Hello,
in the same idea, about starting a full backup at well-defined day of
the week (sunday for example), is it possible to use the
$Conf{DumpPreUserCmd} ?
I had looked in the code and the problem that there isn't return code
after executing the script defined by DumpPreUserCmd in the
Ba
Mark Cockrell wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 08:10, Mark Cockrell wrote:
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /home/backuppc/.ssh/identity
debug1: Offering public key: /home/backuppc/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Authentications that can continue
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:09, Mark Cockrell wrote:
Do these lines from /var/log/messages help?
Aug 24 15:01:23 warrior sshd(pam_unix)[5711]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.0.0.7 user=root
Aug 24 1
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:09, Mark Cockrell wrote:
> >
> Do these lines from /var/log/messages help?
>
> Aug 24 15:01:23 warrior sshd(pam_unix)[5711]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.0.0.7 user=root
> Aug 24 15:01:23 warrior sshd[5711]: pam_ldap: error tr
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 14:27, Mark Cockrell wrote:
I have done that repeatedly. I even went so far as to physically
copy the id_rsa file from the BackupPC server to the client rename it
authorized_keys2. I don't know why it's not able to match them up.
Hi,
I've been using an Ubuntu server with a 1.75TB USB RAID array to back up
~1TB of data for a few months now, but I seem to have a problem. One of
my biggest and most complex systems to back up is a big Apple G5. The
link process has been running since 8/22 13:56 and shows no sign of ever
fini
Le mercredi 24 Août 2005 21:27, Mark Cockrell a écrit :
>> [..}
> >is, the private /home/backuppc/.ssh/id_rsa didn't go with the
> >copy of id_rsa.pub that you should have appended to the
> >remote /root/.ssh/authorized_keys2. If you think you did this
> >right, I'd start over from scratch and gen
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 14:27, Mark Cockrell wrote:
> I have done that repeatedly. I even went so far as to physically
> copy the id_rsa file from the BackupPC server to the client rename it
> authorized_keys2. I don't know why it's not able to match them up.
You want to keep the id_rsa file
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 08:10, Mark Cockrell wrote:
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /home/backuppc/.ssh/identity
debug1: Offering public key: /home/backuppc/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 13:56, Scott Gamble wrote:
> > Hunh - so the word is be patient and see if it wakes up and does what
its
> > suppose to?
>
> Only if you have one of the constraints: too many already running
> or backuppc_nightly running.
Yeah neither of those things appear to be at iss
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 13:56, Scott Gamble wrote:
> Hunh - so the word is be patient and see if it wakes up and does what its
> suppose to?
Only if you have one of the constraints: too many already running
or backuppc_nightly running.
> I don't see any kind of immediate feedback beyond that oka
Hunh - so the word is be patient and see if it wakes up and does what its
suppose to? I don't see any kind of immediate feedback beyond that okay
message. New territory, asking questions you understand. I mean when I hit
the GO button I want it to go - thats why the cron script. What command is
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 13:21, Scott Gamble wrote:
> On a related note, this is what I see when i execute the following
>
> ark ~ # sudo -u backuppc /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_serverMesg backup
> 10.0.0.21 mail backuppc 1
> Got reply: ok: requested backup of mail
>
> But nothing happens. I a
Thanks Craig
Well that answers my question but begs another - by using
BackupPC_serverMesg is there no way to specify that it use the specific .pl
file? If not would it be possible to simply run something like this
instead?
sudo -u backuppc /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_dump -i host1 && sudo
is there any way for a backuppc 'normal user' to access the web
interface and have only access to their host config site ?? or do I have
to manually configure it on the apache server ?
many thanx
P.D: I´ll appreciate any suggestions/comments on how to do it
--
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 08:43, Olivier LAHAYE wrote:
> Your solution is working well and it is similar to my current configuration
> (all laptop are syncing their D drive to the home dir of the user that owns
> the laptop on a Filer:user work saved).
