The problem has been solved thanks to Craig:
- by examining the XferLOG, an error was found in the $Conf{TarClientCmd}:
> Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -n -l root server3 env LC_ALL=C /bin/tar
> -c -v -f - -C / --exclude=./\*tmp --exclude=./proc
> --exclude=./opt/install --exclude=./data/install
>
Jinshi wrote:
> Thank you all for your reply. Apparently everyone consider this is too
> slow since the difference between usb2.0 and usb1.1 is quite big. But I
> do tested all other usb ports. The dmesg says the transfer speed is
> either 40.000MB or 1.000MB/s. So, sorry everyone, I still insis
i doubt that dd will do much better than tar, maybe a few percent because it
can skip the filesystem layer BUT you will have to take an entire image of
the drive as dd doesnt do file level backups.
are you pushing tar through gzip? maybe try a lower level compression if
you CPU is overworked. yo
Thank you all for your reply. Apparently everyone consider this is too
slow since the difference between usb2.0 and usb1.1 is quite big. But I
do tested all other usb ports. The dmesg says the transfer speed is
either 40.000MB or 1.000MB/s. So, sorry everyone, I still insist I have
usb2.0 here
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:37:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
> 3.1.0 now shows up as an upgrade in Debian Lenny. I still have 3.0.0
> installed.
>
> I perused the changelog and didn't see anything major.
>
> Is there anything I should do before upgrading? Any reports of anything
> major breakin
Mark Best wrote:
> I’ve been reading through the forums and I’ve read two conflicting
> pieces of information. Could someone please clear this up.
>
> Does rsync transmit only the block of data that has changed - or is the
> whole file transmitted if the file has changed?
>
> (Example: A windo
I've been reading through the forums and I've read two conflicting
pieces of information. Could someone please clear this up.
Does rsync transmit only the block of data that has changed - or is the
whole file transmitted if the file has changed?
(Example: A windows user has changed a graph
I still have some trouple
>>Well, what is the error according to the error_log?
strange thing is that the 500 error does not show up in the logs using
lynx on localhost does now give access to the web-interface..
-
Th
heres a thought, for an external backup of the disk, dont use rsync. just
copy it over to the external drive. you could jsut tar.gz it over and
preserve the hard links also.
On Jan 3, 2008 7:29 AM, Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is topic is discussed pretty regularly on this m
I used BackupPC 3.1.0-1 on a fresh Debian Etch install, and it
wouldn't start because there was no MTA installed. I did an "apt-get
install exim4" and then BackupPC started up no problem, and I haven't
any other bugs to report for 3.1.0-1
I have already written to the package maintainer and
dan wrote:
> correction:
> linux can ping by netbios name. windows firewall and vista firewall
> block pings by default so you need to open it up a bit. either than
> or static IP addresses OR persistant IP assigned by DHCP and MAC
> address. then you can hard code the ip into client alias o
Andrew Gee wrote:
> In my backuppc log file it seems that it cannot find the address of the
> computer then...
>
> 2008-01-03 15:09:48 no ping response
>
> I'm not quite sure what I'm doing wrong here...
>
> Look forward to your reply
>
Andrew,
I have no experience with Vista, but my guess is
Andrew Gee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with my backuppc server trying to backup a windows
> vista machine. The computer's name is set as paul-pc. When I try to ping
> paul-pc it says the host cannot be found:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping paul-pc
> ping: unknown host paul-pc
>
Under Li
Hi,
I've got a problem with my backuppc server trying to backup a windows
vista machine. The computer's name is set as paul-pc. When I try to ping
paul-pc it says the host cannot be found:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping paul-pc
ping: unknown host paul-pc
But if I run nmblookup paul-pc it works fine:
> This is topic is discussed pretty regularly on this mailinglist.
> Please also search the archives.
Thanks, Nils. If the sourceforge.net mailing list search engine were
not so broken, I would gladly have combed through the archives. As it
stands I was unable to successfully search even for com
Jon S. wrote:
> 3.1.0 now shows up as an upgrade in Debian Lenny. I still have 3.0.0
> installed.
>
> I perused the changelog and didn't see anything major.
>
> Is there anything I should do before upgrading? Any reports of
> anything
> major breaking?
Still it's quite a list of bugfixes:
ht
16 matches
Mail list logo
