Cory,
You're going to want your host to be called either "router" or
"router.university.edu". If you're on the local network, probably
either will work. "laptop" and "laptop.university.edu" will not work,
because they're not known on the public side of the router.
The error messages you're gett
Holger Parplies wrote:
> - The higher the level of the incremental backup, the greater the speedup,
> but the less certain you are of not having missed some changes.
In the case of rsync, is a greater speedup achieved due to 1) less
calculations to make about what to transfer, or 2) less actual t
I see this same behavior. For instance, I have a host that shows 309111
total files on backup #1, and 86 total files on backup #2. I can tell
by browsing the backups that there are more than 86 files contained in
backup #2, so I had assumed that this means 86 files were transferred.
But there's
Rob Owens wrote:
> Holger Parplies wrote:
>> - The higher the level of the incremental backup, the greater the speedup,
>> but the less certain you are of not having missed some changes.
> In the case of rsync, is a greater speedup achieved due to 1) less
> calculations to make about what to tran
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
>> Holger Parplies wrote:
>>> - The higher the level of the incremental backup, the greater the
>>> speedup,
>>> but the less certain you are of not having missed some changes.
>> In the case of rsync, is a greater speedup achieved due to 1) less
>> calcul
I know, it's discussed several times, but I can't find a solution for my
verification problem.
It's an installation on Ubuntu-6.06.1 LTS with apt-get, not compiled!
I created a keyfile on my BackupPc-Server (ssh-keygen -t rsa).
I copied the file "id_rsa.pub" to my client into /root/.ssh/.
Then
On 08/26 04:38 , Holger Parplies wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote on 21.08.2007 at 09:04:40 [[BackupPC-users]
> wishlist: full backups whenever incrementals get too large]:
> > [...]
> > Would it be reasonable to have backuppc check the time used by the last
> > incremental against the time
I got an error like this once (using sudo, though) and it turned out to
be that I had forgotten to install rsync on the host.
-Rob
Joachim Sturm wrote:
> I know, it's discussed several times, but I can't find a solution for my
> verification problem.
>
> It's an installation on Ubuntu-6.06.1 LTS
Rob,
Thanks for clarifying - I figured that laptop and laptop.university.edu would
not be discoverable but at this point I'm ready to try anything.
Now, in response to your question / suggestions:
The router is a D-Link DI-604, and I followed the instructions on
www.portforward.com to forward
Rob,
I need to make a slight correction to my previous e-mail (please read that one
as well, though :) )
rsync router:: returns
rsync: failed to connect to router: Connection refused (111)
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(104)
[receiver=2.6.9]
Thanks,
Cory
Cory Ri
I apologize in advance for posting this here if it doesn't belong but I'm
having trouble finding info on this subject.
I found a patched version of rsync that is supposed to support vss. I'm
looking for info on this if anybody has it. Particularly usage and
functionality. I can download the
Hello,
On windows clients, often the outlook.pst file cannot be backed up.
Now, I could exclude this file and be happy. But sometimes, Outlook is not
running during a backup, and in fact the file *could* be backed up. Thus, it
would be a pity if it wouldn't.
On the down side, the users would get
12 matches
Mail list logo
