> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom [mailto:chr...@real-time.com]
> Sent: den 15 maj 2016 17:16
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support us...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4
>
> On 05/14 05:53 , Ib H.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mauro Condarelli [mailto:mc5...@mclink.it]
> Sent: den 14 maj 2016 13:13
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4
>
> > Concerning what I can contribute: I am 19 years beyond the 60 year
> > milestone
It’s going to be hard to find all 5 in one person. I have 1, 2, and 4, which I
suspect is the combination most of us possess. 5 is in terribly short supply
for a lot of us too, so someone with 3 in particular, who can organize the
efforts of many people who could contribute small bits of work
I had intentions of trying to pick up the project and start fixing
bugs/etc, but swiftly reached the end of my C programming experience,
and then time.
I honestly think it might be near impossible to find anyone to lead the
project that has all the needed assets:
1) Perl programming
2) C progra
On 05/15 11:29 , Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> if anyone has (or finds) a reasonably recent address please share.
> I can be reached directly at mc5...@mclink.it and I am on Freenode/#backuppc,
I remember getting personal mail from him many years ago, but I can't find
the archives of thos messages. In
I’ve been using BackupPC for many years and would really hate to see it die.
It’s the best solution I’ve found in a very long time. If we can encourage
Craig to pick it up, or pick it up and run with it ourselves, or both (help
Craig with it), whatever keeps this excellent tool alive and evolvi
Il 15/05/2016 16:14, Les Mikesell ha scritto:
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Raoul Bhatia wrote:
>> Second, maybe we have some Googlers lurking on this list who might know
>> a better way to reach out to Craig?
> Yes, it looks like Google might be keeping him busy these days:
>
> http://www.
> On 15 May 2016, at 17:15, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
> wrote:
>
> On 05/14 05:53 , Ib H. Rasmussen wrote:
>> Although I'm not a contributor, and I don't think i'm cabable of being
>> one, I have been using BackupPC for more than 10 years, and i'm
>> absolutely for this initiative and i'm looki
On 05/14 05:53 , Ib H. Rasmussen wrote:
> Although I'm not a contributor, and I don't think i'm cabable of being
> one, I have been using BackupPC for more than 10 years, and i'm
> absolutely for this initiative and i'm looking forward to the success of it.
Same here.
--
Carl Soderstrom
System
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Raoul Bhatia wrote:
>
> Second, maybe we have some Googlers lurking on this list who might know
> a better way to reach out to Craig?
Yes, it looks like Google might be keeping him busy these days:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/googles-wireless-effort-is-led-by-a-g
On 15.05.2016 11:29, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> Il 14/05/2016 22:19, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
>> On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't
you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then an
Il 14/05/2016 22:19, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
> On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>>> It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't
>>> you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then and just
>>> leave the original project intact?
> I
Hello Juergen
May I suggest some edits to your letter, below.
On 05/14/2016 11:19 PM, Juergen Harms
wrote:
-- Original Message --
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4
D
13 matches
Mail list logo
