axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-user@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], "axis-dev@ws.apache.org"
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Importance of SwA (Need Your Feedback)
Couldn't we add a flag to MTOM attachments OMText which simply says
don't include the XOP. In other words, you c
ot;Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/20/2006 06:54 AM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-user@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], "axis-dev@ws.apache.org"
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Importance
Hi Thilina,
On 7/19/06, Ben Malek, Hamid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I certainly will be happy to help you guys with this if you need to.
Thanks a lot. You are always welcome to join.
[Hamid]: Thilina, I know very well what the MTOM specification is saying,
and I agree with you that MTOM is
Couldn't we add a flag to MTOM attachments OMText which simply says
don't include the XOP. In other words, you create a standard MTOM
attachment but there is no reference in the XML.
Paul
On 7/20/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sanjiva,
We handle recieving SwA attachments. We d
Sanjiva,
We handle recieving SwA attachments. We don't have support for sending them.
-- dims
On 7/20/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 05:14 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
> Agreed. We need to do something to serialize the NON-MTOM attachments
> in the
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 05:14 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
> Agreed. We need to do something to serialize the NON-MTOM attachments
> in the MsgContxt attachments object.
I thought we did this .. Dims, didn't u put some stuff to store an
unreferenced attachment in the MC??
Sanjiva.
---
Thank you Dims, Paul, and Thilina for
you kind replies.
I certainly will be happy to help you
guys with this if you need to. My contact info is at the end of this email. If
you want me to help you with this, use my personal contact info as I may not be
able to read all the emails from
Hi,
Please see my reply to your earlier mail. Also some comments in line.
On 7/20/06, Ben Malek, Hamid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in Axis2. As you
know, ebMS is heavily built on SwA. The latest version of ebMS (ebMS-3) is
still relying o
Paul,
the key difference in terms of API is that you the attachment may or
may *not* be referenced in the soap message. So one should be able to
add an attachment w/o having to create an OMText in AXIOM.
-- dims
On 7/19/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hamid
Its been too long sin
Hamid
Its been too long since I looked at SwA. Doesn't it look sort of like
MTOM but without XOP?
Paul
On 7/19/06, Ben Malek, Hamid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in Axis2. As you
know, ebMS is heavily built on SwA. The latest version of
Hamid,
Looks like you have a good grasp on the details...Could you please
help us implement it? Let's start a JIRA and track progress.
thanks,
dims
On 7/19/06, Ben Malek, Hamid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in Axis2. As you
know, ebMS is
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in
Axis2. As you know, ebMS is heavily built on SwA. The latest version of ebMS
(ebMS-3) is still relying on SwA (support for MTOM will only be in the second
part of the spec, but the B2B space will still be using SwA for many years to
12 matches
Mail list logo
