>
> I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
> pool with > 10 TB.
>
>
> > * I have recently taken my DRBD mirror off-line and copied the BackupPC
> > directory structure to both XFS-without-DRBD and an EXT4 file system for
> > testing. Performance of the XFS fil
Ralf Gross wrote:
>
> I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
> pool with > 10 TB.
Backuppc's usual scaling issues are with the number of files/links more than
total size, so the problems may be different when you work with huge files. I
thought someone had posted
Original Message
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC not cleaning out cpool.
From:"Joseph Holland"
Date:Tue, February 16, 2010 8:57 am
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
--
Gerald Brandt schrieb:
>
> >
> > I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
> > pool with > 10 TB.
> >
> >
> > > * I have recently taken my DRBD mirror off-line and copied the BackupPC
> > > directory structure to both XFS-without-DRBD and an EXT4 file system for
you would need to move up to 15K rpm drives to have a very large array and
the cost will grow exponentially trying to get such a large array.
as Les said, look at a zfs array with block level dedup. I have a 3TB setup
right now and I have some been running a backup against a unix server and 2
lin
Les Mikesell schrieb:
> Ralf Gross wrote:
> >
> > I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
> > pool with > 10 TB.
>
> Backuppc's usual scaling issues are with the number of files/links more than
> total size, so the problems may be different when you work with huge fi
On 2/19/2010 9:42 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Les Mikesell schrieb:
>> Ralf Gross wrote:
>>>
>>> I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
>>> pool with> 10 TB.
>>
>> Backuppc's usual scaling issues are with the number of files/links more than
>> total size, so the problems
Ralf Gross wrote on 02/19/2010 10:42:35 AM:
> bit off topic:
> Right now I'm looking for a cheap storage solution that is based
> on supermicro chassis with 36 drive bays (server) or 45 drive bays
> (expansion unit) in 4 HU. Frightening, that would be 810 TB in one
> Rack (36 + 45 HDDs x 5 x 2 TB
Les Mikesell schrieb:
> On 2/19/2010 9:42 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > Les Mikesell schrieb:
> >> Ralf Gross wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a
> >>> pool with> 10 TB.
> >>
> >> Backuppc's usual scaling issues are with the number of files/links mo
Timothy J Massey schrieb:
> Ralf Gross wrote on 02/19/2010 10:42:35 AM:
>
> > bit off topic:
> > Right now I'm looking for a cheap storage solution that is based
> > on supermicro chassis with 36 drive bays (server) or 45 drive bays
> > (expansion unit) in 4 HU. Frightening, that would be 810 TB
All,
Thanks for all the input. I'm starting to fully understand how
BackupPC scheduling is working now. My apologies for not stating that
I was/am using rsync as it is the only choice that makes sense =)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Craig Barratt
wrote:
> Mike,
>
>> Backup# Type
dan schrieb:
> you would need to move up to 15K rpm drives to have a very large array and
> the cost will grow exponentially trying to get such a large array.
>
> as Les said, look at a zfs array with block level dedup. I have a 3TB setup
> right now and I have some been running a backup against
On 2/19/2010 10:28 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
>
>>
>> if you dont want to go pure opensolaris then look at nexenta. it is a
>> functional opensolaris-debian/ubuntu hybrid with ZFS and it has dedup. it
>> does not currently share via iscsi so keep that in mind. I believe it also
>> uses a full samba p
Mike Bydalek wrote on 02/19/2010
11:28:25 AM:
> Thanks for all the input. I'm starting to fully understand how
> BackupPC scheduling is working now. My apologies for not stating that
> I was/am using rsync as it is the only choice that makes sense =)
In which case, after your first (potential
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Timothy J Massey wrote:
> Mike Bydalek wrote on 02/19/2010
> 11:28:25 AM:
>
>> Thanks for all the input. I'm starting to fully understand how
>> BackupPC scheduling is working now. My apologies for not stating that
>> I was/am using rsync as it is the only choic
I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our home
network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to backup the file on the
host machine that is the virtual disc for a number of virtual box VM, will it
have to backup the whole file each run (they are rather large) or i
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, John Moorhouse
wrote:
> I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our home
> network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to backup the file on the
> host machine that is the virtual disc for a number of virtual box VM, will it
> ha
John Moorhouse wrote on 02/19/2010 12:11:45
PM:
> I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our
> home network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to backup
> the file on the host machine that is the virtual disc for a number
> of virtual box VM, will it have to
Mike Bydalek wrote on 02/19/2010
12:39:29 PM:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, John Moorhouse
> wrote:
> > I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within
> our home network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to
> backup the file on the host machine that is the vir
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Mike Bydalek
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, John Moorhouse
> wrote:
>> I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our home
>> network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to backup the file on
>> the host machine that is
Ralf Gross wrote:
> Gerald Brandt schrieb:
>
>> You may want to look at this thread
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17234.html
>>
>>
>
> I've seen this thread, but the pool sizes there are max. in the lower
> TB region.
>
> Ralf
>
Not all of th
Chris Robertson wrote:
> Ralf Gross wrote:
>
>> Gerald Brandt schrieb:
>>
>>
>>> You may want to look at this thread
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17234.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I've seen this thread, but the pool sizes there are max.
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Mike Bydalek
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, John Moorhouse
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our home
>>> network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to backup
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:44:02PM -0500, Timothy J Massey wrote:
> John Moorhouse wrote on 02/19/2010 12:11:45
> PM:
>
> > I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our
> > home network, I'm wondering what will happen if I use it to backup
> > the file on the host machin
Richard Shaw wrote on 02/19/2010 02:04:49 PM:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Mike Bydalek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, John Moorhouse
> > wrote:
> >> I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within
> our home network, I'm wondering what will happen if I u
John Rouillard wrote on 02/19/2010 02:54:28
PM:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:44:02PM -0500, Timothy J Massey wrote:
> > John Moorhouse wrote on 02/19/2010
12:11:45
> > PM:
> >
> > > I'm happily using backupPC to backup a number of machine within our
> > > home network, I'm wondering what wi
Chris Robertson schrieb:
> Chris Robertson wrote:
> > Ralf Gross wrote:
> >
> >> Gerald Brandt schrieb:
> >>
> >>
> >>> You may want to look at this thread
> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17234.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I've see
27 matches
Mail list logo