> The problem is that due to multiple instances o
Scott Gamble writes:
> I know this has been touched on repeatedly - and from kinda glossing through
> the archives I gather that its not a new idea at all, but is there any
> reason why scheduling of backups couldn't be handled exclusively by cron
> instead of the backuppc mechanism? The time fun
Your solution is working well and it is similar to my current configuration
(all laptop are syncing their D drive to the home dir of the user that owns
the laptop on a Filer:user work saved).
The problem is that due to multiple instances of the same file on the server,
we run out of space (80 la
Yes, the nightly scripts must run exclusively on the pools (no backup/restore
should be running)
However, if you execute BackupPC_serverMesg instead of BackupPC_dump, you
should be ok.
- Wade
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
Gamble
> [...]
> > - What will be the benefits of this clients compared to rsync/smb or tar
> > transfer methods?
>
> It will be similar to rsync but significantly faster (since it will
> be native C code at both ends, and doens't use cygwin on WinXX) and
> it will provide a path for ACLs and other met
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 05:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Second, you didn't say that backing up the clients would annoy the users.
> > Now it's an issue?
> YES and this is a big YES: Why? because user never want backup (privately or
> at work). and there are many reasons for that. Privately, the
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 07:51, Mark Cockrell wrote:
> > Did you try passwordless login with the -v option? This should indicate any
> > errors. Errors are also logged to a log file, but I don't recall which one.
> >
>
>
> Ah, good call. When I do that I get the following error message. Any
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:42:45 -0400
From: Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] A little help with SSH
Mark Cockrell wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 11:35, Mark Cockrell wrote:
>>
Hello,
I'm trying to install BackupPC-2.1.1 on Fedora Core 3 with xfer method:rsyncd.
When trying to do INSTALL-DIR-/bin/BackupPC_dump -v -f $host i receive:
Backup aborted(Unable to read 4 bytes) as error message.
Please someone can help me?
regards
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde
Tony Del Porto writes:
> On Aug 4, 2005, at 7:32 PM, Craig Barratt wrote:
>
> > Tony Del Porto writes:
> >
> >> I'm testing BackupPC with a couple of machines and full backups don't
> >> complete. The test machines are a Redhad 7.2 machine and an OS 10.3.9
> >> machine. Both are using tar (or xta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've seen seen on the BackupPC-devel mailing list archive that a new xfer
> method is seems currently in development called BackupPCd.
>
> I have few questions about that:
>
> - What will be the benefits of this clients compared to rsync/smb or tar
> transfer meth
"Kris S. Amundson" writes:
> I would like to purge a single file from ever existing on our back
> system. How can I do this?
If it is a particular path common to all backups, you can
manually "mangle" the name (add "f" to the start of each
directory and file) and just rm the files.
The copy of
Les,
As I read your answer, I see that the solution I proposed is far from being
easily doable (eventhough it look sexy) with the current release of BackupPC.
But maybe BackupPC could be enhanced to be able to have a slave.
I mean: during the nightly job, new files are identified.
For such fil
> First off - calm down. This is a voluntary list.
Sorry, maybe you missunderstood me, I'm not upset in anyway and I'm very calm.
I'm just trying to propose solutions that could help BackuPC beeing seen as a
realy wonderfull solution. As for your comment, please discuss privately
before shouting
Olivier,
First off - calm down. This is a voluntary list.
Second, you didn't say that backing up the clients would annoy the users. Now
it's an issue ? Perhaps the users of those machines who have previously lost
data due to a poor (or no) backup regime would be more than happy to be backed
up to
uh, in the event the formatting of my post gets mangled in your mail client,
you can view it here. The crontab section is much easier to read when
formatted properly.
http://blackcannon.org/wiki/index.php/LETTER
Thanks again everyone. Please respond to the list and not my email address.
Thanks
I know this has been touched on repeatedly - and from kinda glossing through
the archives I gather that its not a new idea at all, but is there any
reason why scheduling of backups couldn't be handled exclusively by cron
instead of the backuppc mechanism? The time functionality on backuppc seems
t
32 matches
Mail list logo
