Hi.
I've upgraded from 2.1.1 to 3.0.0 like you, and some problems arise..
First it was the error about the language, and resolved it by renaming
/etc/backuppc and reinstalling the 3.0.0 version
then some errors appeared when backing up hosts, and the web interface
edit configuration does not
Craig Barratt wrote:
I do have a question: for your 2.x package you hardcoded the
config paths. In 3.x the FHS mode places the config files in
places similar to your 2.x package - but not exactly the same.
That's why people that started with your 2.x debian package
and then upgraded
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Jim McNamara wrote:
snip
If any additional info or configs would make this easier to diagnose,
please let me know.
Thanks,
Jim
Did you restart both backuppc and httpd after the upgrade. Not restarting
http will cause problems with the cgi-scripts.
Tony
Jim McNamara jim.mcnamara at gmail.com writes:
Hello list!
My thanks again go out to Craig for a great piece of software!
I have been running BackupPC 2.1.1 on a debian box, installed by the
apt-get package system. Tonight I upgraded by compiling 3.0.0, and
Good news: I've uploaded
Ludovic writes:
Good news: I've uploaded backuppc 3.0.0 to debian unstable yesterday.
Your feedback is welcome !
Thanks for doing this. Your previous 2.x debian package has
been very popular.
I do have a question: for your 2.x package you hardcoded the
config paths. In 3.x the FHS mode
Ludovic writes:
Craig Barratt wrote:
I do have a question: for your 2.x package you hardcoded the
config paths. In 3.x the FHS mode places the config files in
places similar to your 2.x package - but not exactly the same.
That's why people that started with your 2.x debian package
Hello list!
My thanks again go out to Craig for a great piece of software!
I have been running BackupPC 2.1.1 on a debian box, installed by the
apt-get package system. Tonight I upgraded by compiling 3.0.0, and
encountered a good number of problems, largely resulting from Debian
modifications.
