On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jim McNamara wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again for everyone's help, I'm a longtime lurker on these boards,
> > and I was quite pleased to have support when my usualy install
> > conditions were thrown out!
>
> I'm still curious about the real caus
Jim McNamara wrote:
>
> Thanks again for everyone's help, I'm a longtime lurker on these boards,
> and I was quite pleased to have support when my usualy install
> conditions were thrown out!
I'm still curious about the real cause of your problem, though. I
revived an old vmware image of Cent
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Adam Goryachev <
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm guessing your telephony system will be some commercial version of
> asterisk? I would seriously question the idea of putting both your
> telephony
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2008-12-16 19:39:54 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] CentOS
4.7 suid fails repeatedly with BackupPC]:
> Which brings up the question - why would anyone install a 4.x now if you
> don't already have something old that you need to keep working on it?
he does - an
Jim McNamara wrote:
>
> Solved! Thanks for everyone's help. I found that I did fine by manually
> downloading a httpd rpm, but knowing that -x doubles for --exclude is nice.
> That didn't make my yum man page.
>
> I now have graphics, password protection and all is well.
>
> I still will stick t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> To Adam Goryachev, I don't have any interest in CentOS (and
> judging by
>> other posts in this thread, competence with it either). The
> company I
>> work for got roped in using it for an individual project, as
> another
>> vendor brought in to do
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Mark Maciolek wrote:
>
>
> Jim McNamara wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
> > mailto:n...@lemonbit.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> > > Why is suexec involved?
> >
> > Les is right, you don't n
Jim McNamara wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
> mailto:n...@lemonbit.com>> wrote:
>
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > Why is suexec involved?
>
> Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
> causing your problem.
>
>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) <
n...@lemonbit.com> wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > Why is suexec involved?
>
> Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
> causing your problem.
>
> >> [2008-12-15 10:37:00]: file is either setuid or setgid:
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
causing your problem.
>> [2008-12-15 10:37:00]: file is either setuid or setgid:
>> (/var/www/cgi-bin/BackupPC_Admin)
>
> Yes, the config.pl script should have installed it mode 0455
Adam Goryachev wrote:
> Not sure I can help you with that one... I have never used CentOS
> and in
> fact avoid it. I've been quite happy with Debian ever since RedHat 8
> was
> released :) Hopefully someone else with more experience could assist
> you.
> Not that I think it can't work on ce
Jim McNamara wrote:
>
>
> Changing the permissions as you suggested helped, but now I'm plagued
> with a new set of errors that make little to no sense to me. When I go
> to http://my.lan.ip/cgi-bin/BackupPC_Admin I get a half-formed page, and
> this as the contents of the /var/log/httpd/error
Jim McNamara wrote:
>
> I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in the
> position of having done this probably 20 times on Debian without issue
> (past the first) and now with my first try on CentOS, I'm floundering
> badly.
There should not be any issues with Centos.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim McNamara wrote:
> Changing the permissions as you suggested helped, but now I'm plagued
> with a new set of errors that make little to no sense to me. When I go
> to http://my.lan.ip/cgi-bin/BackupPC_Admin I get a half-formed page, and
> this as t
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Adam Goryachev <
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim McNamara wrote:
> > I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in
> > the position of having done this probably 20 times on De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim McNamara wrote:
> I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in
> the position of having done this probably 20 times on Debian without
> issue (past the first) and now with my first try on CentOS, I'm
> floundering badly. I chan
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> >> [r...@telephony conf.d]# cat /etc/selinux/config
> >> # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
> >> # SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
> >> # enforcing - SELinux securit
Les Mikesell wrote:
>> [r...@telephony conf.d]# cat /etc/selinux/config
>> # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
>> # SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
>> # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced.
>> # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead
>
>
> Is that a cut/paste error or do you actually have targeted uncommented?
> By the way, it takes a reboot to make a change take effect.
>
> --
>Les Mikesell
>lesmikes...@gmail.com
>
>
That wasn't a cut/paste error, targeted came up uncommented from the get go.
I went through the instal
Jim McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Jim McNamara wrote:
>>> Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
>>> CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
>>> BackupPC running on that box, and I cann
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jim McNamara wrote:
> > Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
> > CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
> > BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to get BackupPC_A
Jim McNamara wrote:
> Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
> CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
> BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to get BackupPC_Admin (or
> the testsuid script found here -
> http://backuppc.so
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to get BackupPC_Admin (or
the testsuid script found here -
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/debugCGI.htm
23 matches
Mail list logo
