On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Philip Parsons (Velindre - Medical
Physics) wrote:
>
> It seems to me that for an rsyncd backup the incremental backups use the
> file attributes to check which files need to be backed up, but for the full
> backup this is turned off and block checksums are used t
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2015-12-24 13:09 GMT+01:00 Dr. Boris Neubert :
>> I have been using v4 for more than one year now on two CentOS servers
>> with rsync. It has ever since been working flawlessly for me.
>
> Sounds good.
> But, v3 has got much more fixe
I have come across a problem with shares on windows servers and
pc's. My backup server runs CentOS 7 with BackupPC version 3.3.1. I
have a few remote Linux and Windows servers that are backed up for
over a year now. The windows machines all use smb for backup. Linux
all r
Ah my mistake,
although I do not use the smb backup solution, I found that the incremental
smbclient command uses a -TcN $timeStampFile which should only backup the files
newer than the $timeStampFile. It looks like it is really an incremental backup
to me.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Ke
Micha,
Thanks, but I was specifically interested in the differences for SMB.
Thanks,
Phil.
From: Micha Kersloot [mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl]
Sent: 24 December 2015 12:08
To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] samba backup operation
Hi,
The differe
2015-12-24 13:09 GMT+01:00 Dr. Boris Neubert :
> I have been using v4 for more than one year now on two CentOS servers
> with rsync. It has ever since been working flawlessly for me.
Sounds good.
But, v3 has got much more fixes and releases that v4, are these fixed
already merged in v4 branch ?
W
Am 24.12.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
> 2015-12-24 5:24 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
>> I don't think a lot of people have tried it - partly because v3 works
>> so well. But, there have not been a lot of issues reported to the
>> list. I think I'd trust it if I were setting up up a
Hi,
The difference is the usage of the -ignore-times function of rsync which is
used in the full backup run.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Kersloot
__
www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks
E i...@kovoks.nl
T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 2
Hi all,
Thanks in advance for your help.
It seems to me that for an rsyncd backup the incremental backups use the file
attributes to check which files need to be backed up, but for the full backup
this is turned off and block checksums are used to check the file differences.
However, I can't
2015-12-24 5:24 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
> I don't think a lot of people have tried it - partly because v3 works
> so well. But, there have not been a lot of issues reported to the
> list. I think I'd trust it if I were setting up up a new system -
> Craig is an amazing programmer.
Ok, but lat
10 matches
Mail list logo
