-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raphael Alla wrote:
> Based on this thread, is there any benefit in doing incremental backups
> when using rsync?
>
> It seems to me that full backup are vastly superior to incremental ones
> because:
> * They do use existing data available on the ser
Raphael Alla wrote:
> Based on this thread, is there any benefit in doing incremental
> backups when using rsync?
>
> It seems to me that full backup are vastly superior to incremental
> ones because:
> * They do use existing data available on the server and do not use
> more bandwidth than
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stephen Vaughan wrote on 2008-09-06 19:11:08 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
> Full vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?)]:
> > What about with multiple full backups, say your full backup is 50gig and
> you
> > do a full backup
Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> What about with multiple full backups, say your full backup is 50gig and you
> do a full backup once a week, will mean each full backup will use 50gigs of
> space? Or does the pool do some other linking between the data contained in
> each full backup?
All files with exact
Hi,
Stephen Vaughan wrote on 2008-09-06 19:11:08 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Full
vs. Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?)]:
> What about with multiple full backups, say your full backup is 50gig and you
> do a full backup once a week, will mean each full backup will use 50g
Hi,
dan wrote on 2008-09-05 21:26:25 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs.
Incremental (was: Backup through slow line?)]:
> the real difference between an rsync full and incremental in backuppc are
> the 3 following
>
> 1) a full has rsync ignore matching mtimes and checksum all fil
What about with multiple full backups, say your full backup is 50gig and you
do a full backup once a week, will mean each full backup will use 50gigs of
space? Or does the pool do some other linking between the data contained in
each full backup?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Christian Völker <[
the real difference between an rsync full and incremental in backuppc are
the 3 following
1) a full has rsync ignore matching mtimes and checksum all files while and
incremental trusts matching mtimes
2)backuppc has a different keep/delete schedule for fulls vs incrementals.
3)an incremental backu
Christian,
Here is a good post on Full vs. Incremental from a year ago. In
particular, check out the two threads that Holger links to.
http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06101.html
-Rob
Christian Völker wrote:
> Yohoo!
>
> |> I keep repeating this, so you migh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yohoo!
|> I keep repeating this, so you might all be bored, but still:
No, definetly not bored. For this it looks like it's too complicated :-\
|> When you factor pooling into the equasion, this means that the difference
|> between rsync full and inc
Thanks, that's what I was hoping to find out.
C-ya,
Mark
Duddley DoRight's Horses name was "Horse."
Paul Fox wrote:
> I need to call on my trusty BackupPC server to do a near bare-metal
> recovery of a server. I've got the OS loaded well enough to interface
> with BackupPC. What I n
> I need to call on my trusty BackupPC server to do a near bare-metal
> recovery of a server. I've got the OS loaded well enough to interface
> with BackupPC. What I need to know now is this: If I pick the most
> recent incremental install, will the data be filled to include all the
> f
I need to call on my trusty BackupPC server to do a near bare-metal
recovery of a server. I've got the OS loaded well enough to interface
with BackupPC. What I need to know now is this: If I pick the most
recent incremental install, will the data be filled to include all the
files from the p
13 matches
Mail list logo
