On 08/03/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jukka,
There may be a way out...check the JIRA :)
Maybe it hasn't been clear (sorry) ... the code in the JIRA is a
snapshot of WSDL4J 1.4. Axis2 uses WSDL4J 1.6.2 which isn't
contributed. So, the revisions to WSDL4J since 1.4 haven't bee
Jukka,
There may be a way out...check the JIRA :)
-- dims
On 3/8/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 3/8/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK WSDL4J is pretty embedded into Axis2, because Axis2 uses it to
> dynamically create WSDL for POJO endpoints.
OK, than
Hi,
On 3/8/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK WSDL4J is pretty embedded into Axis2, because Axis2 uses it to
dynamically create WSDL for POJO endpoints.
OK, thanks.
It would be some significant effort to move to a non-CPL WSDL4J. I've
never heard of anyone complaining about
AFAIK WSDL4J is pretty embedded into Axis2, because Axis2 uses it to
dynamically create WSDL for POJO endpoints.
It would be some significant effort to move to a non-CPL WSDL4J. I've
never heard of anyone complaining about CPL before. Is it a real
objection to CPL or simply "its not ASL".
Paul
Hi,
On 3/8/07, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 07/03/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep I guess. If CPL is really an issue for some people maybe we should
> prompt IBM to donate as promised and Woden to build a version of
> WSDL4J too.
Although this is draft [1], it
On 07/03/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep I guess. If CPL is really an issue for some people maybe we should
prompt IBM to donate as promised and Woden to build a version of
WSDL4J too.
Although this is draft [1], it indicates CPL is ok to ship in binary
form (with conditions)
Hi Paul, I seem to remember IBM donating a snap shot, so I don't think
that means any of the revisions between then and the current HEAD of
CVS on sf.net. I'll check up on this though.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 07/03/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought that IBM donated the WSDL4J co
Yep I guess. If CPL is really an issue for some people maybe we should
prompt IBM to donate as promised and Woden to build a version of
WSDL4J too.
Paul
On 3/7/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul,
You are right. They did say they would donate it. I don't see the
paper work rea
Paul,
You are right. They did say they would donate it. I don't see the
paper work reaching apache. Either way, we get the jars from sf and
and don't build it ourselves. So it's under CPL.
thanks,
dims
On 3/7/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought that IBM donated the WSDL4J
I thought that IBM donated the WSDL4J code to Apache and relicensed it
when Woden was incubated. But maybe my memory is going as senility
sets in :-)
Paul
On 3/7/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 3/7/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Axis2 is in error.
Thanks
Hi,
On 3/7/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought that IBM donated the WSDL4J code to Apache and relicensed it
when Woden was incubated. But maybe my memory is going as senility
sets in :-)
Hmm, interesting. At least the Woden proposal said "IBM will donate
the WSDL4J source c
Hi,
On 3/7/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Axis2 is in error.
Thanks for the fast response! See AXIS2-2297 for the related bug report.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
Axis2 is in error.
-- dims
On 3/7/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Axis2 claims that the wsdl4j license is ASLv2, but the wsdl4j project
at SourceForge says it's CPL 1.0. Is the library dual-licensed or is
Axis2 in error?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
Hi,
Axis2 claims that the wsdl4j license is ASLv2, but the wsdl4j project
at SourceForge says it's CPL 1.0. Is the library dual-licensed or is
Axis2 in error?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
14 matches
Mail list logo
