Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2008-12-16 19:39:54 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] CentOS
4.7 suid fails repeatedly with BackupPC]:
Which brings up the question - why would anyone install a 4.x now if you
don't already have something old that you need to keep working on it?
he does - an old project
Jim McNamara wrote:
Thanks again for everyone's help, I'm a longtime lurker on these boards,
and I was quite pleased to have support when my usualy install
conditions were thrown out!
I'm still curious about the real cause of your problem, though. I
revived an old vmware image of Centos
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Les Mikesell l...@futuresource.com wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
Thanks again for everyone's help, I'm a longtime lurker on these boards,
and I was quite pleased to have support when my usualy install
conditions were thrown out!
I'm still curious about
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Adam Goryachev
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm guessing your telephony system will be some commercial version of
asterisk? I would seriously question the idea of putting both your
telephony system
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Adam Goryachev
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim McNamara wrote:
I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in
the position of having done this probably 20 times on Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim McNamara wrote:
Changing the permissions as you suggested helped, but now I'm plagued
with a new set of errors that make little to no sense to me. When I go
to http://my.lan.ip/cgi-bin/BackupPC_Admin I get a half-formed page, and
this as the
Jim McNamara wrote:
I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in the
position of having done this probably 20 times on Debian without issue
(past the first) and now with my first try on CentOS, I'm floundering
badly.
There should not be any issues with Centos. Are
Adam Goryachev wrote:
Not sure I can help you with that one... I have never used CentOS
and in
fact avoid it. I've been quite happy with Debian ever since RedHat 8
was
released :) Hopefully someone else with more experience could assist
you.
Not that I think it can't work on centos,
Les Mikesell wrote:
Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
causing your problem.
[2008-12-15 10:37:00]: file is either setuid or setgid:
(/var/www/cgi-bin/BackupPC_Admin)
Yes, the config.pl script should have installed it mode 04554.
It
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
n...@lemonbit.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
causing your problem.
[2008-12-15 10:37:00]: file is either setuid or setgid:
Jim McNamara wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
n...@lemonbit.com mailto:n...@lemonbit.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
causing your problem.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Mark Maciolek m...@sr.unh.edu wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
n...@lemonbit.com mailto:n...@lemonbit.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To Adam Goryachev, I don't have any interest in CentOS (and
judging by
other posts in this thread, competence with it either). The
company I
work for got roped in using it for an individual project, as
another
vendor brought in to do the
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) n...@lemonbit.com
wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[r...@telephony conf.d]# cat /etc/selinux/config
# This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
# SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
# enforcing - SELinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim McNamara wrote:
I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in
the position of having done this probably 20 times on Debian without
issue (past the first) and now with my first try on CentOS, I'm
floundering badly. I changed
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to get BackupPC_Admin (or
the testsuid script found here -
Jim McNamara wrote:
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to get BackupPC_Admin (or
the testsuid script found here -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell l...@futuresource.com wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to
Jim McNamara wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell l...@futuresource.com wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box,
Is that a cut/paste error or do you actually have targeted uncommented?
By the way, it takes a reboot to make a change take effect.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
That wasn't a cut/paste error, targeted came up uncommented from the get go.
I went through the install with
Les Mikesell wrote:
[r...@telephony conf.d]# cat /etc/selinux/config
# This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
# SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
# enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced.
# permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of
21 matches
Mail list logo
