Tod Detre tod.de...@maine.edu wrote on 03/16/2011 04:41:05 PM:
I'd have to look at the rest of the code, but if gethostbyname
fails, and if you remove the nmb stuff, you're left with a hostname.
The question is, does the rest of the code work with a host name
string rather than an IP
Les,
I'm not about to read source, as have no time for that. If this is not
intuitive or the docs can not explain it, then I need another tool as I'm
rushed to get this done yesterday.
Thanks!
OMR
I can't be bothered to learn or do things, either! Why doesn't somebody
just make free
On 3/17/2011 11:03 AM, hans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:29 PM, OldManRiver
backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
I'm not about to read source, as have no time for that. If this is not
intuitive or the docs can not explain it, then I need another tool as I'm
rushed to
On 3/17/2011 10:05 AM, Michael Stowe wrote:
Les,
I'm not about to read source, as have no time for that. If this is not
intuitive or the docs can not explain it, then I need another tool as I'm
rushed to get this done yesterday.
I can't be bothered to learn or do things, either! Why
Hi,
I have a big host that is backed up using BackupPC. It has 456.21GB of
data actually. I want to off-site this data using the archive method to
removable USB disk. Until recently, that was not a big deal. The archive
process would take up to 45 hours to complete. Data has grown to the
On 3/17/2011 10:12 AM, Joe Konecny wrote:
I'm not claiming I can explain the solution to his problem but this is a good
example of why
microsoft is so successful. MS has MVP's (most valuable professional's) (and
they aren't
necessarily on ms's payroll) that hang out in forums and
On 3/17/2011 1:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/17/2011 10:12 AM, Joe Konecny wrote:
I'm not claiming I can explain the solution to his problem but this is a
good example of why
microsoft is so successful. MS has MVP's (most valuable professional's)
(and they aren't
necessarily on ms's
On 3/17/2011 1:05 PM, Joe Konecny wrote:
2. In my experience I have found that quite a few proprietary products
work better than the open source equivalent. Don't get me wrong... I
love open source and use quite a bit of it. Firefox, Thunderbird,
Openoffice, Hylafax, Linux, FreeBSD, Samba,
On 3/17/2011 2:49 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/17/2011 1:05 PM, Joe Konecny wrote:
2. In my experience I have found that quite a few proprietary products
work better than the open source equivalent. Don't get me wrong... I
love open source and use quite a bit of it. Firefox, Thunderbird,
Les Mikesell wrote:
There should be no need to read source, though.
Absolutely.
Anyone who says you should read the source
to find out how to use a program is talking nonsense.
The only time this could possibly make sense
is if the program is not running properly.
Just pick which xfer
type
On 3/17/2011 7:51 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Joe Konecny wrote:
I'm not claiming I can explain the solution to his problem but this is a
good example of why
microsoft is so successful. MS has MVP's (most valuable professional's)
(and they aren't necessarily on ms's payroll) that hang out in
11 matches
Mail list logo
