the bo
Hi Jochen,
It appropriate to apply it to the trunk.
The final branch is final - it's what was shipped, so no more changes should be
made there. The trunk is in essence the 1.4 maintenance branch.
Tom Jordahl
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue
Hi,
Does anyone have comments on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4101? In general, I would
like to know if we should allow for multiple deployers to be
registered for the same file extension (for any directory). Right now,
only one is assumed and that causes problems.
Thanks,
Jarek
-
Thanks, that fixes the build on 1.6.
- Dennis
Jarek Gawor wrote:
This does not fail on Java 5. Anyway, committed a simple/temporary fix
to the test.
Jarek
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm unable to build Axis2, after a fresh checkout from s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepal Jayasinghe resolved AXIS2-4101.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This is not an issues , because what unique is combination of both th
Done.
Thank you!
Deepal
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have comments on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4101? In general, I would
> like to know if we should allow for multiple deployers to be
> registered for the same file extension (for any directory). Right now,
> only one is assumed and t
Let's flip the question, What do you have with Status Quo that you are
so opposed to change for the better?
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does becoming a TLP change the status quo for getting things done?
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> Davanum Sri
If we can find people to man the PMC's and act as chair, sure, let's
get more projects as TLP's.
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glen, so if you agree that its a TLP with Axis2 + up stream and downstream
> projects then why not push the ot
Anything that is usable/shipped with Axis2 or depends on Axis2 IMHO.
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Glen, if we're talking about a new TLP what are the proposed components
> under it? What will remain in the ws TLP because they don't h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reopened AXIS2-4101:
Deepal,
Please take a look at the code. The code assumes there is one deployer per
extension and thin
Deepal,
I think you misunderstood. The code assumes there is one deploeyer per
extension. See DeploymentEngine.getDeployerForExtension(). That should
either be:
Deployer getDeployerForExtension(String directory, String extension)
or
List getDeployerForExtension(String extension)
Jarek
On Tue,
Hi Jarek, Deepal:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Deepal,
I think you misunderstood. The code assumes there is one deploeyer per
extension. See DeploymentEngine.getDeployerForExtension(). That should
either be:
Deployer getDeployerForExtension(String directory, String extension)
or
List getDeployerForExt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Charitha Kankanamge resolved AXIS2-4102.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: nightly
Assignee: Charitha Kankanam
Clover Code coverage for Axis2
--
Key: AXIS2-4106
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4106
Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Ilanthiraya
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ilanthirayan Paramanathan updated AXIS2-4106:
-
Attachment: axis2_trunk_java.diff
After patch the File In Each pom.xml th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ilanthirayan Paramanathan updated AXIS2-4106:
-
Description:
I have attached a patch file to get colver test coverage ana
43 matches
Mail list logo