-Original Message-
From: Srinath Perera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 7:01 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release
did anybody use wsdl 2.0 for production? I know people will, but it is
not a concern for the users right now. We
Srinath and folks
So here is an idea for WSDL generation (http://blah/service?wsdl).
We can reflect on the component and easily find the operations. So we
could create a WSDL which gives details of the operations, but the
schemas are all simply complextypes that devolve to xsd:any.
Of course
cheap as the APIs are not compatible)? What benefits do I get?
--
Tom Jordahl
-Original Message-
From: Srinath Perera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 7:01 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release
did anybody use wsdl 2.0
Steve Loughran wrote:
Tom Jordahl wrote:
I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1
and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java). I
don’t think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front.
I would much rather release early/often with
did anybody use wsdl 2.0 for production? I know people will, but it is
not a concern for the users right now. We relase for the real world ..
to me holding axis2 out due to wsdl2 is unfair
let us implemet the thing when spec is final, and wsdl4j equivent
comes out. I see know reason we need to
Hi,
Since we are done with all the stuff that were planned to do for alpha,
I would like to cut the release on 24th. I know that our tiny little
data binding code is not there yet, but i think that will take sometime
and lets have it in the next release in a more stable manner.
So lets
Eran any possibiltiy to complete functionality (even though it is
tiny) for the alpha and do not add new functionality (big or small) in
following releases, beta or final.
I am getting feeling of what world think (anticipate) about Axis2, and
belive me it must be sound ...and if it is
Hi all,
Srinath Perera wrote:
Eran any possibiltiy to complete functionality (even though it is
tiny) for the alpha and do not add new functionality (big or small) in
following releases, beta or final.
Well, I don't think we will add more functionality. Remember we have
plugable
Hi all,
Yep I'm sure the 'first impression' is very important but frankly I
don't think this alpha release is going to be completed in
functionality even though I do not expect a major architectural change.
I can think of all sorts of minor imporvements / feature additions that
needs to be done
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 00:46 +0900, Eran Chinthaka wrote:
Hi all,
Srinath Perera wrote:
Eran any possibiltiy to complete functionality (even though it is
tiny) for the alpha and do not add new functionality (big or small) in
following releases, beta or final.
Well, I don't think
Performance AND usability. (default settings, client working w/o
explicit repository? etc)
thanks,
-- dims
On 9/23/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 00:46 +0900, Eran Chinthaka wrote:
Hi all,
Srinath Perera wrote:
Eran any possibiltiy to complete
Hi,
Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying 75% (actually it is a
rough number I picked without much thought and is not a reflection of
the actual amount of funtionality we need to add) but what I feel is
that there's room for functionality and improvements.
In my side I feel that pumps for
Macromedia Server Development
From: Ajith Ranabahu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005
1:43 PM
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha
release
Hi,
Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying 75
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 21:58 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
Hi all,
Yep I'm sure the 'first impression' is very important but frankly I
don't think this alpha release is going to be completed in
functionality even though I do not expect a major architectural
change. I
Tom Jordahl wrote:
I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1 and
WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java). I don’t
think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front.
I would much rather release early/often with a .92, .93, .95, etc.
:
axis-dev@ws.apache.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Axis2]
1.0-alpha
release
Hi,
Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying 75% (actually it is a rough
number I picked without much thought and is not a reflection of the
actual
amount of funtionality we need to add) but what I feel
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 14:46 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1
and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java). I
don’t think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front.
-1 on the WSDL 2.0 front .. there's no
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 14:46 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1
and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java). I
don’t think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0
Again, can we identify what specific function we want to have? For
those
of us working hard to get this completed, its helpful to get an actual
list of features/problems rather than open ended comments saying not
yet.
I thought I was being clear in my feature request. Its wasn't open
ended
Hi all,
All the guys in Sri Lanka, yesterday, worked hard till 2.00 a.m.
thinking to release alpha on 24th. If you all think that current
axis2 is not mature enough to be released as alpha, please please let
us know.
And we like to know the exact stuff we want to be finished for alpha.
My
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 17:06 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
Again, can we identify what specific function we want to have? For
those
of us working hard to get this completed, its helpful to get an actual
list of features/problems rather than open ended comments saying not
yet.
I thought I
Spec is not final either :(
On 9/23/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 17:06 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
Again, can we identify what specific function we want to have? For
those
of us working hard to get this completed, its helpful to get an actual
22 matches
Mail list logo
